| Literature DB >> 15653824 |
Abstract
Identification of gram-negative bacilli, both enteric and nonenteric, by conventional methods is not realistic for clinical microbiology laboratories performing routine cultures in today's world. The use of commercial kits, either manual or automated, to identify these organisms is a common practice. The advent of rapid or "spot" testing has eliminated the need for some commonly isolated organisms to be identified with the systems approach. Commercially available systems provide more in-depth identification to the species level as well as detect new and unusual strains. The answers obtained from these systems may not always be correct and must be interpreted with caution. The patient demographics, laboratory workload and work flow, and technologist's skill levels should dictate the system of choice. Cost considerations introduce another variable into the equation affecting choice. Each system has its own strengths and weaknesses, and each laboratory must decide on the level of sophistication that fulfills its particular needs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15653824 PMCID: PMC544179 DOI: 10.1128/CMR.18.1.147-162.2005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev ISSN: 0893-8512 Impact factor: 26.132