Literature DB >> 10692310

Response kinetics of tethered Rhodobacter sphaeroides to changes in light intensity.

R M Berry1, J P Armitage.   

Abstract

Rhodobacter sphaeroides can swim toward a wide range of attractants (a process known as taxis), propelled by a single rotating flagellum. The reversals of motor direction that cause tumbles in Eschericia coli taxis are replaced by brief motor stops, and taxis is controlled by a complex sensory system with multiple homologues of the E. coli sensory proteins. We tethered photosynthetically grown cells of R. sphaeroides by their flagella and measured the response of the flagellar motor to changes in light intensity. The unstimulated bias (probability of not being stopped) was significantly larger than the bias of tethered E. coli but similar to the probability of not tumbling in swimming E. coli. Otherwise, the step and impulse responses were the same as those of tethered E. coli to chemical attractants. This indicates that the single motor and multiple sensory signaling pathways in R. sphaeroides generate the same swimming response as several motors and a single pathway in E. coli, and that the response of the single motor is directly observable in the swimming pattern. Photo-responses were larger in the presence of cyanide or the uncoupler carbonyl cyanide 4-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP), consistent with the photo-response being detected via changes in the rate of electron transport.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10692310      PMCID: PMC1300723          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76678-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  28 in total

1.  Physics of chemoreception.

Authors:  H C Berg; E M Purcell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  J E Segall; S M Block; H C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Role of metabolism in the chemotactic response of Rhodobacter sphaeroides to ammonia.

Authors:  P S Poole; J P Armitage
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Flagellar rotation and the mechanism of bacterial motility.

Authors:  M Silverman; M Simon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-05-03       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Unidirectional, intermittent rotation of the flagellum of Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  J P Armitage; R M Macnab
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Adaptation kinetics in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  S M Block; J E Segall; H C Berg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Impulse responses in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  S M Block; J E Segall; H C Berg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Motility response of Rhodobacter sphaeroides to chemotactic stimulation.

Authors:  P S Poole; J P Armitage
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Involvement of transport in Rhodobacter sphaeroides chemotaxis.

Authors:  C J Ingham; J P Armitage
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Temporal stimulation of chemotaxis in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  D A Brown; H C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  14 in total

1.  Behavioral responses of Rhodobacter sphaeroides to linear gradients of the nutrients succinate and acetate.

Authors:  H L Packer; J P Armitage
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  New motion analysis system for characterization of the chemosensory response kinetics of Rhodobacter sphaeroides under different growth conditions.

Authors:  Mila Kojadinovic; Antoine Sirinelli; George H Wadhams; Judith P Armitage
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Light-induced behavioral responses (;phototaxis') in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Judith P Armitage; Klaas J Hellingwerf
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Signal processing in complex chemotaxis pathways.

Authors:  Steven L Porter; George H Wadhams; Judith P Armitage
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Transformations in flagellar structure of Rhodobacter sphaeroides and possible relationship to changes in swimming speed.

Authors:  J P Armitage; T P Pitta; M A Vigeant; H L Packer; R M Ford
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Taxis response of various denitrifying bacteria to nitrate and nitrite.

Authors:  Dong Yun Lee; Adela Ramos; Lee Macomber; James P Shapleigh
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  The thermal impulse response of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Eli Paster; William S Ryu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A bifunctional kinase-phosphatase in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Steven L Porter; Mark A J Roberts; Cerys S Manning; Judith P Armitage
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Modeling chemotaxis reveals the role of reversed phosphotransfer and a bi-functional kinase-phosphatase.

Authors:  Marcus J Tindall; Steven L Porter; Philip K Maini; Judith P Armitage
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Bacterial chemotaxis: introverted or extroverted? A comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of basic forms of metabolism-based and metabolism-independent behavior using a computational model.

Authors:  Matthew D Egbert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.