Literature DB >> 3500167

Involvement of transport in Rhodobacter sphaeroides chemotaxis.

C J Ingham1, J P Armitage.   

Abstract

The chemotactic response to a range of chemicals was investigated in the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, an organism known to lack conventional methyl-accepting sensory transduction proteins. Strong attractants included monocarboxylic acids and monovalent cations. Results suggest that the chemotactic response required the uptake of the chemoeffector, but not its metabolism. If a chemoeffector could block the uptake of another attractant, it also inhibited chemotaxis to that attractant. Sodium benzoate was not an attractant but was a competitive inhibitor of the propionate uptake system. Binding in an active uptake system was therefore insufficient to cause a chemotactic response. At different concentrations, benzoate either blocked propionate chemotaxis or reduced the sensitivity of propionate chemotaxis, an effect consistent with its role as a competitive inhibitor of uptake. Bacteria only showed chemotaxis to ammonium when grown under ammonia-limited conditions, which derepressed the ammonium transport system. Both chemotaxis and uptake were sensitive to the proton ionophore carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone, suggesting an involvement of the proton motive force in chemotaxis, at least at the level of transport. There was no evidence for internal pH as a sensory signal. These results suggest a requirement for the uptake of attractants in chemotactic sensing in R. sphaeroides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3500167      PMCID: PMC214150          DOI: 10.1128/jb.169.12.5801-5807.1987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  30 in total

1.  Unidirectional, intermittent rotation of the flagellum of Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  J P Armitage; R M Macnab
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Sensory transduction in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  G L Hazelbauer; S Harayama
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1983

3.  Quantitative agreement between the values for the light-induced delta pH in Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides measured with automated follow-dialysis and 31P NMR.

Authors:  K Nicolay; J Lolkema; K J Hellingwerf; R Kaptein; W N Konings
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1981-01-26       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  A protonmotive force drives bacterial flagella.

Authors:  M D Manson; P Tedesco; H C Berg; F M Harold; C Van der Drift
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Aerotaxis in Salmonella typhimurium: role of electron transport.

Authors:  D J Laszlo; B L Taylor
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  A voltage clamp inhibits chemotaxis of Spirochaeta aurantia.

Authors:  E A Goulbourne; E P Greenberg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Energy coupling of facilitated transport of inorganic ions in Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides.

Authors:  K J Hellingwerf; I Friedberg; J S Lolkema; P A Michels; W N Konings
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Genetic and biochemical requirements for chemotaxis to L-proline in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  M Clancy; K A Madill; J M Wood
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Chemotactic signaling in filamentous cells of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J E Segall; A Ishihara; H C Berg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Chemotaxis of Spirochaeta aurantia: involvement of membrane potential in chemosensory signal transduction.

Authors:  E A Goulbourne; E P Greenberg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Functional Regulators of Bacterial Flagella.

Authors:  Sundharraman Subramanian; Daniel B Kearns
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 15.500

2.  Chemotaxis toward Nitrogenous Compounds by Swimming Strains of Marine Synechococcus spp.

Authors:  J M Willey; J B Waterbury
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Signal processing in complex chemotaxis pathways.

Authors:  Steven L Porter; George H Wadhams; Judith P Armitage
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Methylation-independent and methylation-dependent chemotaxis in Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Rhodospirillum rubrum.

Authors:  R E Sockett; J P Armitage; M C Evans
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Diverse populations of lake water bacteria exhibit chemotaxis towards inorganic nutrients.

Authors:  Paul G Dennis; Justin Seymour; Kimber Kumbun; Gene W Tyson
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Role of metabolism in the chemotactic response of Rhodobacter sphaeroides to ammonia.

Authors:  P S Poole; J P Armitage
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Motility response of Rhodobacter sphaeroides to chemotactic stimulation.

Authors:  P S Poole; J P Armitage
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Electron transport-dependent taxis in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  D E Gauden; J P Armitage
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Relationships between C4 dicarboxylic acid transport and chemotaxis in Rhizobium meliloti.

Authors:  J B Robinson; W D Bauer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Motility, chemokinesis, and methylation-independent chemotaxis in Azospirillum brasilense.

Authors:  I B Zhulin; J P Armitage
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.