Literature DB >> 10687700

Stochastic properties of cat auditory nerve responses to electric and acoustic stimuli and application to intensity discrimination.

E Javel1, N F Viemeister.   

Abstract

Statistical properties of electrically stimulated (ES) and acoustically stimulated (AS) auditory nerve fiber responses were assessed in undeafened and short-term deafened cats, and a detection theory approach was used to determine fibers' abilities to signal intensity changes. ES responses differed from AS responses in several ways. Rate-level functions were an order of magnitude steeper, and discharge rate normally saturated at the stimulus pulse rate. Dynamic ranges were typically 1-4 dB for 200 pps signals, as compared with 15-30 dB for AS signals at CF, and they increased with pulse rate without improving threshold or changing absolute rate-level function slopes. For both ES and AS responses, variability of spike counts elicited by repeated trials increased with level in accord with Poisson-process predictions until the discharge rate exceeded 20-40 spikes/s. AS variability continued increasing monotonically at higher discharge rates, but more slowly. In contrast, maximum ES variability was usually attained at 100 spikes/s, and at higher discharge rates variability reached a plateau that was either maintained or decreased slightly until discharge rate approached the stimulus pulse rate. Variability then decreased to zero as each pulse elicited a spike. Increasing pulse rate did not substantially affect variability for rates up to 800 pps; rather, higher pulse rates simply extended the plateau region. Spike count variability was unusually high for some ES fibers. This was traced to response nonstationarities that stemmed from two sources, namely level-dependent fluctuations in excitability that occurred at 1-3 s intervals and, for responses to high-rate, high-intensity signals, fatigue that arose when fibers discharged at their maximum possible rates. Intensity discrimination performance was assessed using spike count as the decision variable in a simulated 2IFC task. Neurometric functions (percent correct versus intensity difference) were obtained at several levels of the standard (I), and the intensity difference (delta I) necessary for 70% correct responses was estimated. AS Weber fractions (10 log delta I/I) averaged +0.2 dB (delta IdB = 3.1 dB) for 50 ms tones at CF. ES Weber fractions averaged -12.8 dB (delta IdB = 0.23 dB) for 50 ms, 200 pps signals, and performance was approximately constant between 100 and 1000 pps. Intensity discrimination by single cells in ES conditions paralleled human psychophysical performance for similar signals. High ES sensitivity to intensity changes arose primarily from steeper rate-level functions and secondarily from reduced spike count variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10687700     DOI: 10.1121/1.428269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

Review 1.  Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jason Boulet; Mark White; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

2.  Dynamical instability determines the effect of ongoing noise on neural firing.

Authors:  David E O'Gorman; John A White; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-03-24

3.  Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear-Implant Users: Relationship to Psychometric Functions for Detection

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  The dependence of auditory nerve rate adaptation on electric stimulus parameters, electrode position, and fiber diameter: a computer model study.

Authors:  Jihwan Woo; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

5.  Modeling binaural responses in the auditory brainstem to electric stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Yoojin Chung; Bertrand Delgutte; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-28

6.  Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: Relationship to spatial selectivity.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Optimal combination of neural temporal envelope and fine structure cues to explain speech identification in background noise.

Authors:  Il Joon Moon; Jong Ho Won; Min-Hyun Park; D Timothy Ives; Kaibao Nie; Michael G Heinz; Christian Lorenzi; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Ion channel noise can explain firing correlation in auditory nerves.

Authors:  Bahar Moezzi; Nicolangelo Iannella; Mark D McDonnell
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 1.621

9.  Relationship between gap detection thresholds and loudness in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  Challenges for stem cells to functionally repair the damaged auditory nerve.

Authors:  Karina Needham; Ricki L Minter; Robert K Shepherd; Bryony A Nayagam
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 4.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.