Literature DB >> 18820663

The number of lymph nodes identified in a simple pancreatoduodenectomy specimen: comparison of conventional vs orange-peeling approach in pathologic assessment.

N Volkan Adsay1, Olca Basturk, Deniz Altinel, Fayyaz Khanani, Ipek Coban, Donald W Weaver, David A Kooby, Juan M Sarmiento, Charles Staley.   

Abstract

Lymph node status is one of the most important predictors of survival in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; therefore, thorough lymph node evaluation is a critical assessment in pancreatoduodenectomy specimens. There is considerable variability in pancreatoduodenectomy specimens processed histologically. This study compares two approaches of lymph node dissection and evaluation (standard vs orange peeling) of pancreatoduodenectomy specimens. A different approach to dissection of pancreatoduodenectomy specimens was designed to optimize lymph node harvesting: All peripancreatic soft tissues were removed in an orange-peeling manner before further dissection of the pancreatic head. This approach was applied to 52 consecutive pancreatoduodenectomy specimens performed for ductal adenocarcinoma at two institutions. Specimen dissection was otherwise performed routinely. Overall number of lymph nodes harvested, number of positive lymph nodes, and their anatomic distribution were analyzed and compared with cases that had been dissected by the conventional approach. The mean number of lymph nodes identified by the orange-peeling approach was 14.1 (by institution, 13.8 and 14.4), as opposed to 6.1 (by institution, 7 and 5.3) in cases processed by conventional approach (P=0.0001). The number of lymph node-positive cases also increased substantially from 50% (by institution, 54 and 46%) in the conventional method to 73% (by institution, 88 and 58%) in the orange-peeling method (P=0.02). The orange-peeling method of lymph node harvest in pancreatoduodenectomy specimens for ductal adenocarcinoma enhances overall and positive lymph node yield and optimizes ductal adenocarcinoma staging. Therefore, lymph node harvest by the orange-peeling method should be performed routinely before specimen sectioning in assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18820663      PMCID: PMC3163852          DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  27 in total

Review 1.  Staging of exocrine pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  P Hermanek
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Feasibility of a randomized trial of extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Timothy M Pawlik; Eddie K Abdalla; Carlton C Barnett; Syed A Ahmad; Karen R Cleary; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Jeffrey E Lee; Douglas B Evans; Peter W T Pisters
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-06

Review 3.  Lymphatic staging in colorectal cancer: pathologic, molecular, and sentinel node techniques.

Authors:  A E Braat; J W A Oosterhuis; J E de Vries; R A E M Tollenaar
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  The need for standardized pathologic staging of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens.

Authors:  C A Staley; K R Cleary; J L Abbruzzese; J E Lee; F C Ames; C J Fenoglio; D B Evans
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Practical grouping of positive lymph nodes in pancreatic head cancer treated by an extended pancreatectomy.

Authors:  O Ishikawa; H Ohigashi; Y Sasaki; T Kabuto; H Furukawa; S Nakamori; S Imaoka; T Iwanaga; T Kasugai
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 6.  The staging of colorectal cancer: 2004 and beyond.

Authors:  Carolyn C Compton; Frederick L Greene
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Significance of lymph node metastases in the surgical management of pancreatic head carcinoma.

Authors:  G Benassai; M Mastrorilli; F Mosella; G Mosella
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1999-03

8.  Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt; M A Talamini; R H Hruban; S E Ord; P K Sauter; J Coleman; M L Zahurak; L B Grochow; R A Abrams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The pattern of lymph node involvement in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. A histologic study of the surgical findings in patients undergoing extensive nodal dissections.

Authors:  T Nagakawa; H Kobayashi; K Ueno; T Ohta; M Kayahara; K Mori; T Nakano; T Takeda; I Konishi; I Miyazaki
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1993-02

10.  The retroperitoneal resection margin and vessel involvement are important factors determining survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas.

Authors:  J Lüttges; I Vogel; M Menke; D Henne-Bruns; B Kremer; G Klöppel
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.064

View more
  20 in total

1.  Whipple made simple for surgical pathologists: orientation, dissection, and sampling of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens for a more practical and accurate evaluation of pancreatic, distal common bile duct, and ampullary tumors.

Authors:  N Volkan Adsay; Olca Basturk; Burcu Saka; Pelin Bagci; Denizhan Ozdemir; Serdar Balci; Juan M Sarmiento; David A Kooby; Charles Staley; Shishir K Maithel; Rhonda Everett; Jeanette D Cheng; Duangpeng Thirabanjasak; Donald W Weaver
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Sven-Petter Haugvik; Irina Pavlik Marangos; Bård Ingvald Røsok; Ewa Pomianowska; Ivar Prydz Gladhaug; Oystein Mathisen; Bjørn Edwin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Lymph node ratio as parameter of regional lymph node involvement in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Suguru Yamada; Tsutomu Fujii; Akihiro Hirakawa; Mitsuro Kanda; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus open approach for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; XiangHu Wu; Feng Zhu; Ming Shen; Rui Tian; ChengJian Shi; Xin Wang; GuangQin Xiao; XingJun Guo; Min Wang; RenYi Qin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Intrapancreatic distal common bile duct carcinoma: Analysis, staging considerations, and comparison with pancreatic ductal and ampullary adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Raul S Gonzalez; Pelin Bagci; Olca Basturk; Michelle D Reid; Serdar Balci; Jessica H Knight; So Yeon Kong; Bahar Memis; Kee-Taek Jang; Nobuyuki Ohike; Takuma Tajiri; Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Grace E Kim; Jeanette D Cheng; N Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Substaging Nodal Status in Ampullary Carcinomas has Significant Prognostic Value: Proposed Revised Staging Based on an Analysis of 313 Well-Characterized Cases.

Authors:  Serdar Balci; Olca Basturk; Burcu Saka; Pelin Bagci; Lauren M Postlewait; Takuma Tajiri; Kee-Taek Jang; Nobuyuki Ohike; Grace E Kim; Alyssa Krasinskas; Hyejeong Choi; Juan M Sarmiento; David A Kooby; Bassel F El-Rayes; Jessica H Knight; Michael Goodman; Gizem Akkas; Michelle D Reid; Shishir K Maithel; Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Ai-Bin Zhang; Ye Wang; Chen Hu; Yan Shen; Shu-Sen Zheng
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.066

8.  The influence of total nodes examined, number of positive nodes, and lymph node ratio on survival after surgical resection and adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer: a secondary analysis of RTOG 9704.

Authors:  Timothy N Showalter; Kathryn A Winter; Adam C Berger; William F Regine; Ross A Abrams; Howard Safran; John P Hoffman; Al B Benson; John S MacDonald; Christopher G Willett
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Determining the Adequate Examined Lymph Node Count in Resected Ampullary Adenocarcinoma-A National Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ibrahim Nassour; Alana Christie; Michael A Choti; John C Mansour; Rebecca M Minter; Patricio M Polanco; Mathew M Augustine; Matthew R Porembka; Xian-Jin Xie; Sam C Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma is Spread to the Peripancreatic Soft Tissue in the Majority of Resected Cases, Rendering the AJCC T-Stage Protocol (7th Edition) Inapplicable and Insignificant: A Size-Based Staging System (pT1: ≤2, pT2: >2-≤4, pT3: >4 cm) is More Valid and Clinically Relevant.

Authors:  Burcu Saka; Serdar Balci; Olca Basturk; Pelin Bagci; Lauren M Postlewait; Shishir Maithel; Jessica Knight; Bassel El-Rayes; David Kooby; Juan Sarmiento; Takashi Muraki; Irma Oliva; Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay; Gizem Akkas; Michael Goodman; Michelle D Reid; Alyssa Krasinskas; Rhonda Everett; Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.