Literature DB >> 24744586

Clinical significance of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.

Jing-Yu Deng1, Han Liang1.   

Abstract

Gastric cancer, one of the most common malignancies in the world, frequently reveals lymph node, peritoneum, and liver metastases. Most of gastric cancer patients present with lymph node metastasis when they were initially diagnosed or underwent surgical resection, which results in poor prognosis. Both the depth of tumor invasion and lymph node involvement are considered as the most important prognostic predictors of gastric cancer. Although extended lymphadenectomy was not considered a survival benefit procedure and was reported to be associated with high mortality and morbidity in two randomized controlled European trials, it showed significant superiority in terms of lower locoregional recurrence and disease related deaths compared to limited lymphadenectomy in a 15-year follow-up study. Almost all clinical investigators have reached a consensus that the predictive efficiency of the number of metastatic lymph nodes is far better than the extent of lymph node metastasis for the prognosis of gastric cancer worldwide, but other nodal metastatic classifications of gastric cancer have been proposed as alternatives to the number of metastatic lymph nodes for improving the predictive efficiency for patient prognosis. It is still controversial over whether the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes is superior to the number of metastatic lymph nodes in prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer. Besides, the negative lymph node count has been increasingly recognized to be an important factor significantly associated with prognosis of gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lymph node; Metastasis; Neoplasm; Prognosis; Stomach

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24744586      PMCID: PMC3983452          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.3967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  103 in total

1.  The new Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma: Points to be revised.

Authors:  Takashi Aiko; Mitsuru Sasako
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Prognostic impact of metastatic lymph node ratio on gastric cancer after curative distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Chang-Ming Huang; Jian-Xian Lin; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Bi-Juan Lin; Jia-Bin Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Nodal dissection for patients with gastric cancer: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Chew-Wun Wu; Chao A Hsiung; Su-Shun Lo; Mao-Chin Hsieh; Jen-Hao Chen; Anna Fen-Yau Li; Wing-Yiu Lui; Jacqueline Whang-Peng
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  J J Bonenkamp; J Hermans; M Sasako; C J van de Velde; K Welvaart; I Songun; S Meyer; J T Plukker; P Van Elk; H Obertop; D J Gouma; J J van Lanschot; C W Taat; P W de Graaf; M F von Meyenfeldt; H Tilanus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Analysis of 154 actual five-year survivors of gastric cancer.

Authors:  S N Hochwald; S Kim; D S Klimstra; M F Brennan; M S Karpeh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Status of extended lymph node dissection: locoregional control is the only way to survive gastric cancer.

Authors:  Henk H Hartgrink; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  H Katai; K Yoshimura; K Maruyama; M Sasako; T Sano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Prognostic significance of the number of positive lymph nodes in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Y Adachi; T Kamakura; M Mori; H Baba; Y Maehara; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Gastric cancer surgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy--Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 9501.

Authors:  Takeshi Sano; Mitsuru Sasako; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Atsushi Nashimoto; Akira Kurita; Masahiro Hiratsuka; Toshimasa Tsujinaka; Taira Kinoshita; Kuniyoshi Arai; Yoshitaka Yamamura; Kunio Okajima
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Analysis of risk factors for the interval time, number and pattern of hepatic metastases from gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy.

Authors:  Jing-Yu Deng; Han Liang; Dan Sun; Hong-Jie Zhan; Ru-Peng Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  75 in total

1.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yingjun Quan; Ao Huang; Min Ye; Ming Xu; Biao Zhuang; Peng Zhang; Bo Yu; Zhijun Min
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Xiaotan Sanjie decoction inhibits interleukin-8-induced metastatic potency in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jun Shi; Pin-Kang Wei
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Imaging strategies in the management of gastric cancer: current role and future potential of MRI.

Authors:  Alicia S Borggreve; Lucas Goense; Hylke J F Brenkman; Stella Mook; Gert J Meijer; Frank J Wessels; Marcel Verheij; Edwin P M Jansen; Richard van Hillegersberg; Peter S N van Rossum; Jelle P Ruurda
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  A new pN staging system based on both the number and anatomic location of metastatic lymph nodes in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jianhui Chen; Chuangqi Chen; Yulong He; KaiMing Wu; Hui Wu; Shirong Cai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Clinical significance of lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Dezső Tóth; János Plósz; Miklós Török
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-02-15

6.  Postoperative ratio of the maximum C-reactive protein level to the minimum peripheral lymphocyte count as a prognostic indicator for gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Yusuke Kono; Hiroaki Saito; Yuki Murakami; Yuji Shishido; Hirohiko Kuroda; Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Manabu Yamamoto; Yoji Fukumoto; Tomohiro Osaki; Keigo Ashida; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Low-dose interleukin-8 induces the adhesion, migration and invasion of the gastric cancer SGC-7901 cell line.

Authors:  Jun Shi; Pin-Kang Wei
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Overexpression of CST4 promotes gastric cancer aggressiveness by activating the ELFN2 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Yi Qiang Zhang; Jing Jing Zhang; Hong Jie Song; Da Wei Li
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 9.  Molecular background of the regional lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Tong Zhu; Xueqian Hu; Pinkang Wei; Guangzhi Shan
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Lymph node status after resection for gallbladder adenocarcinoma: prognostic implications of different nodal staging/scoring systems.

Authors:  Neda Amini; Gaya Spolverato; Yuhree Kim; Rohan Gupta; Georgios Antonios Margonis; Aslam Ejaz; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.