Boyle C Cheng1, Isaac Swink1, Rachelle Yusufbekov2, Michele Birgelen1, Lisa Ferrara3, Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski4, Domagoj Coric5,6. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Integrity Implants Inc, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. 3. OrthoKinetic Technologies LLC, Southport, North Carolina. 4. Center for Advanced Spine Care of Southern Arizona and Surgical Institute of Tucson, Arizona. 5. Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina. 6. Atrium Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bidirectional expandable designs for lumbar interbody fusion cages are the latest iteration of expandable spacers employed to address some of the common problems inherent to static interbody fusion cages. OBJECTIVE: To describe the rationales for contemporary bidirectional, multimaterial expandable lumbar interbody fusion cage designs to achieve in situ expansion for maximum anterior column support while decreasing insertion size during minimal-access surgeries. METHODS: The authors summarize the current concepts behind expandable spinal fusion open architecture cage designs focusing on advanced minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques, such as endoscopy. A cage capable of bidirectional expansion in both height and width to address constrained surgical access problems was of particular interest to the authors while they analyzed the relationship between implant material stiffness and geometric design regarding the risk of subsidence and reduced graft loading. CONCLUSIONS: Biomechanical advantages of new bidirectional, multimaterial expandable interbody fusion cages allow insertion through minimal surgical access and combine the advantages of proven device configurations and advanced material selection. The final construct stiffness is sufficient to provide immediate anterior column support while accommodating reduced sizes required for minimally invasive surgery applications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 7. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
BACKGROUND: Bidirectional expandable designs for lumbar interbody fusion cages are the latest iteration of expandable spacers employed to address some of the common problems inherent to static interbody fusion cages. OBJECTIVE: To describe the rationales for contemporary bidirectional, multimaterial expandable lumbar interbody fusion cage designs to achieve in situ expansion for maximum anterior column support while decreasing insertion size during minimal-access surgeries. METHODS: The authors summarize the current concepts behind expandable spinal fusion open architecture cage designs focusing on advanced minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques, such as endoscopy. A cage capable of bidirectional expansion in both height and width to address constrained surgical access problems was of particular interest to the authors while they analyzed the relationship between implant material stiffness and geometric design regarding the risk of subsidence and reduced graft loading. CONCLUSIONS: Biomechanical advantages of new bidirectional, multimaterial expandable interbody fusion cages allow insertion through minimal surgical access and combine the advantages of proven device configurations and advanced material selection. The final construct stiffness is sufficient to provide immediate anterior column support while accommodating reduced sizes required for minimally invasive surgery applications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 7. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
Authors: Robert Pflugmacher; Philipp Schleicher; Jan Schaefer; Matti Scholz; Kathrin Ludwig; Cyrus Khodadadyan-Klostermann; Norbert P Haas; Frank Kandziora Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Frank M Phillips; Michael N Tzermiadianos; Leonard I Voronov; Robert M Havey; Gerard Carandang; Susan M Renner; David M Rosler; Jorge A Ochoa; Avinash G Patwardhan Journal: Spine J Date: 2008-04-25 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: David H Ge; Nicholas D Stekas; Christopher G Varlotta; Charla R Fischer; Anthony Petrizzo; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Peter G Passias; Thomas J Errico; Aaron J Buckland Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 3.468