Literature DB >> 28776264

Why free choices take longer than forced choices: evidence from response threshold manipulations.

Christoph Naefgen1, Michael Dambacher2, Markus Janczyk3.   

Abstract

Response times (RTs) for free choice tasks are usually longer than those for forced choice tasks. We examined the cause for this difference in a study with intermixed free and forced choice trials, and adopted the rationale of sequential sampling frameworks to test two alternative accounts: Longer RTs in free choices are caused (1) by lower rates of information accumulation, or (2) by additional cognitive processes that delay the start of information accumulation. In three experiments, we made these accounts empirically discriminable by manipulating decision thresholds via the frequency of catch trials (Exp. 1) or via inducing time pressure (Exp. 2 and 3). Our results supported the second account, suggesting a temporal delay of information accumulation in free choice tasks, while the accumulation rate remains comparable. We propose that response choice in both tasks relies on information accumulation towards a specific goal. While in forced choice tasks, this goal is externally determined by the stimulus, in free choice tasks, it needs to be generated internally, which requires additional time.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28776264     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0887-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  48 in total

1.  The locus of tool-transformation costs.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde; Roland Pfister; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  Random noun generation in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Markus Janczyk; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  Does temporal preparation increase the rate of sensory information accumulation?

Authors:  Verena C Seibold; Karin M Bausenhart; Bettina Rolke; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2011-03-25

5.  Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection.

Authors:  Florian Waszak; Edmund Wascher; Peter Keller; Iring Koch; Gisa Aschersleben; David A Rosenbaum; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Time course of free-choice priming effects explained by a simple accumulator model.

Authors:  Uwe Mattler; Simon Palmer
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-04-02

7.  The hare and the tortoise: emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions.

Authors:  Babette Rae; Andrew Heathcote; Chris Donkin; Lee Averell; Scott Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism.

Authors:  A G Greenwald
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 9.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith; Scott D Brown; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Instructed task demands and utilization of action effect anticipation.

Authors:  Robert Gaschler; Dieter Nattkemper
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-28
View more
  7 in total

1.  Free choice tasks as random generation tasks: an investigation through working memory manipulations.

Authors:  Christoph Naefgen; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Common mechanisms in error monitoring and action effect monitoring.

Authors:  Robert Steinhauser; Robert Wirth; Wilfried Kunde; Markus Janczyk; Marco Steinhauser
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Response priming with motion primes: negative compatibility or congruency effects, even in free-choice trials.

Authors:  Christina Bermeitinger; Ryan P Hackländer
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-02-24

4.  Are freely chosen actions generated by stimulus codes or effect codes?

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Christoph Naefgen; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Enhancing free choice masked priming via switch trials during repeated practice.

Authors:  Qi Dai; Lichang Yao; Qiong Wu; Yiyang Yu; Wen Li; Jiajia Yang; Satoshi Takahashi; Yoshimichi Ejima; Jinglong Wu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-08

6.  Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: a drift-diffusion model approach.

Authors:  André Mattes; Felice Tavera; Anja Ophey; Mandy Roheger; Robert Gaschler; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-25

7.  Action-Effect Associations in Voluntary and Cued Task-Switching.

Authors:  Angelika Sommer; Sarah Lukas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.