Literature DB >> 25642198

Binocular fusion and invariant category learning due to predictive remapping during scanning of a depthful scene with eye movements.

Stephen Grossberg1, Karthik Srinivasan1, Arash Yazdanbakhsh1.   

Abstract

How does the brain maintain stable fusion of 3D scenes when the eyes move? Every eye movement causes each retinal position to process a different set of scenic features, and thus the brain needs to binocularly fuse new combinations of features at each position after an eye movement. Despite these breaks in retinotopic fusion due to each movement, previously fused representations of a scene in depth often appear stable. The 3D ARTSCAN neural model proposes how the brain does this by unifying concepts about how multiple cortical areas in the What and Where cortical streams interact to coordinate processes of 3D boundary and surface perception, spatial attention, invariant object category learning, predictive remapping, eye movement control, and learned coordinate transformations. The model explains data from single neuron and psychophysical studies of covert visual attention shifts prior to eye movements. The model further clarifies how perceptual, attentional, and cognitive interactions among multiple brain regions (LGN, V1, V2, V3A, V4, MT, MST, PPC, LIP, ITp, ITa, SC) may accomplish predictive remapping as part of the process whereby view-invariant object categories are learned. These results build upon earlier neural models of 3D vision and figure-ground separation and the learning of invariant object categories as the eyes freely scan a scene. A key process concerns how an object's surface representation generates a form-fitting distribution of spatial attention, or attentional shroud, in parietal cortex that helps maintain the stability of multiple perceptual and cognitive processes. Predictive eye movement signals maintain the stability of the shroud, as well as of binocularly fused perceptual boundaries and surface representations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  category learning; depth perception; gain fields; object recognition; perceptual stability; predictive remapping; saccadic eye movements; spatial attention

Year:  2015        PMID: 25642198      PMCID: PMC4294135          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  148 in total

Review 1.  Exploring the consequences of the previous trial.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Transsaccadic memory of position and form.

Authors:  Heiner Deubel; Werner X Schneider; Bruce Bridgeman
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.453

3.  Peak localization of sparsely sampled luminance patterns is based on interpolated 3D surface representation.

Authors:  Lora T Likova; Christopher W Tyler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Stereopsis and 3D surface perception by spiking neurons in laminar cortical circuits: a method for converting neural rate models into spiking models.

Authors:  Yongqiang Cao; Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2011-11-04

5.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.

Authors:  J R Duhamel; C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex.

Authors:  J P Gottlieb; M Kusunoki; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-01-29       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The spatial allocation of visual attention as indexed by event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  G R Mangun; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.888

8.  Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional form, color, and brightness perception: II. Binocular theory.

Authors:  S Grossberg
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-02

9.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry.

Authors:  C Koch; S Ullman
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985

10.  A human parietal face area contains aligned head-centered visual and tactile maps.

Authors:  Martin I Sereno; Ruey-Song Huang
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-24       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  5 in total

1.  A Canonical Laminar Neocortical Circuit Whose Bottom-Up, Horizontal, and Top-Down Pathways Control Attention, Learning, and Prediction.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-23

2.  Cortical Dynamics of Figure-Ground Separation in Response to 2D Pictures and 3D Scenes: How V2 Combines Border Ownership, Stereoscopic Cues, and Gestalt Grouping Rules.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-26

3.  The resonant brain: How attentive conscious seeing regulates action sequences that interact with attentive cognitive learning, recognition, and prediction.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Functional changes in the visual cortex in preoperative and postoperative patients with intermittent exotropia: study protocol for a non-randomised case-control clinical trial.

Authors:  Yanan Guo; Jing Fu; Jie Hong; Zhaohui Liu; Xueying He
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Neural Computation of Surface Border Ownership and Relative Surface Depth from Ambiguous Contrast Inputs.

Authors:  Birgitta Dresp-Langley; Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-07-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.