Literature DB >> 10664779

Perceptual organization of apparent motion in the Ternus display.

Z J He1, T L Ooi.   

Abstract

A typical Ternus display has three sequentially presented frames, in which frame 1 consists of three motion tokens, frame 2 (blank) defines the interstimulus interval, and frame 3 has similar motion tokens with their relative positions shifted to the right. Interestingly, what appears to be a seemingly simple arrangement of stimuli can induce one of two distinct apparent-motion percepts in the observer. The first is an element-motion perception where the left-end token is seen to jump over its two neighboring tokens (inner tokens) to the right end of the display. The second is a group-motion perception where the entire display of the three tokens is seen to move to the right. How does the visual system choose between these two apparent-motion perceptions? It is hypothesized that the choice of motion perception is determined in part by the perceptual organization of the motion tokens. Specifically, a group-motion perception is experienced when a strong grouping tendency exists among the motion tokens belonging to the same frame. Conversely, an element-motion perception is experienced when a strong grouping tendency exists between the inner motion tokens in frames 1 and 3 (i.e. the two tokens that overlap in space between frames). We tested this hypothesis by varying the perceptual organization of the motion tokens. Both spatial (form similarity, 3-D proximity, common surface/common region, and occlusion) and temporal (motion priming) factors of perceptual organization were tested. We found that the apparent-motion perception of the Ternus display can be predictably affected, in a manner consistent with the perceptual organization hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10664779     DOI: 10.1068/p2941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  16 in total

1.  The emergence of visual objects in space-time.

Authors:  S Gepshtein; M Kubovy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues.

Authors:  Robert Rauschenberger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

Review 3.  A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization.

Authors:  Johan Wagemans; James H Elder; Michael Kubovy; Stephen E Palmer; Mary A Peterson; Manish Singh; Rüdiger von der Heydt
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Barrier effects in non-retinotopic feature attribution.

Authors:  Murat Aydın; Michael H Herzog; Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Attention modulates spatio-temporal grouping.

Authors:  Murat Aydın; Michael H Herzog; Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The visible ground surface as a reference frame for scaling binocular depth of a target in midair.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Liu Zhou; Pan Shi; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Boundary contour-based surface integration affected by color.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  A theory of moving form perception: Synergy between masking, perceptual grouping, and motion computation in retinotopic and non-retinotopic representations.

Authors:  Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

9.  The role of spatiotemporal and spectral cues in segregating short sound events: evidence from auditory Ternus display.

Authors:  Qingcui Wang; Ming Bao; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Spatio-temporal priority revisited: the role of feature identity and similarity for object correspondence in apparent motion.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hein; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.