Literature DB >> 10654469

The anatomic basis for the concept of lateralized femoral stems: a frontal plane radiographic study of the proximal femur.

P Massin1, L Geais, E Astoin, M Simondi, F Lavaste.   

Abstract

We determined the range of sizes for a system of monoblock femoral prostheses that would provide adequate (a term defined in the text) fill in the frontal plane and restore femoral offset and leg length. We performed an anatomic study, based on measurements in 200 anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. If diaphyseal filling implants are to be used, 9 sizes are sufficient to obtain excellent canal filling and restoration of femoral offset in >80% of cases, assuming that the level of neck osteotomy can vary over a 1-cm range. When using metaphyseal filling implants, only a limited adjustment can be obtained from the level of neck osteotomy. A system limited to 8 sizes approximates the anatomy of the femoral canal with satisfactory precision in 73% of cases. If such a system is provided with only a single neck shaft angle for each stem size, it does not allow restoration of the biomechanical center of the hip in >67% of cases. A system of 8 sizes of 1 neck/shaft angle and a 22-mm modular head restores the anatomy in only 49% of cases. Approximating the frontal anatomy of 85% of femora with an implant filling the metaphysis requires at least 15 sizes distributed in 3 metaphyseal configurations, each supplied with 2 different neck shalt angles.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10654469     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(00)91337-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  22 in total

Review 1.  The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Jens Dargel; Johannes Oppermann; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer; Jan Bredow; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  What Factors Are Associated With Neck Fracture in One Commonly Used Bimodular THA Design? A Multicenter, Nationwide Study in Slovenia.

Authors:  Simon Kovač; Blaž Mavčič; Marko Kotnik; Vesna Levašič; Mateja Sirše; Samo Karel Fokter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  K-H Widmer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Preoperative digital planning versus postoperative outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using a calcar-guided short stem: frequent valgization can be avoided.

Authors:  Karl Philipp Kutzner; Joachim Pfeil; Mark Predrag Kovacevic
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-08

5.  Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: comparison between modular short-stem hip arthroplasty and conventional total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian Schmidutz; Marc Beirer; Patrick Weber; Farhad Mazoochian; Andreas Fottner; Volkmar Jansson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Anatomy of the proximal femur at the time of total hip arthroplasty is a matter of morphotype and etiology but not gender.

Authors:  Matthieu Ollivier; Sebastien Parratte; Thomas Le Corroller; Thomas Lecorroller; Andrea Reggiori; Pierre Champsaur; Jean-Noël Argenson
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  The tridimensional geometry of the proximal femur should determine the design of cementless femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Julien Wegrzyn; Jean-Paul Roux; Charlotte Loriau; Nicolas Bonin; Vincent Pibarot
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Femoral head diameter in the Malaysian population.

Authors:  Chee Kean Lee; Mun Keong Kwan; Azhar Mahmood Merican; Wuey Min Ng; Lim Beng Saw; Kok Kheng Teh; Manoharan Krishnan; Ramanathan Ramiah
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.858

9.  [Change of offset after implantation of hip alloarthroplasties].

Authors:  J Jerosch; S Funken
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Custom cementless stem improves hip function in young patients at 15-year followup.

Authors:  Xavier Flecher; Oliver Pearce; Sebastien Parratte; Jean-Manuel Aubaniac; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.