Literature DB >> 10653881

Surveillance for recurrent head and neck cancer using positron emission tomography.

V J Lowe1, J H Boyd, F R Dunphy, H Kim, T Dunleavy, B T Collins, D Martin, B C Stack, C Hollenbeak, J W Fletcher.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Earlier detection of head and neck cancer recurrence may improve survival. We evaluated the ability of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to detect recurrence in a prospective trial using sequential PET scans. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serial posttherapy FDG-PET was prospectively performed in 44 patients with stage III or IV head and neck cancer. PET was performed twice during the first posttreatment year (at 2 and 10 months after therapy) and thereafter as needed. After therapy, patients were grouped, based on tissue biopsies, into those who achieved a complete response (CR) and those who had residual disease (RD). Patients who achieved a CR were further grouped into those without evidence of disease and those who had recurrence by 1 year after completion of therapy. Disease status as determined by physical examination (PE), PET, and correlative imaging was compared.
RESULTS: Eight patients were lost to follow-up and six had RD after therapy. Of the remaining 30 patients with a CR, 16 had recurrence in the first year after therapy. Five of these 16 patients had recurrence detected by PET only, four by PET and correlative imaging only, five by PE and PET only, and two by PE, correlative imaging, and PET. Only PET detected all recurrences in the first year. PET performed better than correlative imaging (P =.013) or PE (P =.002) in the detection of recurrence.
CONCLUSION: PET can detect head and neck tumor recurrence when it may be undetectable by other clinical methods. FDG-PET permits highly accurate detection of head and neck cancer recurrence in the posttherapy period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10653881     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.3.651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  28 in total

1.  Posttreatment Imaging in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer without Clinical Evidence of Recurrence: Should Surveillance Imaging Extend Beyond 6 Months?

Authors:  A Gore; K Baugnon; J Beitler; N F Saba; M R Patel; X Wu; B J Boyce; A H Aiken
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Multicentre assessment and monitored use of [(18)F]FDG-PET in oncology: the Spanish experience.

Authors:  Manuel Rodríguez-Garrido; Cristina Asensio-del-Barrio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Comparison of positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging and ultrasound in surveillance of head and neck cancer - The 3-year experience of the ENT Department in Poznan.

Authors:  Małgorzata Wierzbicka; Mariola Popko; Karolina Piskadło; Rafał Czepczyński; Aleksandra Stankowska; Tomasz Piętka; Mirosław Dziuk; Witold Szyfter
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-09-29

Review 4.  Functional imaging in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  David I Kutler; Richard J Wong; Dennis H Kraus
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tejpal Gupta; Zubin Master; Sadhana Kannan; Jai Prakash Agarwal; Sarbani Ghsoh-Laskar; Venkatesh Rangarajan; Vedang Murthy; Ashwini Budrukkar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Response assessment by combined PET-CT scan versus CT scan alone using RECIST in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  V A Passero; B F Branstetter; Y Shuai; D E Heron; M K Gibson; S Y Lai; S W Kim; J R Grandis; R L Ferris; J T Johnson; A Argiris
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  PET Scan in Head and Neck Tumours in a Developing Country Like India: Is It a Must?

Authors:  Neeti Madan Kapre; Jyoti Pralhad Dabholkar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-11-28

8.  Change of maximum standardized uptake value slope in dynamic triphasic [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography distinguishes malignancy from postradiation inflammation in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective trial.

Authors:  Carryn M Anderson; Tangel Chang; Michael M Graham; Michael D Marquardt; Anna Button; Brian J Smith; Yusuf Menda; Wenqing Sun; Nitin A Pagedar; John M Buatti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Glucose deprivation-induced metabolic oxidative stress and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Andrean L Simons; David M Mattson; Ken Dornfeld; Douglas R Spitz
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.805

10.  The lack of evidence for PET or PET/CT surveillance of patients with treated lymphoma, colorectal cancer, and head and neck cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kamal Patel; Nira Hadar; Jounghee Lee; Barry A Siegel; Bruce E Hillner; Joseph Lau
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.