Literature DB >> 25680593

Change of maximum standardized uptake value slope in dynamic triphasic [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography distinguishes malignancy from postradiation inflammation in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective trial.

Carryn M Anderson1, Tangel Chang2, Michael M Graham3, Michael D Marquardt2, Anna Button4, Brian J Smith4, Yusuf Menda3, Wenqing Sun2, Nitin A Pagedar5, John M Buatti2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate dynamic [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake methodology as a post-radiation therapy (RT) response assessment tool, potentially enabling accurate tumor and therapy-related inflammation differentiation, improving the posttherapy value of FDG-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We prospectively enrolled head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma patients who completed RT, with scheduled 3-month post-RT FDG-PET/CT. Patients underwent our standard whole-body PET/CT scan at 90 minutes, with the addition of head-and-neck PET/CT scans at 60 and 120 minutes. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUV(max)) of regions of interest were measured at 60, 90, and 120 minutes. The SUV(max) slope between 60 and 120 minutes and change of SUV(max) slope before and after 90 minutes were calculated. Data were analyzed by primary site and nodal site disease status using the Cox regression model and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Outcomes were based on pathologic and clinical follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were enrolled, with 79 primary and 43 nodal evaluable sites. Twenty-eight sites were interpreted as positive or equivocal (18 primary, 8 nodal, 2 distant) on 3-month 90-minute FDG-PET/CT. Median follow-up was 13.3 months. All measured SUV endpoints predicted recurrence. Change of SUV(max) slope after 90 minutes more accurately identified nonrecurrence in positive or equivocal sites than our current standard of SUV(max) ≥2.5 (P=.02).
CONCLUSIONS: The positive predictive value of post-RT FDG-PET/CT may significantly improve using novel second derivative analysis of dynamic triphasic FDG-PET/CT SUV(max) slope, accurately distinguishing tumor from inflammation on positive and equivocal scans.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25680593      PMCID: PMC4335357          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  33 in total

1.  Surveillance for recurrent head and neck cancer using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  V J Lowe; J H Boyd; F R Dunphy; H Kim; T Dunleavy; B T Collins; D Martin; B C Stack; C Hollenbeak; J W Fletcher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Optimizing imaging time for improved performance in oncology PET studies.

Authors:  Joseph A Thie; Karl F Hubner; Gary T Smith
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tejpal Gupta; Zubin Master; Sadhana Kannan; Jai Prakash Agarwal; Sarbani Ghsoh-Laskar; Venkatesh Rangarajan; Vedang Murthy; Ashwini Budrukkar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Value of FDG PET in assessment of treatment response and surveillance in head-and-neck cancer patients after intensity modulated radiation treatment: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Min Yao; Michael M Graham; Russell B Smith; Kenneth J Dornfeld; Mark Skwarchuk; Henry T Hoffman; Gerry F Funk; Scott M Graham; Yusuf Menda; John M Buatti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  The use of multiple time point dynamic positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with oral/head and neck cancer does not predictably identify metastatic cervical lymph nodes.

Authors:  Eric R Carlson; Josh Schaefferkoetter; David Townsend; J Michael McCoy; Paul D Campbell; Misty Long
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Is planned neck dissection necessary for head and neck cancer after intensity-modulated radiotherapy?

Authors:  Min Yao; Henry T Hoffman; Kristi Chang; Gerry F Funk; Russell B Smith; Huaming Tan; Gerald H Clamon; Ken Dornfeld; John M Buatti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  FDG PET/CT in oncology: "raising the bar".

Authors:  C N Patel; A R Goldstone; F U Chowdhury; A F Scarsbrook
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group.

Authors:  H Young; R Baum; U Cremerius; K Herholz; O Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma; J Pruim; P Price
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Dual-time point 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for differentiation between 18F-FDG-avid non-small cell lung cancer and benign lesions.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Suga; Yasuhiko Kawakami; Atsuto Hiyama; Kazurou Sugi; Kazutomo Okabe; Tsuneo Matsumoto; Kazuhiro Ueda; Nobuyuki Tanaka; Naofumi Matsunaga
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.668

10.  Pathology and FDG PET correlation of residual lymph nodes in head and neck cancer after radiation treatment.

Authors:  Min Yao; Pifu Luo; Henry T Hoffman; Kristi Chang; Michael M Graham; Yusuf Menda; Huaming Tan; John M Buatti
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.339

View more
  9 in total

1.  Qualitative interpretation of PET scans using a Likert scale to assess neck node response to radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Johanna Sjövall; Ulrika Bitzén; Elisabeth Kjellén; Per Nilsson; Peter Wahlberg; Eva Brun
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  (18)F-FDG PET/CT to assess response and guide risk-stratified follow-up after chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas Bird; Sally Barrington; Selvam Thavaraj; Jean-Pierre Jeannon; Andrew Lyons; Richard Oakley; Ricard Simo; Mary Lei; Teresa Guerrero Urbano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Potential Role of PET/MRI for Imaging Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Sungheon Gene Kim; Kent Friedman; Sohil Patel; Mari Hagiwara
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Predictive medicine: towards a multi-parametric imaging for a personal risk stratification.

Authors:  Eric Guedj; Serge Cammilleri; Antoine Verger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Dual time point imaging in locally advanced head and neck cancer to assess residual nodal disease after chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Frederik Soffers; Nils Helsen; Tim Van den Wyngaert; Laurens Carp; Otto S Hoekstra; Laurence Goethals; Michel Martens; Kristof Deben; Karoline Spaepen; Remco De Bree; Frank De Geeter; G J C Zwezerijnen; Carl Van Laer; Alex Maes; Olivier Lenssen; Sigrid Stroobants
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.434

6.  Dual-time-point PET/CT study protocol can improve the larynx cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Agata Karolina Pietrzak; Joanna Kazmierska; Andrzej Marszalek; Pawel Golusinski; Aleksandra Heydrych; Katarzyna Wiechec; Witold Cholewinski
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-04-28

7.  FDG PET based prediction of response in head and neck cancer treatment: Assessment of new quantitative imaging features.

Authors:  Reinhard R Beichel; Ethan J Ulrich; Brian J Smith; Christian Bauer; Bartley Brown; Thomas Casavant; John J Sunderland; Michael M Graham; John M Buatti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Opportunities and Limits in Salvage Surgery in Persistent or Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Gerhard Frank Huber
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  End of treatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is predictive of radiation response and overall survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Whitney Sumner; Sangwoo S Kim; Lucas Vitzthum; Kevin Moore; Todd Atwood; James Murphy; Sayuri Miyauchi; Joseph A Califano; Loren K Mell; Arno J Mundt; Andrew B Sharabi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.