Literature DB >> 10641658

Basilar-membrane nonlinearity estimated by pulsation threshold.

C J Plack1, A J Oxenham.   

Abstract

The pulsation threshold technique was used to estimate the basilar-membrane (BM) response to a tone at characteristic frequency (CF). A pure-tone signal was alternated with a pure-tone masker. The frequency of the masker was 0.6 times that of the signal. For signal levels from around 20 dB above absolute threshold to 85 dB SPL, the masker level was varied to find the level at which a transition occurred between the signal being perceived as "pulsed" or "continuous" (the pulsation threshold). The transition is assumed to occur when the masker excitation is somewhat greater than the signal excitation at the place on the BM tuned to the signal. If it is assumed further that the response at this place to the lower-frequency masker is linear, then the shape of the masking function provides an estimate of the BM response to the signal. Signal frequencies of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz were tested. The mean slopes of the masking functions for signal levels between 50 and 80 dB SPL were 0.76, 0.50, 0.34, 0.32, 0.35, and 0.41, respectively. The results suggest that compression on the BM increases between CFs of 0.25 and 1 kHz and is roughly constant for frequencies of 1 kHz and above. Despite requiring a subjective criterion, the pulsation threshold measurements had a reasonably low variability. However, the estimated compression was less than in an earlier study using forward masking. The smaller amount of compression observed here may be due to the effects of off-frequency listening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10641658     DOI: 10.1121/1.428318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Forward masking additivity and auditory compression at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Catherine G O'Hanlon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-09

2.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

3.  Recovery from on- and off-frequency forward masking in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Global not local masker features govern the auditory continuity illusion.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing AIDS.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-03

6.  Illusory auditory continuity despite neural evidence to the contrary.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  The Hearing-Aid Audio Quality Index (HAAQI).

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2015-12-10

8.  Perceptual asymmetry induced by the auditory continuity illusion.

Authors:  Dorea R Ruggles; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  On the controversy about the sharpness of human cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Almudena Eustaquio-Martin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-21

10.  Comparison of the roex and gammachirp filters as representations of the auditory filter.

Authors:  Masashi Unoki; Toshio Irino; Brian Glasberg; Brian C J Moore; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.