Literature DB >> 22457512

Global not local masker features govern the auditory continuity illusion.

Lars Riecke1, Christophe Micheyl, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

When an acoustic signal is temporarily interrupted by another sound, it is sometimes heard as continuing through, even when the signal is actually turned off during the interruption-an effect known as the "auditory continuity illusion." A widespread view is that the illusion can only occur when peripheral neural responses contain no evidence that the signal was interrupted. Here we challenge this view using a combination of psychophysical measures from human listeners and computational simulations with a model of the auditory periphery. The results reveal that the illusion seems to depend more on the overall specific loudness than on the peripheral masking properties of the interrupting sound. This finding indicates that the continuity illusion is determined by the global features, rather than the fine-grained temporal structure, of the interrupting sound, and argues against the view that the illusion arises in the auditory periphery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22457512      PMCID: PMC3357484          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6261-11.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  36 in total

1.  Basilar-membrane nonlinearity estimated by pulsation threshold.

Authors:  C J Plack; A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Towards a measure of auditory-filter phase response.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; T Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Psychophysical estimates of cochlear phase response: masking by harmonic complexes.

Authors:  J J Lentz; M R Leek
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-12

4.  Reconciling frequency selectivity and phase effects in masking.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; T Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Basilar-membrane responses to multicomponent (Schroeder-phase) signals: understanding intensity effects.

Authors:  Van Summers; Egbert de Boer; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The neurophysiological basis of the auditory continuity illusion: a mismatch negativity study.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Robert P Carlyon; Yury Shtyrov; Olaf Hauk; Tara Dodson; Friedemann Pullvermüller
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  A computational model for rate-level functions from cat auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  M B Sachs; R L Winslow; B H Sokolowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Auditory induction: perceptual synthesis of absent sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren; C J Obusek; J M Ackroff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Illusory sound perception in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Christopher I Petkov; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The what, where and how of auditory-object perception.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Illusory auditory continuity despite neural evidence to the contrary.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Perceptual asymmetry induced by the auditory continuity illusion.

Authors:  Dorea R Ruggles; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Low-frequency oscillations reflect aberrant tone restoration during the auditory continuity illusion in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Joseph Wooldridge; Mathis Kaiser; Yadira Roa Romero; Lars Riecke; Julian Keil; Daniel Senkowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.