Literature DB >> 10641021

Prognostic models based on literature and individual patient data in logistic regression analysis.

E W Steyerberg1, M J Eijkemans, J C Van Houwelingen, K L Lee, J D Habbema.   

Abstract

Prognostic models can be developed with multiple regression analysis of a data set containing individual patient data. Often this data set is relatively small, while previously published studies present results for larger numbers of patients. We describe a method to combine univariable regression results from the medical literature with univariable and multivariable results from the data set containing individual patient data. This 'adaptation method' exploits the generally strong correlation between univariable and multivariable regression coefficients. The method is illustrated with several logistic regression models to predict 30-day mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The regression coefficients showed considerably less variability when estimated with the adaptation method, compared to standard maximum likelihood estimates. Also, model performance, as distinguished in calibration and discrimination, improved clearly when compared to models including shrunk or penalized estimates. We conclude that prognostic models may benefit substantially from explicit incorporation of literature data. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10641021     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000130)19:2<141::aid-sim334>3.0.co;2-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  22 in total

1.  Non-Bayesian knowledge propagation using model-based analysis of data from multiple clinical studies.

Authors:  Jakob Ribbing; Andrew C Hooker; E Niclas Jonsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Informing a Risk Prediction Model for Binary Outcomes with External Coefficient Information.

Authors:  Wenting Cheng; Jeremy M G Taylor; Tian Gu; Scott A Tomlins; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 1.864

3.  Predicting who will undergo surgery after physiotherapy for female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  J Labrie; A L M Lagro-Janssen; K Fischer; L C M Berghmans; C H van der Vaart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Coronary artery disease risk reduction in HIV-infected persons: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Nwora Lance Okeke; Tammy Chin; Meredith Clement; Shein-Chung Chow; Charles B Hicks
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2015-10-19

5.  Longitudinal evaluation of CA-125 velocity and prediction of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jian-Lun Xu; John Commins; Edward Partridge; Thomas L Riley; Philip C Prorok; Christine C Johnson; Saundra S Buys
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Predicting venous thromboembolism in multiple myeloma: development and validation of the IMPEDE VTE score.

Authors:  Kristen M Sanfilippo; Suhong Luo; Tzu-Fei Wang; Mark Fiala; Martin Schoen; Tanya M Wildes; Joseph Mikhael; Nicole M Kuderer; David C Calverley; Jesse Keller; Theodore Thomas; Kenneth R Carson; Brian F Gage
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 10.047

7.  Systematically missing confounders in individual participant data meta-analysis of observational cohort studies.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Ian White; J B Kostis; A C Wilson; A R Folsom; K Wu; L Chambless; M Benderly; U Goldbourt; J Willeit; S Kiechl; J W G Yarnell; P M Sweetnam; P C Elwood; M Cushman; B M Psaty; R P Tracy; A Tybjaerg-Hansen; F Haverkate; M P M de Maat; S G Thompson; F G R Fowkes; A J Lee; F B Smith; V Salomaa; K Harald; V Rasi; E Vahtera; P Jousilahti; R D'Agostino; W B Kannel; P W F Wilson; G Tofler; D Levy; R Marchioli; F Valagussa; A Rosengren; L Wilhelmsen; G Lappas; H Eriksson; P Cremer; D Nagel; J D Curb; B Rodriguez; K Yano; J T Salonen; K Nyyssönen; T-P Tuomainen; B Hedblad; G Engström; G Berglund; H Loewel; W Koenig; H W Hense; T W Meade; J A Cooper; B De Stavola; C Knottenbelt; G J Miller; J A Cooper; K A Bauer; R D Rosenberg; S Sato; A Kitamura; Y Naito; H Iso; V Salomaa; K Harald; V Rasi; E Vahtera; P Jousilahti; T Palosuo; P Ducimetiere; P Amouyel; D Arveiler; A E Evans; J Ferrieres; I Juhan-Vague; A Bingham; H Schulte; G Assmann; B Cantin; B Lamarche; J-P Despres; G R Dagenais; H Tunstall-Pedoe; G D O Lowe; M Woodward; Y Ben-Shlomo; G Davey Smith; V Palmieri; J L Yeh; T W Meade; A Rudnicka; P Brennan; C Knottenbelt; J A Cooper; P Ridker; F Rodeghiero; A Tosetto; J Shepherd; G D O Lowe; I Ford; M Robertson; E Brunner; M Shipley; E J M Feskens; E Di Angelantonio; S Kaptoge; S Lewington; G D O Lowe; N Sarwar; S G Thompson; M Walker; S Watson; I R White; A M Wood; J Danesh
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Incorporating published univariable associations in diagnostic and prognostic modeling.

Authors:  Thomas P A Debray; Hendrik Koffijberg; Difei Lu; Yvonne Vergouwe; Ewout W Steyerberg; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Individual participant data meta-analysis for a binary outcome: one-stage or two-stage?

Authors:  Thomas P A Debray; Karel G M Moons; Ghada Mohammed Abdallah Abo-Zaid; Hendrik Koffijberg; Richard David Riley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Variable selection under multiple imputation using the bootstrap in a prognostic study.

Authors:  Martijn W Heymans; Stef van Buuren; Dirk L Knol; Willem van Mechelen; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.