Literature DB >> 31105344

Informing a Risk Prediction Model for Binary Outcomes with External Coefficient Information.

Wenting Cheng1, Jeremy M G Taylor1, Tian Gu1, Scott A Tomlins1, Bhramar Mukherjee1.   

Abstract

We consider a situation where there is rich historical data available for the coefficients and their standard errors in an established regression model describing the association between a binary outcome variable Y and a set of predicting factors X, from a large study. We would like to utilize this summary information for improving estimation and prediction in an expanded model of interest, Y| X, B. The additional variable B is a new biomarker, measured on a small number of subjects in a new dataset. We develop and evaluate several approaches for translating the external information into constraints on regression coefficients in a logistic regression model of Y| X, B. Borrowing from the measurement error literature we establish an approximate relationship between the regression coefficients in the models Pr(Y = 1| X , β), Pr(Y = 1| X, B, γ) and E(B| X, θ ) for a Gaussian distribution of B. For binary B we propose an alternate expression. The simulation results comparing these methods indicate that historical information on Pr(Y = 1| X , β) can improve the efficiency of estimation and enhance the predictive power in the regression model of interest Pr(Y = 1| X, B, γ). We illustrate our methodology by enhancing the High-grade Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator, with two new biomarkers prostate cancer antigen 3 and TMPRSS2:ERG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian methods; Constrained estimation; Logistic regression; Prediction models

Year:  2018        PMID: 31105344      PMCID: PMC6519970          DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat        ISSN: 0035-9254            Impact factor:   1.864


  15 in total

1.  Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Chen Chi; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Ziding Feng; Howard L Parnes; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression.

Authors:  Georg Heinze; Michael Schemper
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino; S Grundy; L M Sullivan; P Wilson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Prognostic models based on literature and individual patient data in logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  E W Steyerberg; M J Eijkemans; J C Van Houwelingen; K L Lee; J D Habbema
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A simple-to-use method incorporating genomic markers into prostate cancer risk prediction tools facilitated future validation.

Authors:  Sonja Grill; Mahdi Fallah; Robin J Leach; Ian M Thompson; Kari Hemminki; Donna P Ankerst
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  A transformation approach for incorporating monotone or unimodal constraints.

Authors:  Laura H Gunn; David B Dunson
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist approaches to incorporating external information for the prediction of prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Paul J Newcombe; Brian H Reck; Jielin Sun; Greg T Platek; Claudio Verzilli; A Karim Kader; Seong-Tae Kim; Fang-Chi Hsu; Zheng Zhang; S Lilly Zheng; Vincent E Mooser; Lynn D Condreay; Colin F Spraggs; John C Whittaker; Roger S Rittmaster; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; Nancy R Cook; Thomas Gerds; Mithat Gonen; Nancy Obuchowski; Michael J Pencina; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Assessment of clinical validity of a breast cancer risk model combining genetic and clinical information.

Authors:  Matthew E Mealiffe; Renee P Stokowski; Brian K Rhees; Ross L Prentice; Mary Pettinger; David A Hinds
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Toward the detection of prostate cancer in urine: a critical analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Truong; Bing Yang; David F Jarrard
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 7.600

View more
  3 in total

1.  Generalized meta-analysis for multiple regression models across studies with disparate covariate information.

Authors:  Prosenjit Kundu; Runlong Tang; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  Synthetic data method to incorporate external information into a current study.

Authors:  Tian Gu; Jeremy M G Taylor; Wenting Cheng; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  Can J Stat       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 0.875

3.  Integrative analysis of multiple case-control studies.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Lu Deng; William Wheeler; Jing Qin; Kai Yu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 1.701

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.