Literature DB >> 25069638

Predicting who will undergo surgery after physiotherapy for female stress urinary incontinence.

J Labrie1, A L M Lagro-Janssen, K Fischer, L C M Berghmans, C H van der Vaart.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To predict who will undergo midurethral sling surgery (surgery) after initial pelvic floor muscle training (physiotherapy) for stress urinary incontinence in women.
METHODS: This was a cohort study including women with moderate to severe stress incontinence who were allocated to the physiotherapy arm from a previously reported multicentre trial comparing initial surgery or initial physiotherapy in treating stress urinary incontinence. Crossover to surgery was allowed.
RESULTS: Data from 198/230 women who were randomized to physiotherapy was available for analysis, of whom 97/198 (49 %) crossed over to surgery. Prognostic factors for undergoing surgery after physiotherapy were age <55 years at baseline (OR 2.87; 95 % CI 1.30-6.32), higher educational level (OR 3.28; 95 % CI 0.80-13.47), severe incontinence at baseline according to the Sandvik index (OR 1.77; 95 % CI 0.95-3.29) and Urogenital Distress Inventory; incontinence domain score (OR 1.03; per point; 95 % CI 1.01-1.65). Furthermore, there was interaction between age <55 years and higher educational level (OR 0.09; 95 % CI 0.02-0.46). Using these variables we constructed a prediction rule to estimate the risk of surgery after initial physiotherapy.
CONCLUSION: In women with moderate to severe stress incontinence, individual prediction for surgery after initial physiotherapy is possible, thus enabling shared decision making for the choice between initial conservative or invasive management of stress urinary incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25069638     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2473-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  23 in total

1.  Prognostic modelling with logistic regression analysis: a comparison of selection and estimation methods in small data sets.

Authors:  E W Steyerberg; M J Eijkemans; F E Harrell; J D Habbema
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Matthew D Barber; Christopher R Chapple; Elisabetta Costantini; Vincenzo Ficarra; Paul Hilton; Carl G Nilsson; David Waltregny
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Conservative treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: who will benefit?

Authors:  G Truijen; J J Wyndaele; J Weyler
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2001

4.  Long-term efficacy of nonsurgical urinary incontinence treatment in elderly women.

Authors:  M W Weinberger; B M Goodman; M Carnes
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Who will benefit from pelvic floor muscle training for stress urinary incontinence?

Authors:  Hendrik Cammu; Michelle Van Nylen; Christophe Blockeel; Leon Kaufman; Jean-Jacques Amy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Effects of pelvic floor muscle training on strength and predictors of response in the treatment of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  J P Theofrastous; J F Wyman; R C Bump; D K McClish; D M Elser; D R Bland; J A Fantl
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

7.  Surgery versus physiotherapy for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Julien Labrie; Bary L C M Berghmans; Kathelijn Fischer; Alfredo L Milani; Ileana van der Wijk; Dina J C Smalbraak; Astrid Vollebregt; René P Schellart; Giuseppe C M Graziosi; J Marinus van der Ploeg; Joseph F G M Brouns; E Stella M Tiersma; Annette G Groenendijk; Piet Scholten; Ben Willem Mol; Elisabeth E Blokhuis; Albert H Adriaanse; Aaltje Schram; Jan-Paul W R Roovers; Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen; Carl H van der Vaart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Measuring health-related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: the urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited.

Authors:  C Huub van der Vaart; J Rob J de Leeuw; Jan-Paul W R Roovers; A Peter M Heintz
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.696

9.  Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence.

Authors:  Ilker Yalcin; Richard C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey.

Authors:  H Sandvik; S Hunskaar; A Seim; R Hermstad; A Vanvik; H Bratt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  5 in total

1.  Pelvic floor morphometry: a predictor of success of pelvic floor muscle training for women with stress and mixed urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Chantale Dumoulin; An Tang; Stéphanie Pontbriand-Drolet; Stephanie J Madill; Mélanie Morin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Association of baseline severity of lower urinary tract symptoms with the success conservative therapy for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Aneta Obloza; Roderick Teo; Emily Marriott; Gillian Parker; Douglas Tincello
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Self-management of incontinence using a free mobile app: factors associated with improvement.

Authors:  Emma Nyström; Lars Söderström; Eva Samuelsson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 1.932

4.  App-based pelvic floor muscle training in pregnant and postnatal women: A prospective cohort study exploring factors associated with prevention and improvement of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Erika Löjdahl; Anna Lindam; Ina Asklund
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-18

5.  Non-face-to-face treatment of stress urinary incontinence: predictors of success after 1 year.

Authors:  Anna Lindh; Malin Sjöström; Hans Stenlund; Eva Samuelsson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.894

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.