Literature DB >> 10640367

Avian dependence on sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue.

.   

Abstract

Sound pressure level (SPL) has received little attention as a distance cue or signal for communication because of the methodological difficulty of determining source SPL from free-ranging signallers and because SPL is presumed to be unreliable as a distance cue. Eastern towhees, Pipilo erythrophthalmus (Emberizidae, Passeriformes), in south-central Florida give a simple call during territorial interactions. I obtained measurements of call-source SPL with a calibrated microphone positioned 100+/-10 cm from caged male eastern towhees. Measurements of source SPL were highly variable, but much of this variation can be predicted from measurements of call duration or call frequency variables (spectrotemporal variables). Male towhees accurately perceived the distance of a speaker after it played synthetic calls that matched the amplitude and structure of natural 84-dB and 78-dB call types. Subjects flew further in response to an attenuated (-6 or -12 dB) version of an otherwise identical 84-dB call and flew shorter in response to an amplified (+6 dB) version of this same call. Towhees misjudged speaker distance in approximately half of the trials that included a discrepancy (-6, -12 or +6 dB SPL) between playback source SPL and predicted spectrotemporal variables. These distance errors suggest that towhees assess auditory distance partly from the difference between perceived SPL and source SPL, determined from spectrotemporal variables. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10640367     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  10 in total

1.  Sex differences in auditory filters of brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater).

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  A broad filter between call frequency and peripheral auditory sensitivity in northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster).

Authors:  Dana M Green; Tucker Scolman; O'neil W Guthrie; Bret Pasch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Cooperative vocal control in marmoset monkeys via vocal feedback.

Authors:  Jung Yoon Choi; Daniel Y Takahashi; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Methylmercury Exposure Reduces the Auditory Brainstem Response of Zebra Finches (Taeniopygia guttata ).

Authors:  Sarah E Wolf; John P Swaddle; Daniel A Cristol; William J Buchser
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-30

5.  On the relation between loudness and the increased song frequency of urban birds.

Authors:  Gonçalo C Cardoso; Jonathan W Atwell
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  On amplitude and frequency in birdsong: a reply to Zollinger et al.

Authors:  Gonçalo C Cardoso; Jonathan W Atwell
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Context-dependent effects of noise on echolocation pulse characteristics in free-tailed bats.

Authors:  Jedediah Tressler; Michael S Smotherman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Bird song and anthropogenic noise: vocal constraints may explain why birds sing higher-frequency songs in cities.

Authors:  Erwin Nemeth; Nadia Pieretti; Sue Anne Zollinger; Nicole Geberzahn; Jesko Partecke; Ana Catarina Miranda; Henrik Brumm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Acoustic ranging in poison frogs-it is not about signal amplitude alone.

Authors:  Max Ringler; Georgine Szipl; Walter Hödl; Leander Khil; Barbara Kofler; Michael Lonauer; Christina Provin; Eva Ringler
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  White-crowned sparrow males show immediate flexibility in song amplitude but not in song minimum frequency in response to changes in noise levels in the field.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Derryberry; Katherine Gentry; Graham E Derryberry; Jennifer N Phillips; Raymond M Danner; Julie E Danner; David A Luther
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.