Literature DB >> 10639034

Pharmacokinetics of 1M gadobutrol in patients with chronic renal failure.

B Tombach1, C Bremer, P Reimer, R M Schaefer, W Ebert, V Geens, W Heindel.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the pharmacokinetics of 1M gadobutrol as a new neutral MR contrast agent in patients with impaired renal function.
METHODS: Twenty-one patients with impaired renal function and any indication for a contrast-enhanced MRI were enrolled into this prospective study and classified in two subgroups according to their creatinine clearance (group 1, 30-80 mL/ min; group 2, 30 mL/min or less, not requiring dialysis). Eleven patients were assigned to the lower dose of 0.1 mmol Gd/kg and 10 patients to the higher dose of 0.3 mmol Gd/kg. To calculate pharmacokinetic parameters, urine and venous blood samples were drawn at baseline and up to 72 hours for group 1 and 120 hours for group 2 after administration of gadobutrol.
RESULTS: The predominant extracellular distribution of gadobutrol at steady state did not change according to the degree of renal impairment. The mean elimination half-life of gadobutrol increased to 7.4 +/- 2.6 hours (0.1 mmol/kg) and 5.4 +/- 1.5 hour (0.3 mmol/kg) in group 1 and to 17.9 +/- 6.2 hours (0.1 mmol/kg) and 20.4 +/- 16.9 hours (0.3 mmol/kg) in group 2, compared with 1.5 hours in healthy volunteers. The relation between serum (tbeta) and urine (t(elim)) elimination half-lives, as well as total serum and renal clearance, indicated renal elimination as the main pathway of elimination. The recovery of gadobutrol in the urine of group 1 was complete within 72 hours for both dosage levels. Patients with severe renal impairment showed a mean recovery of 80.1% (0.1 mmol/kg) and 85.3% (0.3 mmol/kg) within the observation period of 120 hours.
CONCLUSIONS: The half-life of gadobutrol is prolonged in patients with impaired renal function, but elimination by means of the kidneys is the predominant route.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10639034     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200001000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  19 in total

1.  Persistence of gadolinium in CSF: a diagnostic pitfall in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  A T Rai; J P Hogg
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Alternatives to gadolinium-based metal chelates for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Subha Viswanathan; Zoltan Kovacs; Kayla N Green; S James Ratnakar; A Dean Sherry
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Gadobutrol: a review of its use for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in adults and children.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis is low in patients with chronic liver disease exposed to gadolinium-based contrast agents.

Authors:  Emmanuil Smorodinsky; David S Ansdell; Zeke W Foster; Sameer M Mazhar; Irene Cruite; Tanya Wolfson; Sebastian B Sugay; Gabriella Iussich; Masoud Shiehmorteza; Yuko Kono; Alexander Kuo; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Chemistry of MRI Contrast Agents: Current Challenges and New Frontiers.

Authors:  Jessica Wahsner; Eric M Gale; Aurora Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 6.  Biodistribution of gadolinium-based contrast agents, including gadolinium deposition.

Authors:  Silvio Aime; Peter Caravan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  One-molar gadolinium chelate (gadobutrol) as a contrast agent for CT angiography of the thoracic and abdominal aorta.

Authors:  José M Esteban; Antonio Alonso; Vicente Cervera; Vicente Martínez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Biochemical safety profiles of gadolinium-based extracellular contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.

Authors:  Hale Ersoy; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Comparison of 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M gadopentate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI in 471 patients with known or suspected renal lesions: results of a multicenter, single-blind, interindividual, randomized clinical phase III trial.

Authors:  Bernd Tombach; Klaus Bohndorf; Wolfgang Brodtrager; Claus D Claussen; Christoph Düber; Michael Galanski; Eckhardt Grabbe; Giacomo Gortenuti; Michael Kuhn; Walter Gross-Fengels; Renate Hammerstingl; Brigitte Happel; Gertraud Heinz-Peer; Gregor Jung; Thomas Kittner; Roberto Lagalla; Philipp Lengsfeld; Reinhard Loose; Raymond H G Oyen; Pietro Pavlica; Christiane Pering; Roberto Pozzi-Mucelli; Thorsten Persigehl; Peter Reimer; Nomdo S Renken; Götz M Richter; Ernst J Rummeny; Fritz Schäfer; Malgorzata Szczerbo-Trojanowska; Andrzej Urbanik; Thomas J Vogl; Paul Hajek
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Comparison between a linear versus a macrocyclic contrast agent for whole body MR angiography in a clinical routine setting.

Authors:  Achim Seeger; Ulrich Kramer; Michael Fenchel; Florian Grimm; Christiane Bretschneider; Jörg Döring; Bernhard Klumpp; Gunnar Tepe; Kilian Rittig; Peter R Seidensticker; Claus D Claussen; Stephan Miller
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.