Literature DB >> 10632031

Subjective magnitude of tactile roughness.

R T Verrillo1, S J Bolanowski, F P McGlone.   

Abstract

The subjective experience of tactile roughness was judged by subjects using the method of absolute magnitude estimation (AME). The stimuli were 11 grades of sandpaper having particle diameters ranging from 16 to 905 microm. All of the estimates resulted in power functions when assigned numbers were plotted as a function of particle diameter. It was determined that on the finger pad of the index finger and the thumb there was no difference between the active and passive modes of stimulation and that there was no difference in roughness estimates made on the finger and on the thumb. When the finger and thumb were stimulated simultaneously, higher numbers were assigned for a given stimulus indicating the presence of a form of spatial summation at these sites. The pleasantness of the tactile sensation, as assessed using AME, was inversely related to the roughness estimates. Furthermore, hydration of the stratum corneum with water and three concentrations of surfactant solutions reduced the sensation of roughness below that of normally hydrated skin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10632031     DOI: 10.1080/08990229970401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res        ISSN: 0899-0220            Impact factor:   1.111


  22 in total

1.  Tactile dominance in speeded discrimination of textures.

Authors:  Steve Guest; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of changing skin mechanics on the differential sensitivity to surface compliance by tactile afferents in the human finger pad.

Authors:  Kathryn M Hudson; Melia Condon; Rochelle Ackerley; Francis McGlone; Håkan Olausson; Vaughan G Macefield; Ingvars Birznieks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Tactile perception of roughness: raised-dot spacing, density and disposition.

Authors:  Alexandra Dépeault; El-Mehdi Meftah; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Finger pad friction and its role in grip and touch.

Authors:  Michael J Adams; Simon A Johnson; Philippe Lefèvre; Vincent Lévesque; Vincent Hayward; Thibaut André; Jean-Louis Thonnard
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  The biology of skin wetness perception and its implications in manual function and for reproducing complex somatosensory signals in neuroprosthetics.

Authors:  Davide Filingeri; Rochelle Ackerley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Active and passive touch differentially activate somatosensory cortex in texture perception.

Authors:  Cristina Simões-Franklin; Teresa Aisling Whitaker; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  The arousing power of everyday materials: an analysis of the physiological and behavioral responses to visually and tactually presented textures.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  An fMRI study on cortical responses during active self-touch and passive touch from others.

Authors:  Rochelle Ackerley; Eusra Hassan; Andrew Curran; Johan Wessberg; Håkan Olausson; Francis McGlone
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Rasch-Built Measure of Pleasant Touch through Active Fingertip Exploration.

Authors:  Anne Klöcker; Carlyne Arnould; Massimo Penta; Jean-Louis Thonnard
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Effects of Increasing Stimulated Area in Spatiotemporally Congruent Unisensory and Multisensory Conditions.

Authors:  Chiara Martolini; Giulia Cappagli; Sabrina Signorini; Monica Gori
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.