Literature DB >> 20669167

Active and passive touch differentially activate somatosensory cortex in texture perception.

Cristina Simões-Franklin1, Teresa Aisling Whitaker, Fiona N Newell.   

Abstract

The neural mechanisms behind active and passive touch are not yet fully understood. Using fMRI we investigated the brain correlates of these exploratory procedures using a roughness categorization task. Participants either actively explored a surface (active touch) or the surface was moved under the participant's stationary finger (passive touch). The stimuli consisted of three different grades of sandpaper which participants were required to categorize as either coarse, medium, or fine. Exploratory procedure did not affect performance although the coarse and fine surfaces were more easily categorized than the medium surface. An initial whole brain analysis revealed activation of sensory and cognitive areas, including post-central gyrus and prefrontal cortical areas, in line with areas reported in previous studies. Our main analysis revealed greater activation during active than passive touch in the contralateral primary somatosensory region but no effect of stimulus roughness. In contrast, activation in the parietal operculum (OP) was significantly affected by stimulus roughness but not by exploration procedure. Active touch also elicited greater and more distributed brain activity compared with passive touch in areas outside the somatosensory region, possibly due to the motor component of the task. Our results reveal that different cortical areas may be involved in the processing of surface exploration and surface texture, with exploration procedures affecting activations in the primary somatosensory cortex and stimulus properties affecting relatively higher cortical areas within the somatosensory system.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20669167      PMCID: PMC6870332          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  74 in total

1.  fMRI of the responses to vibratory stimulation of digit tips.

Authors:  S T Francis; E F Kelly; R Bowtell; W J Dunseath; S E Folger; F McGlone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  The human parietal operculum. I. Cytoarchitectonic mapping of subdivisions.

Authors:  Simon B Eickhoff; Axel Schleicher; Karl Zilles; Katrin Amunts
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Selective visuo-haptic processing of shape and texture.

Authors:  Randall Stilla; K Sathian
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Effects of movement and movement imagery on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following posterior tibial nerve stimulation.

Authors:  R Kakigi; M Shimojo; M Hoshiyama; S Koyama; S Watanabe; D Naka; H Suzuki; A Nakamura
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1997-03

6.  Dissociation of the lateral and medial cerebellum in movement timing and movement execution.

Authors:  R B Ivry; S W Keele; H C Diener
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture: a multidimensional scaling analysis.

Authors:  M Hollins; R Faldowski; S Rao; F Young
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-12

Review 8.  Active versus passive touch: factors influencing the transmission of somatosensory signals to primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  C E Chapman
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.273

9.  Effects of selective attention on spatial form processing in monkey primary and secondary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  S S Hsiao; D M O'Shaughnessy; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Gating of somatosensory evoked potentials during different kinds of movement in man.

Authors:  D N Rushton; J C Rothwell; M D Craggs
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Tactual perception: a review of experimental variables and procedures.

Authors:  Alexandra M Fernandes; Pedro B Albuquerque
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-06-06

2.  Perceived loudness of self-generated sounds is differentially modified by expected sound intensity.

Authors:  Daniel Reznik; Yael Henkin; Osnat Levy; Roy Mukamel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Analysis of haptic information in the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  K Sathian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Virtual active touch using randomly patterned intracortical microstimulation.

Authors:  Joseph E O'Doherty; Mikhail A Lebedev; Zheng Li; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Do synaesthesia and mental imagery tap into similar cross-modal processes?

Authors:  Alan O'Dowd; Sarah M Cooney; David P McGovern; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Multimodal Interactions between Proprioceptive and Cutaneous Signals in Primary Somatosensory Cortex.

Authors:  Sung Soo Kim; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Pramodsingh H Thakur; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  An fMRI study on cortical responses during active self-touch and passive touch from others.

Authors:  Rochelle Ackerley; Eusra Hassan; Andrew Curran; Johan Wessberg; Håkan Olausson; Francis McGlone
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Decoding Accuracy in Supplementary Motor Cortex Correlates with Perceptual Sensitivity to Tactile Roughness.

Authors:  Junsuk Kim; Yoon Gi Chung; Jang-Yeon Park; Soon-Cheol Chung; Christian Wallraven; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Sung-Phil Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The role of insula-associated brain network in touch.

Authors:  Pengxu Wei; Ruixue Bao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Quantifying the sensory and emotional perception of touch: differences between glabrous and hairy skin.

Authors:  Rochelle Ackerley; Karin Saar; Francis McGlone; Helena Backlund Wasling
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.