Literature DB >> 26269550

Effects of changing skin mechanics on the differential sensitivity to surface compliance by tactile afferents in the human finger pad.

Kathryn M Hudson1, Melia Condon1, Rochelle Ackerley2, Francis McGlone3, Håkan Olausson2, Vaughan G Macefield4, Ingvars Birznieks5.   

Abstract

It is not known how changes in skin mechanics affect the responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the finger pads to compression forces. We used venous occlusion to change the stiffness of the fingers and investigated whether this influenced the firing of low-threshold mechanoreceptors to surfaces of differing stiffness. Unitary recordings were made from 10 slowly adapting type I (SAI), 10 fast adapting type I (FAI) and 9 slowly adapting type II (SAII) units via tungsten microelectrodes inserted into the median nerve at the wrist. A servo-controlled stimulator applied ramp-and-hold forces (1, 2, and 4 N) at a constant loading and unloading rate (2 N/s) via a flat 2.5-cm-diameter silicone disk over the center of the finger pad. Nine silicone disks (objects), varying in compliance, were used. Venous occlusion, produced by inflating a sphygmomanometer cuff around the upper arm to 40 ± 5 mmHg, was used to induce swelling of the fingers and increase the compliance of the finger pulp. Venous occlusion had no effect on the firing rates of the SAI afferents, nor on the slopes of the relationship between mean firing rate and object compliance at each amplitude, but did significantly reduce the slopes for the FAI afferents. Although the SAII afferents possess a poor capacity to encode changes in object compliance, mean firing rates were significantly lower during venous occlusion. The finding that venous occlusion had no effect on the firing properties of SAI afferents indicates that these afferents preserve their capacity to encode changes in object compliance, despite changes in skin mechanics.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  human; microneurography; sensory coding; skin mechanics; tactile afferents

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26269550      PMCID: PMC4600963          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00176.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  16 in total

1.  Subjective magnitude of tactile roughness.

Authors:  R T Verrillo; S J Bolanowski; F P McGlone
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.111

2.  Non-linear viscoelastic models predict fingertip pulp force-displacement characteristics during voluntary tapping.

Authors:  Devin L Jindrich; Yanhong Zhou; Theodore Becker; Jack Tigh Dennerlein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Cardiovascular and respiratory modulation of tactile afferents in the human finger pad.

Authors:  Vaughan G Macefield
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.969

4.  Differential sensitivity to surface compliance by tactile afferents in the human finger pad.

Authors:  Melia Condon; Ingvars Birznieks; Kathryn Hudson; David K Chelvanayagam; David Mahns; Håkan Olausson; Vaughan G Macefield
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin.

Authors:  R S Johansson; A B Vallbo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The structure and function of a slowly adapting touch corpuscle in hairy skin.

Authors:  A Iggo; A R Muir
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Factors affecting cutaneous mechanoreceptor response. I. Constant-force versus constant-displacement stimulation.

Authors:  B H Pubols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Factors affecting cutaneous mechanoreceptor response. II. Changes in mechanical properties of skin with repeated stimulation.

Authors:  B H Pubols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Friedrich Sigmund Merkel and his "Merkel cell", morphology, development, and physiology: review and new results.

Authors:  Zdenek Halata; Milos Grim; Klaus I Bauman
Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol       Date:  2003-03

10.  Does sympathetic nerve discharge affect the firing of myelinated cutaneous afferents in humans?

Authors:  Mikael Elam; Vaughan G Macefield
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 3.145

View more
  4 in total

1.  Contact mechanics of the human finger pad under compressive loads.

Authors:  Brygida M Dzidek; Michael J Adams; James W Andrews; Zhibing Zhang; Simon A Johnson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Computational modeling indicates that surface pressure can be reliably conveyed to tactile receptors even amidst changes in skin mechanics.

Authors:  Yuxiang Wang; Yoshichika Baba; Ellen A Lumpkin; Gregory J Gerling
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Individual Performance in Compliance Discrimination is Constrained by Skin Mechanics but Improved under Active Control.

Authors:  Chang Xu; Yuxiang Wang; Gregory J Gerling
Journal:  World Haptics Conf       Date:  2021-08-23

4.  Initial contact shapes the perception of friction.

Authors:  Laurence Willemet; Khoubeib Kanzari; Jocelyn Monnoyer; Ingvars Birznieks; Michaël Wiertlewski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.