Literature DB >> 10617263

More thoughts on perceiving and grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.

E G Otto-de Haart1, D P Carey, A B Milne.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that the insensitivity of the visuomotor system to various visual illusions is based on mechanisms in the so-called 'dorsal stream' of primate extrastriate cortex, which may depend upon binocular cues for their functions. The present study investigated the effects of binocular and monocular viewing on perception of and action to Müller-Lyer figures. Fourteen participants were required to match and grasp the shaft of a Müller-Lyer display under both viewing conditions. In the matching condition, participants were required to show the perceived extent of the central shaft of one of the two Müller-Lyer figures, using the extent of the gap between their finger and thumb. In the grasping task, participants were required to quickly and accurately reach out and grasp the central shaft of the specified Müller-Lyer figure. First, there was a striking effect of the illusion on the matching performance under both viewing conditions. However, the maximum grip aperture remained unaffected by the illusion figures. These results add to the theory of distinct modes of visual processing for perception and action. However, we did not find that grasping performance was affected by the illusion under monocular conditions. It is plausible that monocular depth cues distinct from those responsible for the illusion can successfully drive accurate grasping. Additional concerns regarding claims of action system resistance to the perceptual distortions of various illusions are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10617263     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00070-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  11 in total

1.  Dissociating perception and action in Kanizsa's compression illusion.

Authors:  Nicola Bruno; Paolo Bernardis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception?

Authors:  V H Franz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: not a change in perceived length.

Authors:  Marianne Biegstraaten; Denise D J de Grave; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  "Graspability" of objects affects gaze patterns during perception and action tasks.

Authors:  Loni Desanghere; J J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Binocular Viewing Facilitates Size Constancy for Grasping and Manual Estimation.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; Michael Cao; Michael Barnett-Cowan
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20

6.  Is simple reaction time affected by visual illusions?

Authors:  Irene Sperandio; Silvia Savazzi; Carlo A Marzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Grasping at sticks: pseudoneglect for perception but not action.

Authors:  Laura E Hughes; Tim C Bates; Anne Aimola Davies
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The Müller-Lyer illusion affects the planning and control of manual aiming movements.

Authors:  Daniel V Meegan; Cheryl M Glazebrook; Victoria P Dhillon; Luc Tremblay; Timothy N Welsh; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Positive-Negative Asymmetry in the Evaluations of Political Candidates. The Role of Features of Similarity and Affect in Voter Behavior.

Authors:  Andrzej Falkowski; Magdalena Jabłońska
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-27

10.  Does my step look big in this? A visual illusion leads to safer stepping behaviour.

Authors:  David B Elliott; Anna Vale; David Whitaker; John G Buckley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.