Literature DB >> 15221169

Grasping at sticks: pseudoneglect for perception but not action.

Laura E Hughes1, Tim C Bates, Anne Aimola Davies.   

Abstract

A current question in theories of visual cognition is whether distinct cognitive processes subserve perceptual judgments and perception for action. This paper examines bisection tasks which have previously been used to demonstrate a dissociation between perception and action in brain injured patients. Forty neurologically intact participants completed a standard line bisection task and a variant of this task--rod bisection. A typical leftwards bias was observed for line bisection but when asked to locate the centre of wooden rods using perceptual judgments, a distinct rightwards bias was shown. By contrast, when participants were asked to pick the rods up by the centre, their judgments showed no bias. The results are in line with theories suggesting that perception and action are independent; however, alternative explanations are also considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15221169     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1958-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

1.  The Judd illusion: evidence for two visual streams or two experimental conditions?

Authors:  M Mon-Williams; R Bull
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Pointing and grasping in unilateral visual neglect: effect of on-line visual feedback in grasping.

Authors:  M G Edwards; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Sex differences in line bisection as a function of hand.

Authors:  Markus Hausmann; Gökce Ergun; Yanki Yazgan; Onur Güntürkün
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees?

Authors:  G R Fink; P W Halligan; J C Marshall; C D Frith; R S Frackowiak; R J Dolan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Is left always right? Directional deviations in visual line bisection as a function of hand and initial scanning direction.

Authors:  E E Brodie; L E Pettigrew
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Is there dissociation of perceptual and motor responses to figural illusions?

Authors:  R B Post; R B Welch
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Spatial field advantages for tactile line bisection as a function of hemispheric specialisation inferred from dichotic listening.

Authors:  E E Brodie; L E Pettigrew
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 9.  Neglect of awareness.

Authors:  P W Halligan; J C Marshall
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1998-09

10.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension.

Authors:  M A Goodale; J P Meenan; H H Bülthoff; D A Nicolle; K J Murphy; C I Racicot
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  1 in total

1.  The reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependent.

Authors:  A G Mitchell; J M Harris; S E Benstock; J M Ales
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.139

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.