Literature DB >> 10615468

Effect of field size, head motion, and rotational velocity on roll vection and illusory self-tilt in a tumbling room.

R S Allison1, I P Howard, J E Zacher.   

Abstract

The effect of field size, velocity, and visual fixation upon the perception of self-body rotation and tilt was examined in a rotating furnished room. Subjects sat in a stationary chair in the furnished room which could be rotated about the body roll axis. For full-field conditions, complete 360 degrees body rotation (tumbling) was the most common sensation (felt by 80% of subjects). Constant tilt or partial tumbling (less than 360 degrees rotation) occurred more frequently with a small field of view (20 deg). The number of subjects who experienced complete tumbling increased with increases in field of view and room velocity (for velocities between 15 and 30 degrees s-1). The speed of perceived self-rotation relative to room rotation also increased with increasing field of view.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Neuroscience; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10615468     DOI: 10.1068/p2891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  17 in total

1.  Perceiving a stable world during active rotational and translational head movements.

Authors:  P M Jaekl; M R Jenkin; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Exposure to a rotating virtual environment during treadmill locomotion causes adaptation in heading direction.

Authors:  A P Mulavara; J T Richards; T Ruttley; A Marshburn; Y Nomura; J J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Material surface properties modulate vection strength.

Authors:  Yuki Morimoto; Hirotaro Sato; Chihiro Hiramatsu; Takeharu Seno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Perception of smooth and perturbed vection in short-duration microgravity.

Authors:  Robert S Allison; James E Zacher; Ramy Kirollos; Pearl S Guterman; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effects of local rotation on roll vection induced by globally rotating visual inducer.

Authors:  Shinji Nakamura
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-27

6.  Comparing the effectiveness of different displays in enhancing illusions of self-movement (vection).

Authors:  Bernhard E Riecke; Jacqueline D Jordan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 7.  Future challenges for vection research: definitions, functional significance, measures, and neural bases.

Authors:  Stephen Palmisano; Robert S Allison; Mark M Schira; Robert J Barry
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-27

8.  The Oscillating Potential Model of Visually Induced Vection.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Ken-Ichi Sawai; Hidetoshi Kanaya; Toshihiro Wakebe; Masaki Ogawa; Yoshitaka Fujii; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-24

9.  Visual rotation axis and body position relative to the gravitational direction: Effects on circular vection.

Authors:  Shigehito Tanahashi; Hiroyasu Ujike; Kazuhiko Ukai
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-12-04

10.  Framing visual roll-motion affects postural sway and the subjective visual vertical.

Authors:  Astrid J A Lubeck; Jelte E Bos; John F Stins
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.