Literature DB >> 23111427

Perception of smooth and perturbed vection in short-duration microgravity.

Robert S Allison1, James E Zacher, Ramy Kirollos, Pearl S Guterman, Stephen Palmisano.   

Abstract

Successful adaptation to the microgravity environment of space and readaptation to gravity on earth requires recalibration of visual and vestibular signals. Recently, we have shown that adding simulated viewpoint oscillation to visual self-motion displays produces more compelling vection (despite the expected increase in visual-vestibular conflict experienced by stationary observers). Currently, it is unclear what role adaptation to gravity might play in this oscillation-based vection advantage. The vection elicited by optic flow displays simulating either smooth forward motion or forward motion perturbed by viewpoint oscillation was assessed before, during and after microgravity exposure in parabolic flight. During normal 1-g conditions subjects experienced significantly stronger vection for oscillating compared to smooth radial optic flow. The magnitude of this oscillation enhancement was reduced during short-term microgravity exposure, more so for simulated interaural (as opposed to spinal) axis viewpoint oscillation. We also noted a small overall reduction in vection sensitivity post-flight. A supplementary experiment found that 1-g vection responses did not vary significantly across multiple testing sessions. These findings: (i) demonstrate that the oscillation advantage for vection is very stable and repeatable during 1-g conditions and (ii) imply that adaptation or conditioned responses played a role in the post-flight vection reductions. The effects observed in microgravity are discussed in terms of the ecology of terrestrial locomotion and the nature of movement in microgravity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23111427     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3275-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  37 in total

1.  Wayfinding on foot from information in retinal, not optical, flow.

Authors:  J E Cutting; K Springer; P A Braren; S H Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1992-03

Review 2.  Context-specific adaptation and its significance for neurovestibular problems of space flight.

Authors:  Mark Shelhamer; David S Zee
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Natural visual-field features enhance vection.

Authors:  Andrea Bubka; Frederick Bonato
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Velocity discrimination thresholds for flowfield motions with moving observers.

Authors:  Michael W von Grünau; Kamala Pilgrim; Rong Zhou
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Possible methods of producing the gravity-free state for medical research.

Authors:  F HABER; H HABER
Journal:  J Aviat Med       Date:  1950-10

Review 6.  Sensory conflict theory and space sickness: our changing perspective.

Authors:  C M Oman
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Microgravity enhances the relative contribution of visually-induced motion sensation.

Authors:  L R Young; M Shelhamer
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1990-06

8.  Performance of the human vestibuloocular reflex during locomotion.

Authors:  G E Grossman; R J Leigh; E N Bruce; W P Huebner; D J Lanska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Motion habituation: inverted self-motion perception and optokinetic after-nystagmus.

Authors:  T Brandt; J Dichgans; W Büchle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Space and the vestibular system: what has been learned?

Authors:  L R Young
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.435

View more
  4 in total

1.  Walking without optic flow reduces subsequent vection.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Stephen Palmisano; Bernhard E Riecke; Shinji Nakamura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The Oscillating Potential Model of Visually Induced Vection.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Ken-Ichi Sawai; Hidetoshi Kanaya; Toshihiro Wakebe; Masaki Ogawa; Yoshitaka Fujii; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-24

3.  The search for instantaneous vection: An oscillating visual prime reduces vection onset latency.

Authors:  Stephen Palmisano; Bernhard E Riecke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The effect of water immersion on vection in virtual reality.

Authors:  Géraldine Fauville; Anna C M Queiroz; Erika S Woolsey; Jonathan W Kelly; Jeremy N Bailenson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.