Literature DB >> 10612920

Bone reactions to anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) used in sinus augmentation procedures: a histologic long-term report of 20 cases in humans.

M Piattelli1, G A Favero, A Scarano, G Orsini, A Piattelli.   

Abstract

Many materials are used for sinus augmentation procedures. Anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) has been reported to be osteoconductive, and no inflammatory responses have been observed with the use of this biomaterial. One of the main questions pertaining to Bio-Oss concerns its biodegradation and substitution by host bone. Some investigators have observed rapid replacement by host bone, while other researchers observed slow resorptive activity or no resorption at all. The aim of the present study was to conduct a long-term histologic analysis of retrieved specimens in humans where Bio-Oss was used in sinus augmentation procedures. Specimens were retrieved from 20 patients after varying periods from 6 months to 4 years and were processed to obtain thin ground sections. Bio-Oss particles were surrounded for the most part by mature, compact bone. In some Haversian canals it was possible to observe small capillaries, mesenchymal cells, and osteoblasts in conjunction with new bone. No gaps were present at the interface between the Bio-Oss particles and newly formed bone. In specimens retrieved after 18 months and 4 years, it was also possible to observe the presence of osteoclasts in the process of resorbing the Bio-Oss particles and neighboring newly formed bone. Bio-Oss appears to be highly biocompatible and osteoconductive, is slowly resorbed in humans, and can be used with success as a bone substitute in maxillary sinus augmentation procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10612920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  59 in total

1.  Comparing variable-length polyglutamate domains to anchor an osteoinductive collagen-mimetic peptide to diverse bone grafting materials.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bain; Bonnie K Culpepper; Michael S Reddy; Susan L Bellis
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Bio-Oss®acts on Stem cells derived from Peripheral Blood.

Authors:  Vincenzo Sollazzo; Annalisa Palmieri; Luca Scapoli; Marcella Martinelli; Ambra Girardi; Francesco Alviano; Agnese Pellati; Vittoria Perrotti; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2010-01

3.  Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Autologous and Heterologous Bone Graft: A Clinical and Radiographic Report of Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement.

Authors:  Mario Santagata; Umberto Tozzi; Gianpaolo Tartaro; Vincenzo Santillo; Corrado Giovanni; Ettore Lamart; Angelo Itro; Giuseppe Colella; Salvatore D'Amato
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-08-30

4.  Effect of low-level laser therapy irradiation and Bio-Oss graft material on the osteogenesis process in rabbit calvarium defects: a double blind experimental study.

Authors:  Amir Alireza Rasouli Ghahroudi; Amir Reza Rokn; Katayoun A M Kalhori; Afshin Khorsand; Alireza Pournabi; A L B Pinheiro; Reza Fekrazad
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Histologic and histomorphometric results of three bone graft substitutes after sinus augmentation in humans.

Authors:  Marzia Pettinicchio; Tonino Traini; Giovanna Murmura; Sergio Caputi; Marco Degidi; Carlo Mangano; Adriano Piattelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Comparison of Material-mediated Bone Regeneration Capacities of Sintered and Non-sintered Xenogeneic Bone Substitutes via 2D and 3D Data.

Authors:  Eleni Kapogianni; Mike Barbeck; Tim Fienitz; Daniel Rothamel; Ole Jung; Aylin Arslan; Lennart Kuhnel; Xin Xiong; Rumen Krastev; Reinhard E. Friedrich; Reinhard Schnettler
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Search for ideal biomaterials to cultivate human osteoblast-like cells for reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  M Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad; R Gutwald; N-C Gellrich; U Hübner; R Schmelzeisen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Multidetector CT Dentascan evaluation of bone regeneration obtained with deproteinised bovine graft in residual cavity after mandibular cyst enucleation.

Authors:  S Pappalardo; M Coronella; M L Lanza; V Rabbito; P V Foti; L A Mauro; S Palmucci; G C Ettorre
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Comparative, Histological and Histomorphometric Analysis of Three Anorganic Bovine Xenogenous Bone Substitutes: Bio-Oss, Bone-Fill and Gen-Ox Anorganic.

Authors:  Rafael Manfro; Fabiano Silva Fonseca; Marcelo Carlos Bortoluzzi; Wilson Roberto Sendyk
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-08-02

10.  Surface- and nonsurface-dependent in vitro effects of bone substitutes on cell viability.

Authors:  M Herten; D Rothamel; F Schwarz; K Friesen; G Koegler; J Becker
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.