Literature DB >> 10594510

Vocal cord paralysis after subtotal oesophagectomy.

J B Hulscher1, J W van Sandick, P P Devriese, J J van Lanschot, H Obertop.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although vocal cord paralysis is a well known complication of subtotal oesophagectomy, precise data concerning origin, incidence and associated morbidity are lacking.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of 241 patients who underwent transhiatal oesophagectomy for carcinoma of the mid/distal oesophagus between 1994 and 1998. Preoperative and postoperative laryngoscopy results were available for 140 patients.
RESULTS: There were 109 men and 31 women, of mean age 63 years. Thirty-one patients (22 per cent) with recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis were identified, three with bilateral and 28 with unilateral dysfunction. Paralysis occurred ipsilateral to the side of the cervical incision in 22 of 28 patients. It was permanent in six patients. The associated morbidity was substantial: pulmonary complications were more common in patients with vocal cord paralysis (12 of 31 versus 26 (24 per cent) of 109), leading to significantly more reintubations, and a significantly prolonged ventilation time and stay in the intensive care unit.
CONCLUSION: Although mostly transient, vocal cord paralysis is a frequent complication with significant associated morbidity. In an extended transthoracic resection (including a lymphadenectomy in the aortopulmonary window where the left recurrent laryngeal nerve is at risk) the cervical anastomosis should be made on the left side, to minimize the risk of bilateral vocal cord paralysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10594510     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01333.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  34 in total

1.  [Chronic diseases after gastrointestinal surgery].

Authors:  I Zuber-Jerger; J Schölmerich; F Klebl
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Surgical treatment of superficial esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuo Tachibana; Shoichi Kinugasa; Muneaki Shibakita; Yasuhito Tonomoto; Shinji Hattori; Ryoji Hyakudomi; Hiroshi Yoshimura; Dipok Kumar Dhar; Naofumi Nagasue
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-07-08       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  High risk of unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after esophagectomy using cervical anastomosis.

Authors:  L Pertl; J Zacherl; G Mancusi; J N Gächter; R Asari; S Schoppmann; W Bigenzahn; B Schneider-Stickler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma: experience from a single tertiary care institution.

Authors:  Nadeem UlNazeer Kawoosa; Abdul Majeed Dar; Mukand Lal Sharma; Abdul Gani Ahangar; Ghulam Nabi Lone; Mohammad Akbar Bhat; Shyam Singh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Community-acquired pneumonia during long-term follow-up of patients after radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: analysis of incidence and associated risk factors.

Authors:  Takaaki Hanyu; Tatsuo Kanda; Kazuhito Yajima; Yoshinari Tanabe; Shintaro Komukai; Shin-Ichi Kosugi; Tsutomu Suzuki; Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Clinical predictors of aspiration after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Seung Yeol Lee; Hee-Jung Cheon; Sang Jun Kim; Young Mog Shim; Jae Ill Zo; Ji Hye Hwang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Short-term outcomes and one surgeon's learning curve for thoracoscopic esophagectomy performed with the patient in the prone position.

Authors:  Taro Oshikiri; Takashi Yasuda; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Masashi Yamamoto; Shingo Kanaji; Kimihiro Yamashita; Takeru Matsuda; Yasuo Sumi; Tetsu Nakamura; Yasuhiro Fujino; Masahiro Tominaga; Satoshi Suzuki; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Lymph Node Evaluation in Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Yin-Kai Chao; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Yun-Hen Liu; Hui-Ping Liu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Comparison of short-term outcomes between prone and lateral decubitus positions for thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Jin Teshima; Go Miyata; Takashi Kamei; Toru Nakano; Shigeo Abe; Kazunori Katsura; Yusuke Taniyama; Tadashi Sakurai; Makoto Hikage; Takanobu Nakamura; Kai Takaya; Masashi Zuguchi; Hiroshi Okamoto; Ozawa Youhei; Noriaki Ohuchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy: lessons learned.

Authors:  Grant Sanders; Frederic Borie; Emanuel Husson; Pierre Marie Blanc; Gianluca Di Mauro; Christiano Claus; Bertrand Millat
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.