Literature DB >> 21384241

Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma: experience from a single tertiary care institution.

Nadeem UlNazeer Kawoosa1, Abdul Majeed Dar, Mukand Lal Sharma, Abdul Gani Ahangar, Ghulam Nabi Lone, Mohammad Akbar Bhat, Shyam Singh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lot of controversy about the best surgical treatment for esophageal carcinoma.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, 382 patients with carcinoma of the mid-to-distal esophagus underwent transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy. Early morbidity and mortality were compared. Principal endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: A total of 177 patients underwent transthoracic esophagectomy, and 205 patients underwent transhiatal esophagectomy. Demographic characteristics and characteristics of the tumor were similar in the two groups. Perioperative and postoperative morbidity was higher after transhiatal esophagectomy. In-hospital mortality was also higher after transhiatal esophagectomy. The median follow-up was 4.3 years. Estimated 3-year DFS rates were 44.63 and 31.21%, whereas the 3-year OS rates were 57.06 and 41.46% for the transthoracic and transhiatal groups, respectively (statistically significant). Also, the estimated 5-year DFS rates were 26.55 and 21.46%, whereas the 5-year OS rates were 32.76 and 30.24% for the transthoracic and transhiatal groups, respectively (statistically not significant).
CONCLUSIONS: Transhiatal esophagectomy was associated with higher perioperative and postoperative morbidity and in-hospital mortality than transthoracic esophagectomy. The DFS and OS were higher in the transthoracic group and were statistically significant at 3 years but statistically insignificant at 5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21384241     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1020-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  30 in total

1.  A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  K M Chu; S Y Law; M Fok; J Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Effect of surgical experience on results of esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  J D Miller; M K Jain; C J de Gara; D Morgan; J D Urschel
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J B Hulscher; J G Tijssen; H Obertop; J J van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  N T Nguyen; D M Follette; B M Wolfe; P D Schneider; P Roberts; J E Goodnight
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-08

Review 5.  Transhiatal versus Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy: is there a difference?

Authors:  R Rindani; C J Martin; M R Cox
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1999-03

6.  Catastrophic complications of the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis.

Authors:  M D Iannettoni; R I Whyte; M B Orringer
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Transthoracic esophagectomy: a safe approach to carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  D J Mathisen; H C Grillo; E W Wilkins; A C Moncure; A D Hilgenberg
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Esophagogastrectomy. A safe, widely applicable, and expeditious form of palliation for patients with carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia.

Authors:  F H Ellis; S P Gibb; E Watkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Transhiatal esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease.

Authors:  M B Orringer; B Marshall; M C Stirling
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Changes in the surgical management of esophageal cancer from 1970 to 1993.

Authors:  S G Swisher; K K Hunt; E C Holmes; M J Zinner; D W McFadden
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  6 in total

1.  Outcomes after transhiatal esophagectomies in an eastern-European low-volume center.

Authors:  Radu Neagoe; Septimu Voidazan; Mihaly Szocs; Daniela Tatiana Sala; Serban Bancu; Gheorghe Mulhfay
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.021

2.  Transhiatal vs. Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A NSQIP Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes and Risk Factors for Morbidity.

Authors:  Francisco Schlottmann; Paula D Strassle; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Transthoracic vs transhiatal surgery for cancer of the esophagogastric junction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ming-Tian Wei; Yuan-Chuan Zhang; Xiang-Bing Deng; Ting-Han Yang; Ya-Zhou He; Zi-Qiang Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Outcome-volume relationships and transhiatal esophagectomy: minimizing "failure to rescue".

Authors:  Renee L Arlow; Dirk F Moore; Chunxia Chen; John Langenfeld; David A August
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2014-12-19

5.  Endoscope-assisted mediastinal drainage therapy for anastomosis leakage after esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Lianggang Zhu; Yuquan Wu; Su Yang; Hailei Du; Xiang Zhou; Jiaming Che; Junbiao Hang; Hecheng Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

6.  T-drain esophagostomy under thoracoscopy for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy for esophagogastric junction cancer: A case report.

Authors:  Toshikatsu Tsuji; Hiroshi Saito; Kengo Hayashi; Shinichi Kadoya; Hiroyuki Bando
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-06-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.