Literature DB >> 28801820

Lymph Node Evaluation in Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Yin-Kai Chao1, Ming-Ju Hsieh2, Yun-Hen Liu2, Hui-Ping Liu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Radical lymph node dissection (LND) along the bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is a surgically challenging procedure with a high rate of morbidity. Here, we assessed in a retrospective manner the adequacy of LND along the RLN performed with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (RATE) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (VATE) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, propensity-matched study. ESCC patients who underwent McKeown esophagectomy and bilateral RLN LND with a minimally invasive approach were divided into two groups according to the use of robot-assisted surgery or not (RATE vs VATE, respectively). Using propensity score matching, 34 balanced matched pairs were identified. The number of dissected nodes as well as the rates of RLN palsy and perioperative complications served as the main outcome measures.
RESULTS: No conversion to open thoracotomy occurred in either group. Intraoperative blood loss and the need of blood transfusions did not show significant intergroup differences. The mean number of dissected nodes was similar in the two study groups, the only exception being the left RLN area. Specifically, the mean number of nodes removed from this region was 5.32 in the RATE group and 3.38 in patients who received VATE (p = 0.007). Notably, the RATE and VATE groups did not differ significantly with regard to rates of both RLN palsy (20.6 vs 29.4%, respectively, p = 0.401) and pulmonary complications (5.9 vs 17.6%, respectively, p = 0.259).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with VATE, RATE resulted in a higher lymph node yield along the left RLN without increasing morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28801820     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4179-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  21 in total

1.  A novel method for lymphadenectomy along the left laryngeal recurrent nerve during thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yong Xi; Zhenkai Ma; Yaxing Shen; Hao Wang; Mingxiang Feng; Lijie Tan; Qun Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Paralysis After Esophagectomy for Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yu Sato; Shin-ichi Kosugi; Naotaka Aizawa; Takashi Ishikawa; Yosuke Kano; Hiroshi Ichikawa; Takaaki Hanyu; Kotaro Hirashima; Takeo Bamba; Toshifumi Wakai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position: technical report and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Koichi Suda; Yoshinori Ishida; Yuichiro Kawamura; Kazuki Inaba; Seiichiro Kanaya; Satoshi Teramukai; Seiji Satoh; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  A comprehensive evaluation for aspiration after esophagectomy reduces the incidence of postoperative pneumonia.

Authors:  Mark F Berry; B Zane Atkins; Betty C Tong; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark W Onaitis
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hirokazu Noshiro; Hironori Iwasaki; Kiitiro Kobayashi; Akihiko Uchiyama; Yoshihiro Miyasaka; Toshihiro Masatsugu; Kenta Koike; Kouji Miyazaki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Optimal lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus: comparing the short- and long-term outcome among the four types of lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Hiromasa Fujita; Susumu Sueyoshi; Toshiaki Tanaka; Teruhiko Fujii; Uhi Toh; Takashi Mine; Hiroko Sasahara; Tomoya Sudo; Satoru Matono; Hideaki Yamana; Kazuo Shirouzu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-04-28       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Robotic Esophagectomy for Cancer: Early Results and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Robert J Cerfolio; Benjamin Wei; Mary T Hawn; Douglas J Minnich
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-10-30

9.  Superiority of Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy in Reducing In-Hospital Mortality of Patients with Resectable Oesophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Can Zhou; Li Zhang; Hua Wang; Xiaoxia Ma; Bohui Shi; Wuke Chen; Jianjun He; Ke Wang; Peijun Liu; Yu Ren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Oncologic Long-Term Results of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Thoraco-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy with Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  P C van der Sluis; J P Ruurda; R J J Verhage; S van der Horst; L Haverkamp; P D Siersema; I H M Borel Rinkes; F J W Ten Kate; R van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Robot-Assisted Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation-Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Ashish Goel; Vikash Nayak
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-25

2.  Prevention of intra-thoracic recurrent laryngeal nerve injury with robot-assisted esophagectomy.

Authors:  Kei Hosoda; Masahiro Niihara; Hideki Ushiku; Hiroki Harada; Mikiko Sakuraya; Marie Washio; Keishi Yamashita; Naoki Hiki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Meta-analysis of robot-assisted versus video-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Dimitrios E Magouliotis; Prokopis-Andreas Zotos; Maria P Fergadi; Despoina Koukousaki; Dimitris Zacharoulis; Alexandros Diamantis; Kyriakos Spiliopoulos; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-08-06

4.  Perioperative Outcomes and Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted McKeown Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hai-Bo Sun; Duo Jiang; Xian-Ben Liu; Wen-Qun Xing; Shi-Lei Liu; Pei-Nan Chen; Peng Li; Ya-Xing Ma
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Extended thoracic lymph node dissection in robotic-assisted minimal invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for patients with superior mediastinal lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Sylvia van der Horst; Michiel F G de Maat; Pieter C van der Sluis; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-03

6.  Outcomes after total robotic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched comparison with hybrid robotic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Kwon Joong Na; Samina Park; In Kyu Park; Young Tae Kim; Chang Hyun Kang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.

Authors:  Haiqi He; Qifei Wu; Zhe Wang; Yong Zhang; Nanzheng Chen; Junke Fu; Guangjian Zhang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Comparisons of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted and thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with extended two-field lymph node dissection for resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Junying Chen; Qianwen Liu; Xu Zhang; Hong Yang; Zihui Tan; Yaobin Lin; Jianhua Fu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Outcomes of Esophageal Cancer after Esophagectomy in the Era of Early Injection Laryngoplasty.

Authors:  Tuan-Jen Fang; Yu-Cheng Pei; Yi-An Lu; Hsiu-Feng Chung; Hui-Chen Chiang; Hsueh-Yu Li; Alice M K Wong
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20

10.  Adequate Lymphadenectomy as a Quality Measure in Esophageal Cancer: Is there an Association with Treatment Approach?

Authors:  Cary Jo R Schlick; Rhami Khorfan; David D Odell; Ryan P Merkow; David J Bentrem
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 4.339

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.