Literature DB >> 27400692

Short-term outcomes and one surgeon's learning curve for thoracoscopic esophagectomy performed with the patient in the prone position.

Taro Oshikiri1,2, Takashi Yasuda3, Hiroshi Hasegawa4, Masashi Yamamoto4, Shingo Kanaji4, Kimihiro Yamashita4, Takeru Matsuda4, Yasuo Sumi4, Tetsu Nakamura4, Yasuhiro Fujino3, Masahiro Tominaga3, Satoshi Suzuki4, Yoshihiro Kakeji4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Thoracoscopic esophagectomy with the patient in the prone position (TEP) is now being performed as minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. This study examines the short-term outcomes and the learning curve associated with TEP.
METHODS: One surgeon ("Surgeon A") performed TEP on 100 consecutive patients assigned to three periods based on treatment order. Each group consisted of 33 or 34 patients. The outcomes of the three groups were compared to define the influence of surgeon expertise.
RESULTS: Outcomes improved as Surgeon A gained experience in performing this operation, as evidenced by reduced thoracic operative times between periods 1 and 2, and then between periods 2 and 3 (p = 0.0033 and p = 0.0326, respectively); an increased number of retrieved chest nodes between periods 1 and 2 (p = 0.0070); and a decline in recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy between periods 2 and 3 (p = 0.0450). Period 2 was the pivotal period for each learning curve.
CONCLUSIONS: An individual surgeon's learning curve over the course of 100 TEP procedures had three outcomes: a shortened operative time, a higher number of retrieved chest nodes, and a decreased rate of RLN palsy. Approximately 30-60 cases were needed to reach a plateau in the TEP procedure and a reduction in the morbidity rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Learning curve; Short-term outcome; Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27400692     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-016-1378-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  25 in total

1.  Significance of extended systemic lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal carcinoma in Japan.

Authors:  H Watanabe; H Kato; Y Tachimori
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2000

2.  Effect of surgical experience on results of esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  J D Miller; M K Jain; C J de Gara; D Morgan; J D Urschel
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Operable esophageal cancer: current results from the West.

Authors:  A Watson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Esophageal malignancy: a growing concern.

Authors:  Jianyuan Chai; M Mazen Jamal
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Thoracolaparoscopy in the lateral position for esophageal cancer: the experience of a single institution with 112 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Shailesh P Puntambekar; Geetanjali A Agarwal; Saurabh N Joshi; Neeraj V Rayate; Ravindra M Sathe; Anjali M Patil
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Lymph node metastasis along the recurrent nerve chain is an indication for cervical lymph node dissection in thoracic esophageal cancer.

Authors:  H Shiozaki; M Yano; T Tsujinaka; M Inoue; S Tamura; Y Doki; T Yasuda; Y Fujiwara; M Monden
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.429

8.  Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hirokazu Noshiro; Hironori Iwasaki; Kiitiro Kobayashi; Akihiko Uchiyama; Yoshihiro Miyasaka; Toshihiro Masatsugu; Kenta Koike; Kouji Miyazaki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus.

Authors:  H Akiyama; M Tsurumaru; H Udagawa; Y Kajiyama
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation.

Authors:  H Osugi; M Takemura; M Higashino; N Takada; S Lee; H Kinoshita
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  10 in total

1.  The superior approach with the stomach roll-up technique improves intraoperative outcomes and facilitates learning laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study between the superior and inferior approach.

Authors:  Takanori Morikawa; Masaharu Ishida; Tatsuyuki Takadate; Tatsuo Hata; Masahiro Iseki; Kei Kawaguchi; Hideo Ohtsuka; Masamichi Mizuma; Hiroki Hayashi; Kei Nakagawa; Fuyuhiko Motoi; Takashi Kamei; Takeshi Naitoh; Michiaki Unno
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Standardizing procedures improves and homogenizes short-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Taro Oshikiri; Tetsu Nakamura; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Masashi Yamamoto; Shingo Kanaji; Kimihiro Yamashita; Takeru Matsuda; Yasuo Sumi; Yasuhiro Fujino; Masahiro Tominaga; Satoshi Suzuki; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Minimally invasive surgical management of spontaneous esophageal perforation (Boerhaave's syndrome).

Authors:  Jessie A Elliott; Louise Buckley; Mohamed Albagir; Antonios Athanasiou; Thomas J Murphy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Clinical analysis of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in a single center by a single medical group.

Authors:  Zi-Yi Zhu; Xu Yong; Rao-Jun Luo; Yun-Zhen Wang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018 Sept.       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Safety and feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yushi Fujiwara; Shigeru Lee; Satoru Kishida; Ryoya Hashiba; Ken Gyobu; Masashi Takemura; Harushi Osugi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Robot assisted esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaobin Zhang; Yuchen Su; Yu Yang; Yifeng Sun; Bo Ye; Xufeng Guo; Teng Mao; Rong Hua; Zhigang Li
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Value of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor for long-term survival in postoperative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Guang-Wen Xu; Han-Ran Wu; Ran Xiong; Cai-Wei Li; Chang-Qing Liu; Mei-Qing Xu; Ming-Ran Xie
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  From McKeown to Ivor Lewis, the learning curve for thoracic lymphadenectomy over the first 100 robotic esophagectomy cases: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ze-Guo Zhuo; Gang Li; Tie-Niu Song; Gu-Ha Alai; Xu Shen; Yun Wang; Yi-Dan Lin
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the lateral-prone position: Experience of 124 cases in a single center.

Authors:  Shaohua Ma; Tianshen Yan; Dandan Liu; Keyi Wang; Jingdi Wang; Jintao Song; Tong Wang; Wei He; Jie Bai; Liang Jin
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Learning curve associated with thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients in the prone position.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Mu-Yuan Ma; Bo Wu; Yang Zhao; Xiao-Feng Ye; Tao Li
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 1.637

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.