Literature DB >> 19132535

Persons and their parts: new reproductive technologies and risks of commodification.

Heather Widdows1.   

Abstract

This paper explores one aspect of the social implications of new reproductive technologies, namely, the impact such technologies have on our understandings of family structures and our expectations of children. In particular it considers whether the possibilities afforded by such technologies result in a more contractual and commodified understanding of children. To do this the paper outlines the possibilities afforded by NRTs and their commodificatory tendencies; second, it explores the commodification debate using the somewhat parallel example of commodification of organs; and third, in light of these debates the link between the commodification of body parts and persons is addressed. It will argue that there is a prime facie connection between body parts and persons and thus, although needing to be balanced with other ethically relevant factors, commodification remains an issue of ethical concern. Accordingly we should only be supporting potentially commodifying practices when there are ethically pressing reasons to do so (such as in organ transplantation). Moreover given this link between body part and persons we should attempt to lessen commodifying attitudes and thus should resist the increasing use of practices which regard children as having choose-able parts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19132535     DOI: 10.1007/s10728-008-0107-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  13 in total

1.  Biotechnology and monstrosity. Why we should pay attention to the "yuk factor".

Authors:  M Midgley
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Can sex selection be ethically tolerated?

Authors:  B M Dickens
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Sex selection: the case for.

Authors:  J Savulescu
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1999-10-04       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  Is the sale of body parts wrong?

Authors:  J Savulescu
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 5.  The commodification of human reproductive materials.

Authors:  D B Resnik
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Should selecting saviour siblings be banned?

Authors:  S Sheldon; S Wilkinson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  The best possible child.

Authors:  Michael Parker
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 8.  Perinatal outcome and developmental studies on children born after IVF.

Authors:  F Olivennes; R Fanchin; N Lédée; C Righini; I J Kadoch; R Frydman
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  There is a difference between selecting a deaf embryo and deafening a hearing child.

Authors:  M Häyry
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Are attempts to have impaired children justifiable?

Authors:  K W Anstey
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.