Literature DB >> 10575312

Artificial neural networks applied to survival prediction in breast cancer.

M Lundin1, J Lundin, H B Burke, S Toikkanen, L Pylkkänen, H Joensuu.   

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of a neural network in predicting 5-, 10- and 15-year breast-cancer-specific survival. A series of 951 breast cancer patients was divided into a training set of 651 and a validation set of 300 patients. Eight variables were entered as input to the network: tumor size, axillary nodal status, histological type, mitotic count, nuclear pleomorphism, tubule formation, tumor necrosis and age. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used as a measure of accuracy of the prediction models in generating survival estimates for the patients in the independent validation set. The AUC values of the neural network models for 5-, 10- and 15-year breast-cancer-specific survival were 0.909, 0.886 and 0.883, respectively. The corresponding AUC values for logistic regression were 0.897, 0.862 and 0.858. Axillary lymph node status (N0 vs. N+) predicted 5-year survival with a specificity of 71% and a sensitivity of 77%. The sensitivity of the neural network model was 91% at this specificity level. The rate of false predictions at 5 years was 82/300 for nodal status and 40/300 for the neural network. When nodal status was excluded from the neural network model, the rate of false predictions increased only to 49/300 (AUC 0. 877). An artificial neural network is very accurate in the 5-, 10- and 15-year breast-cancer-specific survival prediction. The consistently high accuracy over time and the good predictive performance of a network trained without information on nodal status demonstrate that neural networks can be important tools for cancer survival prediction. Copyright 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10575312     DOI: 10.1159/000012061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  19 in total

Review 1.  Artificial neural networks for predictive modeling in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eduard J Gamito; E David Crawford
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  An artificial neural network improves prediction of observed survival in patients with laryngeal squamous carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrew S Jones; Azzam G F Taktak; Timothy R Helliwell; John E Fenton; Martin A Birchall; David J Husband; Anthony C Fisher
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  A novel prognostic two-gene signature for triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Mansour A Alsaleem; Graham Ball; Michael S Toss; Sara Raafat; Mohammed Aleskandarany; Chitra Joseph; Angela Ogden; Shristi Bhattarai; Padmashree C G Rida; Francesca Khani; Melissa Davis; Olivier Elemento; Ritu Aneja; Ian O Ellis; Andrew Green; Nigel P Mongan; Emad Rakha
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Prediction of the axillary lymph node status in mammary cancer on the basis of clinicopathological data and flow cytometry.

Authors:  T Mattfeldt; H A Kestler; H P Sinn
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  A model building exercise of mortality risk for Taiwanese women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Tsai W Chang; Yao L Kuo
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Prediction of malignant breast lesions from MRI features: a comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression techniques.

Authors:  Christine E McLaren; Wen-Pin Chen; Ke Nie; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Comparison of the predictive qualities of three prognostic models of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Billie Anderson; J Michael Hardin; Dominik D Alexander; William E Grizzle; Sreelatha Meleth; Upender Manne
Journal:  Front Biosci (Elite Ed)       Date:  2010-06-01

8.  A network-based deep learning methodology for stratification of tumor mutations.

Authors:  Chuang Liu; Zhen Han; Zi-Ke Zhang; Ruth Nussinov; Feixiong Cheng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis.

Authors:  Joseph A Cruz; David S Wishart
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-02-11

10.  Accuracy validation of adjuvant! online in Taiwanese breast cancer patients--a 10-year analysis.

Authors:  Kuo Yao-Lung; Chen Dar-Ren; Chang Tsai-Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.