Literature DB >> 15587463

Prediction of the axillary lymph node status in mammary cancer on the basis of clinicopathological data and flow cytometry.

T Mattfeldt1, H A Kestler, H P Sinn.   

Abstract

Axillary lymph node status is a major prognostic factor in mammary carcinoma. It is clinically desirable to predict the axillary lymph node status from data from the mammary cancer specimen. In the study, the axillary lymph node status, routine histological parameters and flow-cytometric data were retrospectively obtained from 1139 specimens of invasive mammary cancer. The ten variables: age, tumour type, tumour grade, tumour size, skin infiltration, lymphangiosis carcinomatosa, pT4 category, percentage of tumour cells in G2/M- and S-phases of the cell cycle, and ploidy index were considered as predictor variables, and the single variable lymph node metastasis pN (0 for pN0, or 1 for pN1 or pN2) was used as an output variable. A stepwise logistic regression analysis, with the axillary lymph node as a dependent variable, was used for feature selection. Only lymphangiosis carcinomatosa and tumour size proved to be significant as independent predictor variables; the other variables were non-contributory. Three paradigms with supervised learning rules (multilayer perceptron, learning vector quantisation and support vector machines) were used for the purpose of prediction. If any of these paradigms was used with the information from all ten input variables, 73% of cases could be correctly predicted, with specificity ranging from 82 to 84% and sensitivity ranging from 60 to 63%. If only the two significant input variables were used, lymphangiosis carcinomatosa and tumour diameter, the prediction accuracy was no worse. Nearly identical results were obtained by two different techniques of cross-validation (leave-one-out against ten-fold cross validation). It was concluded that: artificial neural networks can be used for risk stratification on the basis of routine data in individual cases of mammary cancer; and lymphangiosis carcinomatosa and tumour size are independent predictors of axillary lymph node metastasis in mammary cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15587463     DOI: 10.1007/bf02345205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  29 in total

1.  Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data.

Authors:  T S Furey; N Cristianini; N Duffy; D W Bednarski; M Schummer; D Haussler
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Use of artificial neural networks in modeling associations of discriminant factors: towards an intelligent selective breast cancer screening.

Authors:  A L Ronco
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  Reasoning with uncertainty in pathology: artificial neural networks and logistic regression as tools for prediction of lymph node status in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  A M Marchevsky; S Shah; S Patel
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Application of the learning vector quantizer to the classification of breast lesions.

Authors:  C Markopoulos; P Karakitsos; E Botsoli-Stergiou; A Pouliakis; A Ioakim-Liossi; K Kyrkou; J Gogas
Journal:  Anal Quant Cytol Histol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 0.302

5.  Analysis of image cytometry data of fine needle aspirated cells of breast cancer patients: a comparison between logistic regression and artificial neural networks.

Authors:  H A Mat-Sakim; R N Naguib; M S Lakshmi; V Wadehra; T W Lennard; J Bhatavdekar; G V Sherbet
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Sentinel lymphadenectomy accurately predicts nodal status in T2 breast cancer.

Authors:  J A Olson; J Fey; J Winawer; P I Borgen; H S Cody; K J Van Zee; J Petrek; A S Heerdt
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Correlation of DNA flow cytometric results and other prognostic factors in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  G E Feichter; A Mueller; M Kaufmann; D Haag; I A Born; U Abel; K Klinga; F Kubli; K Goerttler
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1988-06-15       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Incidental carcinoma of the prostate: clinicopathological, stereological and immunohistochemical findings studied with logistic regression and self-organizing feature maps.

Authors:  T Mattfeldt; D Trijic; H W Gotffried; H A Kestler
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Classification of prostatic carcinoma with artificial neural networks using comparative genomic hybridization and quantitative stereological data.

Authors:  Torsten Mattfeldt; Hans-Werner Gottfried; Hubertus Wolter; Volker Schmidt; Hans A Kestler; Johannes Mayer
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.250

10.  Aberrant cytoplasmic expression of the p16 protein in breast cancer is associated with accelerated tumour proliferation.

Authors:  R Emig; A Magener; V Ehemann; A Meyer; F Stilgenbauer; M Volkmann; D Wallwiener; H P Sinn
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis.

Authors:  Joseph A Cruz; David S Wishart
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-02-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.