Literature DB >> 32404959

A novel prognostic two-gene signature for triple negative breast cancer.

Mansour A Alsaleem1,2, Graham Ball3, Michael S Toss1, Sara Raafat1, Mohammed Aleskandarany1,4, Chitra Joseph1, Angela Ogden5, Shristi Bhattarai5, Padmashree C G Rida5, Francesca Khani6, Melissa Davis7, Olivier Elemento8, Ritu Aneja5, Ian O Ellis1, Andrew Green1, Nigel P Mongan9,10, Emad Rakha11,12,13.   

Abstract

The absence of a robust risk stratification tool for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) underlies imprecise and nonselective treatment of these patients with cytotoxic chemotherapy. This study aimed to interrogate transcriptomes of TNBC resected samples using next generation sequencing to identify novel biomarkers associated with disease outcomes. A subset of cases (n = 112) from a large, well-characterized cohort of primary TNBC (n = 333) were subjected to RNA-sequencing. Reads were aligned to the human reference genome (GRCH38.83) using the STAR aligner and gene expression quantified using HTSEQ. We identified genes associated with distant metastasis-free survival and breast cancer-specific survival by applying supervised artificial neural network analysis with gene selection to the RNA-sequencing data. The prognostic ability of these genes was validated using the Breast Cancer Gene-Expression Miner v4. 0 and Genotype 2 outcome datasets. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified a prognostic gene signature that was independently associated with poor prognosis. Finally, we corroborated our results from the two-gene prognostic signature by their protein expression using immunohistochemistry. Artificial neural network identified two gene panels that strongly predicted distant metastasis-free survival and breast cancer-specific survival. Univariate Cox regression analysis of 21 genes common to both panels revealed that the expression level of eight genes was independently associated with poor prognosis (p < 0.05). Adjusting for clinicopathological factors including patient's age, grade, nodal stage, tumor size, and lymphovascular invasion using multivariate Cox regression analysis yielded a two-gene prognostic signature (ACSM4 and SPDYC), which was associated with poor prognosis (p < 0.05) independent of other prognostic variables. We validated the protein expression of these two genes, and it was significantly associated with patient outcome in both independent and combined manner (p < 0.05). Our study identifies a prognostic gene signature that can predict prognosis in TNBC patients and could potentially be used to guide the clinical management of TNBC patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32404959     DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0563-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  49 in total

Review 1.  Towards a novel classification of human malignancies based on gene expression patterns.

Authors:  A A Alizadeh; D T Ross; C M Perou; M van de Rijn
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 2.  Triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  William D Foulkes; Ian E Smith; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Bruce G Haffty; Qifeng Yang; Michael Reiss; Thomas Kearney; Susan A Higgins; Joanne Weidhaas; Lyndsay Harris; Willam Hait; Deborah Toppmeyer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence.

Authors:  Rebecca Dent; Maureen Trudeau; Kathleen I Pritchard; Wedad M Hanna; Harriet K Kahn; Carol A Sawka; Lavina A Lickley; Ellen Rawlinson; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Molecular features of triple negative breast cancer cells by genome-wide gene expression profiling analysis.

Authors:  Masato Komatsu; Tetsuro Yoshimaru; Taisuke Matsuo; Kazuma Kiyotani; Yasuo Miyoshi; Toshihito Tanahashi; Kazuhito Rokutan; Rui Yamaguchi; Ayumu Saito; Seiya Imoto; Satoru Miyano; Yusuke Nakamura; Mitsunori Sasa; Mitsuo Shimada; Toyomasa Katagiri
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 5.650

6.  Clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical features of microglandular adenosis and transition into in situ and invasive carcinoma.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Khalifeh; Constance Albarracin; Leslie K Diaz; Fraser W Symmans; Mary E Edgerton; Rosa F Hwang; Nour Sneige
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 7.  Multigene prognostic tests in breast cancer: past, present, future.

Authors:  Balázs Győrffy; Christos Hatzis; Tara Sanft; Erin Hofstatter; Bilge Aktas; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 8.  Molecular Classification of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sung Gwe Ahn; Seung Jun Kim; Cheungyeul Kim; Joon Jeong
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.588

9.  Triple-negative breast cancers are increased in black women regardless of age or body mass index.

Authors:  Lesley A Stead; Timothy L Lash; Jerome E Sobieraj; Dorcas D Chi; Jennifer L Westrup; Marjory Charlot; Rita A Blanchard; John C Lee; Thomas C King; Carol L Rosenberg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Refinement of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Selection.

Authors:  Brian D Lehmann; Bojana Jovanović; Xi Chen; Monica V Estrada; Kimberly N Johnson; Yu Shyr; Harold L Moses; Melinda E Sanders; Jennifer A Pietenpol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  Development and external validation of a composite immune-clinical prognostic model associated with EGFR mutation in East-Asian patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chengming Liu; Sufei Zheng; Sihui Wang; Xinfeng Wang; Xiaoli Feng; Nan Sun; Jie He
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 8.168

2.  A network approach reveals driver genes associated with survival of patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Courtney D Dill; Eric B Dammer; Ti'ara L Griffen; Nicholas T Seyfried; James W Lillard
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-04-19

3.  Avoiding Absolute Quantification Trap: A Novel Predictive Signature of Clinical Benefit to Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Chengming Liu; Sihui Wang; Sufei Zheng; Fei Xu; Zheng Cao; Xiaoli Feng; Yan Wang; Qi Xue; Nan Sun; Jie He
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  A Novel Seven Gene Signature-Based Prognostic Model to Predict Distant Metastasis of Lymph Node-Negative Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Wenting Peng; Caijin Lin; Shanshan Jing; Guanhua Su; Xi Jin; Genhong Di; Zhiming Shao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  A Novel Prognostic Four-Gene Signature of Breast Cancer Identified by Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Zhao; Huimin Yan; Xueqing Yan; Zhilin Chen; Rui Zhuo
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 3.434

6.  High Expression of RAI14 in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Participates in Immune Recruitment and Implies Poor Prognosis Through Bioinformatics Analyses.

Authors:  Ranliang Cui; Ting Zhao; Changsen Bai; Ning Ji; Jialei Hua; Li Ren; Yueguo Li
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.988

7.  An immune-related prognostic signature for predicting breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Zelin Tian; Jianing Tang; Xing Liao; Qian Yang; Yumin Wu; Gaosong Wu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Identification of a 9-gene prognostic signature for breast cancer.

Authors:  Zelin Tian; Jianing Tang; Xing Liao; Qian Yang; Yumin Wu; Gaosong Wu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 9.  Prognostic Cancer Gene Expression Signatures: Current Status and Challenges.

Authors:  Yuquan Qian; Jimmy Daza; Timo Itzel; Johannes Betge; Tianzuo Zhan; Frederik Marmé; Andreas Teufel
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Genome Instability-Derived Genes Are Novel Prognostic Biomarkers for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Maoni Guo; San Ming Wang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.