Literature DB >> 16767468

An artificial neural network improves prediction of observed survival in patients with laryngeal squamous carcinoma.

Andrew S Jones1, Azzam G F Taktak, Timothy R Helliwell, John E Fenton, Martin A Birchall, David J Husband, Anthony C Fisher.   

Abstract

The accepted method of modelling and predicting failure/survival, Cox's proportional hazards model, is theoretically inferior to neural network derived models for analysing highly complex systems with large datasets. A blinded comparison of the neural network versus the Cox's model in predicting survival utilising data from 873 treated patients with laryngeal cancer. These were divided randomly and equally into a training set and a study set and Cox's and neural network models applied in turn. Data were then divided into seven sets of binary covariates and the analysis repeated. Overall survival was not significantly different on Kaplan-Meier plot, or with either test model. Although the network produced qualitatively similar results to Cox's model it was significantly more sensitive to differences in survival curves for age and N stage. We propose that neural networks are capable of prediction in systems involving complex interactions between variables and non-linearity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16767468     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-006-0021-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  21 in total

1.  An evaluation of intelligent prognostic systems for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S S Anand; A E Smith; P W Hamilton; J S Anand; J G Hughes; P H Bartels
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 2.  Artificial neural networks for diagnosis and prognosis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guido Schwarzer; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  Semin Urol Oncol       Date:  2002-05

3.  A Bayesian neural network approach for modelling censored data with an application to prognosis after surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  P J G Lisboa; H Wong; P Harris; R Swindell
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 4.  Advanced statistical methods for the definition of new staging models.

Authors:  Ronald Kates; Manfred Schmitt; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2003

5.  Feed forward neural networks for the analysis of censored survival data: a partial logistic regression approach.

Authors:  E Biganzoli; P Boracchi; L Mariani; E Marubini
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Survival prediction using artificial neural networks in patients with uterine cervical cancer treated by radiation therapy alone.

Authors:  Takashi Ochi; Kenya Murase; Takashi Fujii; Masashi Kawamura; Junpei Ikezoe
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  A combined neural network and decision trees model for prognosis of breast cancer relapse.

Authors:  José M Jerez-Aragonés; José A Gómez-Ruiz; Gonzalo Ramos-Jiménez; José Muñoz-Pérez; Emilio Alba-Conejo
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.326

8.  Survival analysis of censored data: neural network analysis detection of complex interactions between variables.

Authors:  M De Laurentiis; P M Ravdin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Artificial neural networks improve the accuracy of cancer survival prediction.

Authors:  H B Burke; P H Goodman; D B Rosen; D E Henson; J N Weinstein; F E Harrell; J R Marks; D P Winchester; D G Bostwick
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Forecasting the performance status of head and neck cancer patient treatment by an interval arithmetic pruned perceptron.

Authors:  Gian Paolo Drago; Ernesto Setti; Lisa Licitra; Diego Liberati
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  6 in total

1.  Assessing the effect of quantitative and qualitative predictors on gastric cancer individuals survival using hierarchical artificial neural network models.

Authors:  Zohreh Amiri; Kazem Mohammad; Mahmood Mahmoudi; Mahbubeh Parsaeian; Hojjat Zeraati
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 0.611

2.  A Simulation Study to Compare the Predictive Performance of Survival Neural Networks with Cox Models for Clinical Trial Data.

Authors:  Georgios Kantidakis; Elia Biganzoli; Hein Putter; Marta Fiocco
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 3.  Neural Networks for Survival Prediction in Medicine Using Prognostic Factors: A Review and Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Georgios Kantidakis; Audinga-Dea Hazewinkel; Marta Fiocco
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Application of artificial neural network in predicting the survival rate of gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  A Biglarian; E Hajizadeh; A Kazemnejad; Mr Zali
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 1.429

5.  Five Years Survival of Patients After Liver Transplantation and Its Effective Factors by Neural Network and Cox Poroportional Hazard Regression Models.

Authors:  Bahareh Khosravi; Saeedeh Pourahmad; Amin Bahreini; Saman Nikeghbalian; Goli Mehrdad
Journal:  Hepat Mon       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 0.660

6.  Survival prediction models since liver transplantation - comparisons between Cox models and machine learning techniques.

Authors:  Georgios Kantidakis; Hein Putter; Carlo Lancia; Jacob de Boer; Andries E Braat; Marta Fiocco
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.