Literature DB >> 24684250

The impact of payment source and hospital type on rising cesarean section rates in Brazil, 1998 to 2008.

Kristine Hopkins1, Ernesto Friedrich de Lima Amaral, Aline Nogueira Menezes Mourão.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High cesarean section rates in Brazilian public hospitals and higher rates in private hospitals are well established. Less is known about the relationship between payment source and cesarean section rates within public and private hospitals.
METHODS: We analyzed the 1998, 2003, and 2008 rounds of a nationally representative household survey (PNAD), which includes type of delivery, where it took place, and who paid for it. We construct cesarean section rates for various categories, and perform logistic regression to determine the relative importance of independent variables on cesarean section rates for all births and first births only.
RESULTS: Brazilian cesarean section rates were 42 percent in 1998 and 53 percent in 2008. Women who delivered publicly funded births in either public or private hospitals had lower cesarean section rates than those who delivered privately financed deliveries in public or private hospitals. Multivariate models suggest that older age, higher education, and living outside the Northeast region all positively affect the odds of delivering by cesarean section; effects are attenuated by the payment source-hospital type variable for all women and even more so among first births.
CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean section rates have risen substantially in Brazil. It is important to distinguish payment source for the delivery to have a better understanding of those rates.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brazil; cesarean section; hospital type; nonclinical factors; payment source

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24684250      PMCID: PMC4426198          DOI: 10.1111/birt.12106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  17 in total

1.  Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America.

Authors:  José Villar; Eliette Valladares; Daniel Wojdyla; Nelly Zavaleta; Guillermo Carroli; Alejandro Velazco; Archana Shah; Liana Campodónico; Vicente Bataglia; Anibal Faundes; Ana Langer; Alberto Narváez; Allan Donner; Mariana Romero; Sofia Reynoso; Karla Simônia de Pádua; Daniel Giordano; Marius Kublickas; Arnaldo Acosta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-06-03       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates.

Authors:  Ana P Betrán; Mario Merialdi; Jeremy A Lauer; Wang Bing-Shun; Jane Thomas; Paul Van Look; Marsden Wagner
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.980

3.  Is a rising cesarean delivery rate inevitable? Trends in industrialized countries, 1987 to 2007.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Robin Young; Howard Cabral; Jeffrey Ecker
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.689

4.  Epidemic of caesarean sections in Brazil.

Authors:  F C Barros; J P Vaughan; C G Victora; S R Huttly
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  [Voluntary surgical sterilization in Greater Metropolitan Campinas, São Paulo State, Brazil, before and after legal regulation of the procedure].

Authors:  Luiz Eduardo Campos de Carvalho; Maria José Duarte Osis; José Guilherme Cecatti; Silvana Ferreira Bento; Márcia B Manfrinati
Journal:  Cad Saude Publica       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.632

6.  Frustrated demand for postpartum female sterilization in Brazil.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Ignez H O Perpétuo; Elza Berquó; Kristine Hopkins; Ondina Fachel Leal; Maria Célia de Carvalho Formiga; Marta Rovery Souza
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Kristine Hopkins; Anibal Faúndes; Ignez Perpétuo
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.689

8.  [Female sterilization, AIDS, and medical culture in São Paulo and Porto Alegre, Brazil].

Authors:  Regina Maria Barbosa; Daniela Riva Knauth
Journal:  Cad Saude Publica       Date:  2004-03-08       Impact factor: 1.632

9.  Caesarean delivery in South Italy: women without choice. A cross sectional survey.

Authors:  Pamela Barbadoro; Carlos Chiatti; Marcello Mario D'Errico; Francesco Di Stanislao; Emilia Prospero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Do Italian women prefer cesarean section? Results from a survey on mode of delivery preferences.

Authors:  Maria Regina Torloni; Ana Pilar Betrán; Pilar Montilla; Elisa Scolaro; Armando Seuc; Agustina Mazzoni; Fernando Althabe; Francesca Merzagora; Gian Paolo Donzelli; Mario Merialdi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  8 in total

1.  Trends in the Mode of Delivery of Pregnant Women in Rural Guatemala from a Quality Improvement Database.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Sharon Scarbro; Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga; Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano; Saskia Bunge-Montes; Guillermo A Bolaños; Molly Lamb; Edwin J Asturias; Stephen Berman; Gretchen Heinrichs
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-04

2.  Born in Brazil: shining a light for change.

Authors:  Maria Regina Torloni; Ana Pilar Betrán; José M Belizán
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.223

3.  Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth.

Authors:  Marcos Nakamura-Pereira; Maria do Carmo Leal; Ana Paula Esteves-Pereira; Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues; Jacqueline Alves Torres; Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias; Maria Elisabeth Moreira
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  Determinants and materno-fetal outcomes related to cesarean section delivery in private and public hospitals in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Authors:  Idrissa Beogo; Bomar Mendez Rojas; Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-14

5.  Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Medina Braha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; David C Goodman; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Publicly insured caesarean sections in private hospitals: a repeated cross-sectional analysis in Chile.

Authors:  Florencia Borrescio-Higa; Nieves Valdés
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Caesarean birth rates in public and privately funded hospitals: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Bruna Dias Alonso; Flora Maria Barbosa da Silva; Maria do Rosário Dias de Oliveira Latorre; Carmen Simone Grilo Diniz; Debra Bick
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.106

8.  Effects on developmental outcomes after cesarean birth versus vaginal birth in Chinese children aged 1-59 months: a cross-sectional community-based survey.

Authors:  Hong Zhou; Yuan Ding; Yuning Yang; Siyu Zou; Xueqi Qu; Anqi Wang; Xi Wang; Yue Huang; Xintong Li; Xiaona Huang; Yan Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.