Literature DB >> 10567956

Constructing a prediction interval for time to reach a threshold concentration based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis: an application to basiliximab in renal transplantation.

F Mentré1, J Kovarik, C Gerbeau.   

Abstract

Basiliximab is an immunosuppressant chimeric monoclonal antibody directed to the human interleukin-2 receptor alpha-chain used for prevention of acute rejection episodes in organ transplantation. The minimally effective serum concentration necessary to saturate receptor epitopes in kidney transplant patients is 0.2 microgram/ml. To guide dose selection for Phase 3 efficacy trials, a population pharmacostatistical model was fitted to intensively sampled Phase 2 pharmacokinetic data. This served as a basis from which to examine candidate dose regimens with respect to the duration over which receptor-saturating concentrations would be achieved posttransplant. Three prediction methods were assessed: one based on simulations, and two others based on first-order approximation using either inverse regression or inversion of confidence intervals. An 80% prediction interval was generated by each method to evaluate its predictive performance against prospectively collected Phase 3 data in 39 renal transplant patients who received two injections of 20 mg basiliximab, one prior to surgery and one on Day 4 posttransplant. All methods provided correct prediction of the duration of receptor-saturating concentration. As anticipated, the best performance was obtained from the simulation method which predicted 30 values in the 80% prediction interval, 19.7-52.7 days. The actually observed 80% interval from the Phase 3 data was 23.7-58.3 days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10567956     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020658023774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm        ISSN: 0090-466X


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of population pharmacokinetic modeling methods using simulated data: results from the Population Modeling Workgroup.

Authors:  D J Roe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  The effect of variance function estimation on nonlinear calibration inference in immunoassay data.

Authors:  B A Belanger; M Davidian; D M Giltinan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Multiple estimation of concentrations in immunoassay using logistic models.

Authors:  J F Robison-Cox
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1995-10-12       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Assays for recombinant proteins: a problem in non-linear calibration.

Authors:  D M Giltinan; M Davidian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Alternative approaches to estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters: comparison with the nonlinear mixed-effect model.

Authors:  J L Steimer; A Mallet; J L Golmard; J F Boisvieux
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.518

6.  Disposition of basiliximab, an interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, in recipients of mismatched cadaver renal allografts.

Authors:  J Kovarik; P Wolf; J M Cisterne; G Mourad; Y Lebranchu; P Lang; B Bourbigot; D Cantarovich; D Girault; C Gerbeau; A G Schmidt; J P Soulillou
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Early versus late acute renal allograft rejection: impact on chronic rejection.

Authors:  G P Basadonna; A J Matas; K J Gillingham; W D Payne; D L Dunn; D E Sutherland; P F Gores; R W Gruessner; J S Najarian
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Prolonged action of a chimeric interleukin-2 receptor (CD25) monoclonal antibody used in cadaveric renal transplantation.

Authors:  P L Amlot; E Rawlings; O N Fernando; P J Griffin; G Heinrich; M H Schreier; J P Castaigne; R Moore; P Sweny
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Randomised trial of basiliximab versus placebo for control of acute cellular rejection in renal allograft recipients. CHIB 201 International Study Group.

Authors:  B Nashan; R Moore; P Amlot; A G Schmidt; K Abeywickrama; J P Soulillou
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-10-25       Impact factor: 79.321

  9 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Population pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Nathanael L Dirks; Bernd Meibohm
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling of monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Miroslav Dostalek; Iain Gardner; Brian M Gurbaxani; Rachel H Rose; Manoranjenni Chetty
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Immunosuppressive therapy for paediatric transplant patients: pharmacokinetic considerations.

Authors:  María del Mar Fernández De Gatta; Dolores Santos-Buelga; Alfonso Domínguez-Gil; María José García
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  A benefit-risk assessment of basiliximab in renal transplantation.

Authors:  Ugo Boggi; Romano Danesi; Fabio Vistoli; Marco Del Chiaro; Stefano Signori; Piero Marchetti; Mario Del Tacca; Franco Mosca
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Population pharmacokinetics of sibrotuzumab, a novel therapeutic monoclonal antibody, in cancer patients.

Authors:  C Kloft; E-U Graefe; P Tanswell; A M Scott; R Hofheinz; A Amelsberg; M O Karlsson
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 6.  Potential Sources of Inter-Subject Variability in Monoclonal Antibody Pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Katherine L Gill; Krishna K Machavaram; Rachel H Rose; Manoranjenni Chetty
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Standard induction with basiliximab versus no induction in low immunological risk kidney transplant recipients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Aziza Ajlan; Hassan Aleid; Tariq Zulfiquar Ali; Hala Joharji; Khalid Almeshari; Ahmed Mohammed Nazmi; Yaser Shah; Edward Devol; Dalal Alkortas; Zinah Alabdulkarim; Dieter Broering; Ibrahim Alahmadi; Asad Ullah; Anwar Alotaibi; Ahmed Aljedai
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.