Literature DB >> 6745083

Alternative approaches to estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters: comparison with the nonlinear mixed-effect model.

J L Steimer, A Mallet, J L Golmard, J F Boisvieux.   

Abstract

Individual pharmacokinetic parameters can be viewed as independent realizations of a random variable. The probability density function of the variable is assumed to be specified by its first two moments (mean vector and covariance matrix), and these moments then characterize the distribution of the parameters in the population. The following methods are presented for estimation of population characteristics from a set of pharmacokinetic measurements in a sample of subjects: The Global Two-Stage Approach (GTS) uses estimates (and their covariances) of individual parameters obtained after separate fitting of each individual's data. The Iterated Two-Stage Approach (ITS) makes the GTS procedure iterative, using refined bayesian estimates of individual parameters at each step. The Nonlinear Filtering Approach (NLF) also relies on individual parameter estimates produced by using an optimal filter on each subject's data. The three methods give exact results (maximum likelihood estimates), as does NONMEM (the Nonlinear Mixed-Effect Model Approach), when the individual pharmacokinetic model is linear with respect to the parameters and when the distributions of the pharmacokinetic parameters and of the measurement noise in the individual data are both multivariate normal. When the individual pharmacokinetic model is statistically nonlinear (the usual case), the methods differ with respect to: (1) their strategy for handling nonlinearity, (2) their ability to deal with any type of data (experimental and/or routine), and (3) their sensitivity to the amplitude of random effects. With regard to computational aspects, both the computer memory storage requirements and the amount of computation required for the GTS approach are much smaller than for the three other methods. Contrasting considerations as well as results of simulations suggest that GTS, ITS, and, in future, NLF may be valuable alternatives to NONMEM or modifications of it for estimation of population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6745083     DOI: 10.3109/03602538409015066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Rev        ISSN: 0360-2532            Impact factor:   4.518


  75 in total

1.  Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single oral doses of BCH-10652 in healthy adult males.

Authors:  P F Smith; A Forrest; C H Ballow; D E Martin; L Proulx
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  A model-based approach for assessing in vivo combination therapy interactions.

Authors:  A M Lopez; M D Pegram; D J Slamon; E M Landaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Large scale analysis of routine dose adjustments of mycophenolate mofetil based on global exposure in renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Franck Saint-Marcoux; Soizic Vandierdonck; Aurélie Prémaud; Jean Debord; Annick Rousseau; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Smooth nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation for population pharmacokinetics, with application to quinidine.

Authors:  M Davidian; A R Gallant
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1992-10

5.  Novel pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for prediction of outcomes with an extended-release formulation of ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  Alison K Meagher; Alan Forrest; Axel Dalhoff; Heino Stass; Jerome J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Performance comparison of various maximum likelihood nonlinear mixed-effects estimation methods for dose-response models.

Authors:  Elodie L Plan; Alan Maloney; France Mentré; Mats O Karlsson; Julie Bertrand
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Modeling population heterogeneity in viral dynamics for chronic hepatitis C infection: Insights from Phase 3 telaprevir clinical studies.

Authors:  Eric L Haseltine; Holly Kimko; Haobin Luo; John Tolsma; Doug J Bartels; Tara L Kieffer; Varun Garg
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 8.  Non-linear mixed effects modeling - from methodology and software development to driving implementation in drug development science.

Authors:  Goonaseelan Colin Pillai; France Mentré; Jean-Louis Steimer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 9.  Population pharmacokinetic studies in pediatrics: issues in design and analysis.

Authors:  Bernd Meibohm; Stephanie Läer; John C Panetta; Jeffrey S Barrett
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

10.  Evaluation of hepatic function using the pharmacokinetics of a therapeutically administered drug. Application to the immunosuppressant cyclosporin.

Authors:  W Weber; M Looby; J Brockmöller
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.