Literature DB >> 23299465

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling of monoclonal antibodies.

Miroslav Dostalek1, Iain Gardner, Brian M Gurbaxani, Rachel H Rose, Manoranjenni Chetty.   

Abstract

Development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and their functional derivatives represents a growing segment of the development pipeline in the pharmaceutical industry. More than 25 mAbs and derivatives have been approved for a variety of therapeutic applications. In addition, around 500 mAbs and derivatives are currently in different stages of development. mAbs are considered to be large molecule therapeutics (in general, they are 2-3 orders of magnitude larger than small chemical molecule therapeutics), but they are not just big chemicals. These compounds demonstrate much more complex pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behaviour than small molecules. Because of their large size and relatively poor membrane permeability and instability in the conditions of the gastrointestinal tract, parenteral administration is the most usual route of administration. The rate and extent of mAb distribution is very slow and depends on extravasation in tissue, distribution within the particular tissue, and degradation. Elimination primarily happens via catabolism to peptides and amino acids. Although not definitive, work has been published to define the human tissues mainly involved in the elimination of mAbs, and it seems that many cells throughout the body are involved. mAbs can be targeted against many soluble or membrane-bound targets, thus these compounds may act by a variety of mechanisms to achieve their pharmacological effect. mAbs targeting soluble antigen generally exhibit linear elimination, whereas those targeting membrane-bound antigen often exhibit non-linear elimination, mainly due to target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD). The high-affinity interaction of mAbs and their derivatives with the pharmacological target can often result in non-linear pharmacokinetics. Because of species differences (particularly due to differences in target affinity and abundance) in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mAbs, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of mAbs has been used routinely to expedite the development of mAbs and their derivatives and has been utilized to help in the selection of appropriate dose regimens. Although modelling approaches have helped to explain variability in both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of these drugs, there is a clear need for more complex models to improve understanding of pharmacokinetic processes and pharmacodynamic interactions of mAbs with the immune system. There are different approaches applied to physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling of mAbs and important differences between the models developed. Some key additional features that need to be accounted for in PBPK models of mAbs are neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn; an important salvage mechanism for antibodies) binding, TMDD and lymph flow. Several models have been described incorporating some or all of these features and the use of PBPK models are expected to expand over the next few years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23299465     DOI: 10.1007/s40262-012-0027-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  384 in total

1.  Meningococcal disease and polymorphism of FcgammaRIIa (CD32) in late complement component-deficient individuals.

Authors:  A E Platonov; E J Kuijper; I V Vershinina; G A Shipulin; N Westerdaal; C A Fijen; J G van de Winkel
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Chemical generation of bispecific antibodies.

Authors:  Venkata R Doppalapudi; Jie Huang; Dingguo Liu; Ping Jin; Bin Liu; Lingna Li; Joel Desharnais; Crystal Hagen; Nancy J Levin; Michael J Shields; Michelle Parish; Robert E Murphy; Joselyn Del Rosario; Bryan D Oates; Jing-Yu Lai; Marla J Matin; Zemeda Ainekulu; Abhijit Bhat; Curt W Bradshaw; Gary Woodnutt; Richard A Lerner; Rodney W Lappe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Important role of proinflammatory cytokines/other endogenous substances in drug-induced hepatotoxicity: depression of drug metabolism during infections/inflammation states, and genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes/cytokines may markedly contribute to this pathology.

Authors:  Joseph Prandota
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.688

Review 4.  Interspecies scaling of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: initial look.

Authors:  Jie Ling; Honghui Zhou; Qun Jiao; Hugh M Davis
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.126

5.  Regulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters in infection, inflammation, and cancer.

Authors:  Edward T Morgan; Kerry B Goralski; Micheline Piquette-Miller; Kenneth W Renton; Graham R Robertson; Madhusudana R Chaluvadi; Kellie A Charles; Stephen J Clarke; Marina Kacevska; Christopher Liddle; Terrilyn A Richardson; Rohini Sharma; Christopher J Sinal
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.922

6.  Reduction in cytochrome P-450 enzyme expression is associated with repression of CAR (constitutive androstane receptor) and PXR (pregnane X receptor) in mouse liver during the acute phase response.

Authors:  Anne P Beigneux; Arthur H Moser; Judy K Shigenaga; Carl Grunfeld; Kenneth R Feingold
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2002-04-26       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Evidence-based (S3) guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris.

Authors:  Alexander Nast; Ina B Kopp; Matthias Augustin; Kirstin-Benita Banditt; Wolf-Henning Boehncke; Markus Follmann; Markus Friedrich; Matthias Huber; Christina Kahl; Joachim Klaus; Joachim Koza; Inga Kreiselmaier; Johannes Mohr; Ulrich Mrowietz; Hans-Michael Ockenfels; Hans-Dieter Orzechowski; Jörg Prinz; Kristian Reich; Thomas Rosenbach; Stefanie Rosumeck; Martin Schlaeger; Gerhard Schmid-Ott; Michael Sebastian; Volker Streit; Tobias Weberschock; Berthold Rzany
Journal:  J Dtsch Dermatol Ges       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.584

Review 8.  The role of complement in the mechanism of action of rituximab for B-cell lymphoma: implications for therapy.

Authors:  Xuhui Zhou; Weiguo Hu; Xuebin Qin
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2008-09-08

Review 9.  Engineering therapeutic antibodies for improved function.

Authors:  L G Presta; R L Shields; A K Namenuk; K Hong; Y G Meng
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.407

10.  Phase I clinical trial using escalating single-dose infusion of chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (IDEC-C2B8) in patients with recurrent B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  D G Maloney; T M Liles; D K Czerwinski; C Waldichuk; J Rosenberg; A Grillo-Lopez; R Levy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1994-10-15       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  88 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for dosing immunoglobulin in obese patients.

Authors:  J P Hodkinson
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Transfer of single dose of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab and bevacizumab into milk of sheep.

Authors:  Tugba Cakmak Argun; Ozlem Yalcin Tok; Levent Tok; Gulsen Yilmaz; Fatma Meric Yilmaz; Alime Gunes; Mehmet Argun; Osman Butuner
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Balancing charge in the complementarity-determining regions of humanized mAbs without affecting pI reduces non-specific binding and improves the pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Amita Datta-Mannan; Arunkumar Thangaraju; Donmienne Leung; Ying Tang; Derrick R Witcher; Jirong Lu; Victor J Wroblewski
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic de-risking tools for selection of monoclonal antibody lead candidates.

Authors:  Miroslav Dostalek; Thomayant Prueksaritanont; Robert F Kelley
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 5.857

5.  Physiologically-based modeling to predict the clinical behavior of monoclonal antibodies directed against lymphocyte antigens.

Authors:  Patrick M Glassman; Joseph P Balthasar
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 6.  Development of bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer: pharmacodynamic modeling, survival impact and toxicology.

Authors:  Ramez N Eskander; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.404

7.  Impact of altered endogenous IgG on unspecific mAb clearance.

Authors:  Saskia Fuhrmann; Charlotte Kloft; Wilhelm Huisinga
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rilotumumab: a decade of experience in preclinical and clinical cancer research.

Authors:  Y Zhang; S Doshi; M Zhu
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  VEGF neutralizing aerosol therapy in primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma with K-ras activating-mutations.

Authors:  Virginie Hervé; Nathalie Rabbe; Laurent Guilleminault; Flora Paul; Laurène Schlick; Nicolas Azzopardi; Michael Duruisseaux; Delphine Fouquenet; Jérôme Montharu; Françoise Redini; Gilles Paintaud; Etienne Lemarié; Jacques Cadranel; Marie Wislez; Nathalie Heuzé-Vourc'h
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.857

10.  Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bezlotoxumab in Adults with Primary and Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  Ka Lai Yee; Huub Jan Kleijn; Thomas Kerbusch; Randolph P Matthews; Mary Beth Dorr; Kevin W Garey; Rebecca E Wrishko
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.