Literature DB >> 20818831

Population pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

Nathanael L Dirks1, Bernd Meibohm.   

Abstract

A growing number of population pharmacokinetic analyses of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been published in the scientific literature. The aims of this article are to summarize the findings from these studies and to relate the findings to the general pharmacokinetic and structural characteristics of therapeutic mAbs. A two-compartment model was used in the majority of the population analyses to describe the disposition of the mAb. Population estimates of the volumes of distribution in the central (V(1)) and peripheral (V(2)) compartments were typically small, with median (range) values of 3.1 (2.4-5.5) L and 2.8 (1.3-6.8) L, respectively. The estimated between-subject variability in the V(1) was usually moderate, with a median (range) coefficient of variation (CV) of 26% (12-84%). Between-subject variability in other distribution-related parameters such as the V(2) and intercompartmental clearance were often not estimated. Although the pharmacokinetic models used most frequently in the population analyses were models with linear clearance, other models with nonlinear, or parallel linear and nonlinear clearance pathways were also applied, as many therapeutic mAbs are eliminated via saturable target-mediated mechanisms. Population estimates of the maximum elimination rate (V(max)) and the mAb concentration at which elimination was at half maximum for Michaelis-Menten-type elimination pathways varied considerably among the different therapeutic mAbs. However, estimates of the total clearance (CL) of mAbs with linear clearance characteristics and of the clearance of mAbs via the linear clearance pathway (CL(L)) with parallel linear and nonlinear clearance were quite similar for the different mAbs and typically ranged from 0.2 to 0.5 L/day, which is relatively close to the estimated clearance of endogenous IgG of 0.21 L/day. The between-subject variability in the V(max), CL and CL(L) was moderate to high, with estimated CVs ranging from 15% to 65%. Measures of body size were the covariates most commonly identified as influencing the pharmacokinetics of therapeutic mAbs. In summary, many features of the population pharmacokinetics of currently used therapeutic mAbs are similar, despite differences in their pharmacological targets and studied patient populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20818831     DOI: 10.2165/11535960-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  88 in total

Review 1.  Recommended reading in population pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Peter L Bonate
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Monoclonal antibodies as innovative therapeutics.

Authors:  Janice M Reichert
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.837

3.  Therapeutic activity of humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and polymorphism in IgG Fc receptor FcgammaRIIIa gene.

Authors:  Guillaume Cartron; Laurent Dacheux; Gilles Salles; Philippe Solal-Celigny; Pierre Bardos; Philippe Colombat; Hervé Watier
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Identifiability and indistinguishability of nonlinear pharmacokinetic models.

Authors:  K R Godfrey; M J Chapman; S Vajda
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1994-06

5.  ING-1, a monoclonal antibody targeting Ep-CAM in patients with advanced adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Johann S de Bono; Anthony W Tolcher; Andre Forero; Gertrude F A Vanhove; Chris Takimoto; Robert J Bauer; Lisa A Hammond; Amita Patnaik; Mark L White; Sui Shen; Muhammad B Khazaeli; Eric K Rowinsky; Albert F LoBuglio
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Panitumumab the first fully human monoclonal antibody: from the bench to the clinic.

Authors:  Michael Cohenuram; Muhammad Wasif Saif
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.248

7.  A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of single doses of clenoliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D R Mould; C B Davis; E A Minthorn; D C Kwok; M J Elliott; M E Luggen; M C Totoritis
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Evidence to support the cellular mechanism involved in serum IgG homeostasis in humans.

Authors:  E Sally Ward; Jinchun Zhou; Victor Ghetie; Raimund J Ober
Journal:  Int Immunol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.823

9.  Infliximab pharmacokinetics in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

Authors:  David Ternant; Alexandre Aubourg; Charlotte Magdelaine-Beuzelin; Danielle Degenne; Hervé Watier; Laurence Picon; Gilles Paintaud
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.681

10.  Denosumab: an investigational drug for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2008-12
View more
  183 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses as the basis for dosing of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Bernd Meibohm
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Theoretical considerations of target-mediated drug disposition models: simplifications and approximations.

Authors:  Peiming Ma
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  A guide to rational dosing of monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Shuang Bai; Karin Jorga; Yan Xin; Denise Jin; Yanan Zheng; Lisa A Damico-Beyer; Manish Gupta; Meina Tang; David E Allison; Dan Lu; Yi Zhang; Amita Joshi; Mark J Dresser
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Immunogenicity to therapeutic proteins: impact on PK/PD and efficacy.

Authors:  Narendra Chirmule; Vibha Jawa; Bernd Meibohm
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Pharmacokinetics of MHAA4549A, an Anti-Influenza A Monoclonal Antibody, in Healthy Subjects Challenged with Influenza A Virus in a Phase IIa Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Rong Deng; Ai Ping Lee; Mauricio Maia; Jeremy J Lim; Tracy Burgess; Priscilla Horn; Michael A Derby; Elizabeth Newton; Jorge A Tavel; William D Hanley
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic-disease progression model for effects of anakinra in Lewis rats with collagen-induced arthritis.

Authors:  Dongyang Liu; Hoi-Kei Lon; Debra C Dubois; Richard R Almon; William J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 2.745

7.  Impact of altered endogenous IgG on unspecific mAb clearance.

Authors:  Saskia Fuhrmann; Charlotte Kloft; Wilhelm Huisinga
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rilotumumab: a decade of experience in preclinical and clinical cancer research.

Authors:  Y Zhang; S Doshi; M Zhu
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Population Pharmacokinetics of ABT-806, an Investigational Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Monoclonal Antibody, in Advanced Solid Tumor Types Likely to Either Over-Express Wild-Type EGFR or Express Variant III Mutant EGFR.

Authors:  Shringi Sharma; Rajendar K Mittapalli; Kyle D Holen; Hao Xiong
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Subcutaneous Site-of-Absorption Study with the Monoclonal Antibody Tocilizumab in Minipigs: Administration Behind Ear Translates Best to Humans.

Authors:  Wolfgang F Richter; Hans-Peter Grimm; Marie-Hélène Gouy; Susi Søgaard; Caroline Kreuzer; Uwe Wessels; Dragomir Draganov; Chris Muenzer; Tonio Hoche
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.