PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to establish a protocol for measuring myocardial blood flow (MBF) by PET/CT in healthy cats. The rationale was its future use in Maine Coon cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) as a model for human HCM. METHODS: MBF was measured in nine anaesthetized healthy cats using a PET/CT scanner and (13)NH(3) at rest and during adenosine infusion. Each cat was randomly assigned to receive vasodilator stress with two or three adenosine infusions at the following rates (microg/kg per minute): 140 (Ado 1, standard rate for humans), 280 (Ado 2, twice the human standard rate), 560 (Ado 4), 840 (Ado 6) and 1,120 (Ado 8). RESULTS: The median MBF at rest was 1.26 ml/min per g (n = 9; range 0.88-1.72 ml/min per g). There was no significant difference at Ado 1 (n = 3; median 1.35, range 0.93-1.55 ml/min per g; ns) but MBF was significantly greater at Ado 2 (n = 6; 2.16, range 1.35-2.68 ml/min per g; p < 0.05) and Ado 4 (n = 6; 2.11, 1.92-2.45 ml/min per g; p < 0.05). Large ranges of MBF values at Ado 6 (n = 4; 2.53, 2.32-5.63 ml/min per g; ns) and Ado 8 (n = 3; 2.21, 1.92-5.70 ml/min per g; ns) were noted. Observed adverse effects, including hypotension, AV-block and ventricular premature contractions, were all mild, of short duration and immediately reversed after cessation of the adenosine infusion. CONCLUSION: MBF can be safely measured in cats using PET. An intravenous adenosine infusion at a rate of 280 microg/kg per minute seems most appropriate to induce maximal hyperaemic MBF response in healthy cats. Higher adenosine rates appear less suitable as they are associated with a large heterogeneity in flow increase and rate pressure product, most probably due to the large variability in haemodynamic and heart rate response.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to establish a protocol for measuring myocardial blood flow (MBF) by PET/CT in healthy cats. The rationale was its future use in Maine Coon cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) as a model for human HCM. METHODS: MBF was measured in nine anaesthetized healthy cats using a PET/CT scanner and (13)NH(3) at rest and during adenosine infusion. Each cat was randomly assigned to receive vasodilator stress with two or three adenosine infusions at the following rates (microg/kg per minute): 140 (Ado 1, standard rate for humans), 280 (Ado 2, twice the human standard rate), 560 (Ado 4), 840 (Ado 6) and 1,120 (Ado 8). RESULTS: The median MBF at rest was 1.26 ml/min per g (n = 9; range 0.88-1.72 ml/min per g). There was no significant difference at Ado 1 (n = 3; median 1.35, range 0.93-1.55 ml/min per g; ns) but MBF was significantly greater at Ado 2 (n = 6; 2.16, range 1.35-2.68 ml/min per g; p < 0.05) and Ado 4 (n = 6; 2.11, 1.92-2.45 ml/min per g; p < 0.05). Large ranges of MBF values at Ado 6 (n = 4; 2.53, 2.32-5.63 ml/min per g; ns) and Ado 8 (n = 3; 2.21, 1.92-5.70 ml/min per g; ns) were noted. Observed adverse effects, including hypotension, AV-block and ventricular premature contractions, were all mild, of short duration and immediately reversed after cessation of the adenosine infusion. CONCLUSION: MBF can be safely measured in cats using PET. An intravenous adenosine infusion at a rate of 280 microg/kg per minute seems most appropriate to induce maximal hyperaemic MBF response in healthy cats. Higher adenosine rates appear less suitable as they are associated with a large heterogeneity in flow increase and rate pressure product, most probably due to the large variability in haemodynamic and heart rate response.
Authors: Etienne Croteau; François Bénard; M'hamed Bentourkia; Jacques Rousseau; Michel Paquette; Roger Lecomte Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: G D Hutchins; M Schwaiger; K C Rosenspire; J Krivokapich; H Schelbert; D E Kuhl Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1990-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: P A Kaufmann; T Gnecchi-Ruscone; M di Terlizzi; K P Schäfers; T F Lüscher; P G Camici Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-09-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Pascal Koepfli; Christophe A Wyss; Mehdi Namdar; Michael Klainguti; Gustav K von Schulthess; Thomas F Lüscher; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Pilar Herrero; Joonyoung Kim; Terry L Sharp; John A Engelbach; Jason S Lewis; Robert J Gropler; Michael J Welch Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Kathryn M Meurs; Michelle M Norgard; Martina M Ederer; Kristina P Hendrix; Mark D Kittleson Journal: Genomics Date: 2007-05-22 Impact factor: 5.736