Literature DB >> 19104798

PET and MRI in cardiac imaging: from validation studies to integrated applications.

Stephan G Nekolla1, Axel Martinez-Moeller, Antti Saraste.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Positron emission tomography (PET) is the gold standard for non-invasive assessment of myocardial viability and allows accurate detection of coronary artery disease by assessment of myocardial perfusion. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides high resolution anatomical images that allow accurate evaluation of ventricular structure and function together with detection of myocardial infarction.
OBJECTIVE: Potential hybrid PET/MR tomography may potentially facilitate the combination of information from these imaging modalities in cardiology. Furthermore, the combination of anatomical MRI images with the high sensitivity of PET for detecting molecular targets may extent the application of these modalities to the characterization of atherosclerotic plaques and to the evaluation of angiogenetic or stem cell therapies, for example. DISCUSSION: This article reviews studies using MRI and PET in parallel to compare their performance in cardiac applications together with the potential benefits and applications provided by hybrid PET/MRI systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19104798     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-008-0980-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  57 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Waren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Characterization of human atherosclerotic plaques by intravascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Eric Larose; Yerem Yeghiazarians; Peter Libby; E Kent Yucel; Masanori Aikawa; Daniel F Kacher; Elena Aikawa; Scott Kinlay; Frederick J Schoen; Andrew P Selwyn; Peter Ganz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function.

Authors:  R J Kim; D S Fieno; T B Parrish; K Harris; E L Chen; O Simonetti; J Bundy; J P Finn; F J Klocke; R M Judd
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Preoperative positron emission tomographic viability assessment and perioperative and postoperative risk in patients with advanced ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  F Haas; C J Haehnel; W Picker; S Nekolla; S Martinoff; H Meisner; M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Cardiological applications of nuclear medicine.

Authors:  M Schwaiger; J Melin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-08-21       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Dual cardiac-respiratory gated PET: implementation and results from a feasibility study.

Authors:  Axel Martinez-Möller; Darko Zikic; René M Botnar; Ralph A Bundschuh; William Howe; Sibylle I Ziegler; Nassir Navab; Markus Schwaiger; Stephan G Nekolla
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Mechanism of late gadolinium enhancement in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Christoph Klein; Thaiz R Schmal; Stephan G Nekolla; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Eckart Fleck; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 8.  Assessment of myocardial viability in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Arend F L Schinkel; Don Poldermans; Abdou Elhendy; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kiran R Nandalur; Ben A Dwamena; Asim F Choudhri; Mohan R Nandalur; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I.

Authors:  Morteza Naghavi; Peter Libby; Erling Falk; S Ward Casscells; Silvio Litovsky; John Rumberger; Juan Jose Badimon; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Pedro Moreno; Gerard Pasterkamp; Zahi Fayad; Peter H Stone; Sergio Waxman; Paolo Raggi; Mohammad Madjid; Alireza Zarrabi; Allen Burke; Chun Yuan; Peter J Fitzgerald; David S Siscovick; Chris L de Korte; Masanori Aikawa; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Gerd Assmann; Christoph R Becker; James H Chesebro; Andrew Farb; Zorina S Galis; Chris Jackson; Ik-Kyung Jang; Wolfgang Koenig; Robert A Lodder; Keith March; Jasenka Demirovic; Mohamad Navab; Silvia G Priori; Mark D Rekhter; Raymond Bahr; Scott M Grundy; Roxana Mehran; Antonio Colombo; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie Ballantyne; William Insull; Robert S Schwartz; Robert Vogel; Patrick W Serruys; Goran K Hansson; David P Faxon; Sanjay Kaul; Helmut Drexler; Philip Greenland; James E Muller; Renu Virmani; Paul M Ridker; Douglas P Zipes; Prediman K Shah; James T Willerson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Multimodality imaging in interventional cardiology.

Authors:  Bas L van der Hoeven; Martin J Schalij; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  PET/MRI: current state of the art and future potential for cardiovascular applications.

Authors:  Nebiyu Adenaw; Michael Salerno
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Integration of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Ron Blankstein; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Hybrid PET/MR imaging in two sarcoma patients - clinical benefits and implications for future trials.

Authors:  Sasan Partovi; Andres A Kohan; Lisa Zipp; Peter Faulhaber; Christos Kosmas; Pablo R Ros; Mark R Robbin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-03-15

Review 5.  Disease-specific cardiovascular positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging: a brief review of the current literature.

Authors:  Jeffrey M C Lau; Jie Zheng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-06

Review 6.  Clinical use of cardiac PET/MRI: current state-of-the-art and potential future applications.

Authors:  Patrick Krumm; Stefanie Mangold; Sergios Gatidis; Konstantin Nikolaou; Felix Nensa; Fabian Bamberg; Christian la Fougère
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Coronary Artery PET/MR Imaging: Feasibility, Limitations, and Solutions.

Authors:  Philip M Robson; Marc R Dweck; Maria Giovanna Trivieri; Ronan Abgral; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Johanna Contreras; Umesh Gidwani; Jagat P Narula; Valentin Fuster; Jason C Kovacic; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-01-18

Review 8.  PET and MR imaging: the odd couple or a match made in heaven?

Authors:  Ciprian Catana; Alexander R Guimaraes; Bruce R Rosen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  PET-MRI: Challenges and new directions.

Authors:  Aditya Daftary
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-01

10.  Quantitative accuracy of attenuation correction in the Philips Ingenuity TF whole-body PET/MR system: a direct comparison with transmission-based attenuation correction.

Authors:  Georg Schramm; Jens Langner; Frank Hofheinz; Jan Petr; Bettina Beuthien-Baumann; Ivan Platzek; Jörg Steinbach; Jörg Kotzerke; Jörg van den Hoff
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.