Literature DB >> 10555743

Evaluation of rodent-only toxicology for early clinical trials with novel cancer therapeutics.

D R Newell1, S S Burtles, B W Fox, D I Jodrell, T A Connors.   

Abstract

Preclinical toxicology studies are performed prior to phase I trials with novel cancer therapeutics to identify a safe clinical starting dose and potential human toxicities. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of rodent-only toxicology studies to identify a safe phase I trial starting dose. In addition, the ability of murine studies to predict the quantitative and qualitative human toxicology of cancer therapeutics was studied. Data for 25 cancer drugs were collated for which the preclinical and clinical routes and schedules of administration were either the same (22/25), or closely matched. The maximum tolerated dose/dose lethal to 10% of mice (MTD/LD10) was identified for 24 drugs, and in patients the maximum administered dose (MAD) was associated with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in initial clinical trials with 20 compounds. In addition, for 13 agents, the toxicity of the drug at one-tenth the mouse MTD/LD10 was also investigated in rats, following repeated administration (20 doses). A phase I trial starting dose of one-tenth the mouse MTD/LD10 (mg m(-2)) was, or would have been, safe for all 25 compounds. With the exception of nausea and vomiting, which cannot be assessed in rodents, other common DLTs were accurately predicted by the murine studies (i.e. 7/7 haematological and 3/3 neurological DLTs). For two of the 13 drugs studied in rats, repeated administration of one-tenth the mouse MTD/LD10 was toxic, leading to a reduction in the phase I trial starting dose; however, one-tenth the mouse MTD/LD10 was subsequently tolerated in patients. For the 20 drugs where clinical DLT was reached, the median ratio of the human MAD to the mouse MTD/LD10 was 2.6 (range 0.2-16) and the median ratio of the clinical starting dose to the MAD was 35 (range 2.3-160). In contrast, in 13 subsequent phase I trials with 11 of the initial 25 drugs, the median ratio of the clinical starting dose to the MAD was 2.8 (range 1.6-56), emphasizing the value of early clinical data in rapidly defining the dose range for therapeutic studies. For all 25 drugs studied, rodent-only toxicology provided a safe and rapid means of identifying the phase I trial starting dose and predicting commonly encountered DLTs. This study has shown that the routine use of a non-rodent species in preclinical toxicology studies prior to initial clinical trials with cancer therapeutics is not necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10555743      PMCID: PMC2374299          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  46 in total

1.  A toxicity and pharmacokinetic study in man of the hypoxic-cell radiosensitiser RSU-1069.

Authors:  A Horwich; S B Holliday; J M Deacon; M J Peckham
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Phase I clinical trial of methylene dimethane sulfonate.

Authors:  D B Smith; B W Fox; N Thatcher; W P Steward; J H Scarffe; J Wagstaff; R Vezin; D Crowther
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1987-09

3.  Phase I clinical trial of mitozolomide.

Authors:  E S Newlands; G Blackledge; J A Slack; C Goddard; C J Brindley; L Holden; M F Stevens
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug

4.  Therapeutic response in phase I trials of antineoplastic agents.

Authors:  E Estey; D Hoth; R Simon; S Marsoni; B Leyland-Jones; R Wittes
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1986-09

5.  A phase I and pharmacology study of an oral platinum complex, JM216: dose-dependent pharmacokinetics with single-dose administration.

Authors:  M J McKeage; P Mistry; J Ward; F E Boxall; S Loh; C O'Neill; P Ellis; L R Kelland; S E Morgan; B Murrer
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of flavone acetic acid.

Authors:  D J Kerr; S B Kaye; J Cassidy; C Bradley; E M Rankin; L Adams; A Setanoians; T Young; G Forrest; M Soukop
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of LM985 (flavone acetic acid ester).

Authors:  D J Kerr; S B Kaye; J Graham; J Cassidy; M Harding; A Setanoians; J C McGrath; W R Vezin; D Cunningham; G Forrest
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Potential roles for preclinical pharmacology in phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  J M Collins; D S Zaharko; R L Dedrick; B A Chabner
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1986-01

9.  A phase 1 and pharmacokinetic study of didox: a ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor.

Authors:  D Veale; J Carmichael; B M Cantwell; H L Elford; R Blackie; D J Kerr; S B Kaye; A L Harris
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of amphethinile.

Authors:  D B Smith; C Ewen; J Mackintosh; B W Fox; N Thatcher; J H Scarffe; R Vezin; D Crowther
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  19 in total

1.  Extending clinical equipoise to phase 1 trials involving patients: unresolved problems.

Authors:  James A Anderson; Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2010-03

2.  How do researchers decide early clinical trials?

Authors:  Hannah Grankvist; Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-06

3.  Housing temperature-induced stress drives therapeutic resistance in murine tumour models through β2-adrenergic receptor activation.

Authors:  Jason W-L Eng; Chelsey B Reed; Kathleen M Kokolus; Rosemarie Pitoniak; Adam Utley; Mark J Bucsek; Wen Wee Ma; Elizabeth A Repasky; Bonnie L Hylander
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Choice of Starting Dose for Biopharmaceuticals in First-in-Human Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Aaron R Hansen; Natalie Cook; M Stacey Ricci; Albiruni Razak; Christophe Le Tourneau; Kathleen McKeever; Lorin Roskos; Rakesh Dixit; Lillian L Siu; Mary Jane Hinrichs
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-05-11

Review 5.  Murine models to evaluate novel and conventional therapeutic strategies for cancer.

Authors:  James E Talmadge; Rakesh K Singh; Isaiah J Fidler; Avraham Raz
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  The war on cancer: have we won the battle but lost the war?

Authors:  Rachel Brennan; Sara Federico; Michael A Dyer
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2010-06

7.  Scaling the time-course of myelosuppression from rats to patients with a semi-physiological model.

Authors:  Lena E Friberg; Marie Sandström; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 8.  AVN-101: A Multi-Target Drug Candidate for the Treatment of CNS Disorders.

Authors:  Alexandre V Ivachtchenko; Yan Lavrovsky; Ilya Okun
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.472

9.  A triple combination gemcitabine + romidepsin + cisplatin to effectively control triple-negative breast cancer tumor development, recurrence, and metastasis.

Authors:  Pawat Pattarawat; Jessica T Hunt; Jacob Poloway; Collin J Archibald; Hwa-Chain Robert Wang
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Professor Tom Connors and the development of novel cancer therapies by the Phase I/II Clinical Trials Committee of Cancer Research UK.

Authors:  D R Newell; K M Searle; N B Westwood; S S Burtles
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.