Literature DB >> 25964306

Choice of Starting Dose for Biopharmaceuticals in First-in-Human Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials.

Aaron R Hansen1, Natalie Cook1, M Stacey Ricci1, Albiruni Razak1, Christophe Le Tourneau1, Kathleen McKeever1, Lorin Roskos1, Rakesh Dixit1, Lillian L Siu2, Mary Jane Hinrichs1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: First-in-human (FIH) trials of low-molecular-weight anticancer agents conventionally derive a safe start dose (SD) from one-tenth the severely toxic dose in 10% of rodents or one-sixth the highest nonseverely toxic dose (HNSTD) in nonrodent species. No consensus has been reached on whether this paradigm can be safely applied to biotechnology-derived products (BDPs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted to identify all BDPs (excluding immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody drug conjugates) with sufficient nonclinical and clinical data to assess the safety of hypothetical use of one-sixth HNSTD in an advanced cancer FIH trial.
RESULTS: The search identified 23 BDPs, of which 21 were monoclonal antibodies. The median ratio of the maximum tolerated or maximum administered dose (MTD or MAD) to the actual FIH SD was 36 (range, 8-500). Only 2 BDPs reached the MTD. Hypothetical use of one-sixth HNSTD (allometrically scaled to humans) would not have exceeded the MTD or MAD for all 23 BDPs and would have reduced the median ratio of the MTD or MAD to a SD to 6.1 (range, 3.5-55.3). Pharmacodynamic (PD) markers were included in some animal toxicology studies and were useful to confirm the hypothetical SD of one-sixth HNSTD.
CONCLUSION: One-sixth HNSTD would not have resulted in unacceptable toxicities in the data available. Supporting its use could reduce the number of dose escalations needed to reach the recommended dose. A low incidence of toxicities in animals and humans underscores the need to identify the pharmacokinetic and PD parameters to guide SD selection of BDPs for FIH cancer trials. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Start dose (SD) for biotechnology-derived products (BDPs) can be safely derived from one-sixth the highest nonseverely toxic dose in nonrodent species and may reduce the number of dose escalations needed to reach the recommended dose in first-in-human studies while limiting unnecessary exposure to high drug levels in humans. The use of this type of SD could improve the design of phase I studies of BDPs by making them more efficient. The role of preclinical pharmacodynamic markers was useful in confirming the hypothetical SD, and attempts should be explored in future animal studies to identify such parameters. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal toxicology studies; Biotechnology derived products; Highest nonseverely toxic dose; Phase I clinical trials; Starting dose

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25964306      PMCID: PMC4571794          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  14 in total

Review 1.  Preclinical safety evaluation of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Joy A Cavagnaro
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  The no-observed-adverse-effect-level in drug safety evaluations: use, issues, and definition(s).

Authors:  Michael A Dorato; Jeffery A Engelhardt
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412.

Authors:  Ganesh Suntharalingam; Meghan R Perry; Stephen Ward; Stephen J Brett; Andrew Castello-Cortes; Michael D Brunner; Nicki Panoskaltsis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Similarity of biotechnology-derived medicinal products: specific problems and new regulatory framework.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Prugnaud
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  The EMEA guideline on first-in-human clinical trials and its impact on pharmaceutical development.

Authors:  Mark N Milton; Christopher J Horvath
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 1.902

Review 6.  Workshop on phase I study design. Ninth NCI/EORTC New Drug Development Symposium, Amsterdam, March 12, 1996.

Authors:  S G Arbuck
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Preclinical toxicology of anticancer agents.

Authors:  P S Schein
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited.

Authors:  Shannon Reagan-Shaw; Minakshi Nihal; Nihal Ahmad
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Animal toxicology for early clinical trials with anticancer agents.

Authors:  M Rozencweig; D D Von Hoff; M J Staquet; P S Schein; J S Penta; A Goldin; F M Muggia; E J Freireich; V T DeVita
Journal:  Cancer Clin Trials       Date:  1981

10.  Evaluation of rodent-only toxicology for early clinical trials with novel cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  D R Newell; S S Burtles; B W Fox; D I Jodrell; T A Connors
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Determination of the starting dose in the first-in-human clinical trials with monoclonal antibodies: a systematic review of papers published between 1990 and 2013.

Authors:  Hoon Young Suh; Carl C Peck; Kyung-Sang Yu; Howard Lee
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 2.  Biomarkers for nonclinical infusion reactions in marketed biotherapeutics and considerations for study design.

Authors:  Kirsten M Mease; Amy L Kimzey; Janice A Lansita
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-06

3.  Fisetin Prolongs Therapy Window of Brain Ischemic Stroke Using Tissue Plasminogen Activator: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Limin Wang; Di Cao; Huijun Wu; Hongning Jia; Chaoping Yang; Lihua Zhang
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

Review 4.  Allometric scaling of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in preclinical and clinical settings.

Authors:  Eva Germovsek; Ming Cheng; Craig Giragossian
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.