Literature DB >> 10547331

Auditory attention to space and frequency activates similar cerebral systems.

R J Zatorre1, T A Mondor, A C Evans.   

Abstract

PET was used to test the hypothesis that similar neural systems are involved in attending to spectral and to spatial features of sounds. In each of four conditions subjects heard tones varying randomly in frequency and location and responded to either the low- or the high-frequency stimuli, ignoring location, or to stimuli on the left or right, ignoring frequency. In comparison to a silent baseline, CBF increases were observed in auditory cortex bilaterally and in the right superior parietal, right dorsolateral frontal, and right premotor regions, with no modulation as a function of attentional condition. Analysis of regional covariation indicated a coordinated CBF response between the right parietal region and the right frontal and middle temporal regions. The data imply that auditory attention engages a network of right-hemisphere cortical regions for both spatial location and tonal frequency and support a model whereby auditory attention operates at a level at which separate features have been integrated into a unitary representation. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10547331     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  64 in total

1.  Listening to polyphonic music recruits domain-general attention and working memory circuits.

Authors:  Petr Janata; Barbara Tillmann; Jamshed J Bharucha
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Dynamics of a temporo-fronto-parietal network during sustained spatial or spectral auditory processing.

Authors:  Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Cerebellum and auditory function: an ALE meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Augusto Petacchi; Angela R Laird; Peter T Fox; James M Bower
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Modulation of auditory cortex activation by sound presentation rate and attention.

Authors:  Teemu Rinne; Johanna Pekkola; Alexander Degerman; Taina Autti; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Mikko Sams; Kimmo Alho
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Biasing the brain's attentional set: I. cue driven deployments of intersensory selective attention.

Authors:  John J Foxe; Gregory V Simpson; Seppo P Ahlfors; Clifford D Saron
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Neural basis of first and second language processing of sentence-level linguistic prosody.

Authors:  Jackson Gandour; Yunxia Tong; Thomas Talavage; Donald Wong; Mario Dzemidzic; Yisheng Xu; Xiaojian Li; Mark Lowe
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Does attention play a role in dynamic receptive field adaptation to changing acoustic salience in A1?

Authors:  Jonathan B Fritz; Mounya Elhilali; Stephen V David; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  EEG Mu (µ) rhythm spectra and oscillatory activity differentiate stuttering from non-stuttering adults.

Authors:  Tim Saltuklaroglu; Ashley W Harkrider; David Thornton; David Jenson; Tiffani Kittilstved
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Neural specializations for speech and pitch: moving beyond the dichotomies.

Authors:  Robert J Zatorre; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Switching auditory attention using spatial and non-spatial features recruits different cortical networks.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.