Literature DB >> 10546636

Clinically applied models of bone regeneration in tissue engineering research.

T A Einhorn1.   

Abstract

The development of new strategies for the engineering of bone regeneration requires appropriate model systems. Selection of the best model for testing a new technology depends on a host of factors. In general, the best model system is the one which most closely mimics the clinical situation for which this technology is being developed, will not heal spontaneously unless the technology is used, and will not heal when another technology is used if that technology is less advanced than the one being tested. For the purposes of developing new strategies for bone regeneration, systems which can be considered include those which model normal fracture healing, the segmental loss of bone or critical size defects, and various forms of nonunions in which fracture healing is perturbed either by mechanical, metabolic, or neurologic means. Careful experimental design and selection of the appropriate model system will enhance scientific efforts in bone regeneration research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10546636     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199910001-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  22 in total

1.  Effect of mechanical stimuli on skeletal regeneration around implants.

Authors:  Philipp Leucht; Jae-Beom Kim; Rima Wazen; Jennifer A Currey; Antonio Nanci; John B Brunski; Jill A Helms
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Amniotic fluid stem cells produce robust mineral deposits on biodegradable scaffolds.

Authors:  Alexandra Peister; Eric R Deutsch; Yash Kolambkar; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Custom-made composite scaffolds for segmental defect repair in long bones.

Authors:  Johannes C Reichert; Martin E Wullschleger; Amaia Cipitria; Jasmin Lienau; Tan K Cheng; Michael A Schütz; Georg N Duda; Ulrich Nöth; Jochen Eulert; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Evaluation of bone regeneration using the rat critical size calvarial defect.

Authors:  Patrick P Spicer; James D Kretlow; Simon Young; John A Jansen; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Reduced differentiation efficiency of murine embryonic stem cells in stirred suspension bioreactors.

Authors:  Jaymi T Taiani; Roman J Krawetz; Nicole I Zur Nieden; Yiru Elizabeth Wu; Michael S Kallos; John R Matyas; Derrick E Rancourt
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.272

6.  Evaluation criteria for musculoskeletal and craniofacial tissue engineering constructs: a conference report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Altered fracture repair in the absence of MMP9.

Authors:  Céline Colnot; Zachary Thompson; Theodore Miclau; Zena Werb; Jill A Helms
Journal:  Development       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 8.  Bone Regeneration Based on Tissue Engineering Conceptions - A 21st Century Perspective.

Authors:  Jan Henkel; Maria A Woodruff; Devakara R Epari; Roland Steck; Vaida Glatt; Ian C Dickinson; Peter F M Choong; Michael A Schuetz; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 13.567

9.  Basic research in orthopedic surgery: Current trends and future directions.

Authors:  Chuanyong Lu; Jenni M Buckley; Céline Colnot; Ralph Marcucio; Theodore Miclau
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Skeletal cell fate decisions within periosteum and bone marrow during bone regeneration.

Authors:  Céline Colnot
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.