Literature DB >> 19344289

Amniotic fluid stem cells produce robust mineral deposits on biodegradable scaffolds.

Alexandra Peister1, Eric R Deutsch, Yash Kolambkar, Dietmar W Hutmacher, Robert E Guldberg.   

Abstract

Insufficient availability of osteogenic cells limits bone regeneration through cell-based therapies. This study investigated the potential of amniotic fluid-derived stem (AFS) cells to synthesize mineralized extracellular matrix within porous medical-grade poly-epsilon-caprolactone (mPCL) scaffolds. The AFS cells were initially differentiated in two-dimensional (2D) culture to determine appropriate osteogenic culture conditions and verify physiologic mineral production by the AFS cells. The AFS cells were then cultured on 3D mPCL scaffolds (6-mm diameter x 9-mm height) and analyzed for their ability to differentiate to osteoblastic cells in this environment. The amount and distribution of mineralized matrix production was quantified throughout the mPCL scaffold using nondestructive micro computed tomography (microCT) analysis and confirmed through biochemical assays. Sterile microCT scanning provided longitudinal analysis of long-term cultured mPCL constructs to determine the rate and distribution of mineral matrix within the scaffolds. The AFS cells deposited mineralized matrix throughout the mPCL scaffolds and remained viable after 15 weeks of 3D culture. The effect of pre-differentiation of the AFS cells on the subsequent bone formation in vivo was determined in a rat subcutaneous model. Cells that were pre-differentiated for 28 days in vitro produced seven times more mineralized matrix when implanted subcutaneously in vivo. This study demonstrated the potential of AFS cells to produce 3D mineralized bioengineered constructs in vitro and in vivo and suggests that AFS cells may be an effective cell source for functional repair of large bone defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19344289      PMCID: PMC2792053          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2008.0536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  32 in total

1.  Isolation of a highly clonogenic and multipotential subfraction of adult stem cells from bone marrow stroma.

Authors:  Jason R Smith; Radhika Pochampally; Anthony Perry; Shu-Ching Hsu; Darwin J Prockop
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 2.  Bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future trends.

Authors:  António J Salgado; Olga P Coutinho; Rui L Reis
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2004-08-09       Impact factor: 4.979

3.  Exogenous Runx2 expression enhances in vitro osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization in primary bone marrow stromal cells.

Authors:  Benjamin A Byers; Andrés J García
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

Review 4.  Amniotic fluid and placental stem cells.

Authors:  Dawn M Delo; Paolo De Coppi; Georg Bartsch; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 5.  Future potentials for using osteogenic stem cells and biomaterials in orthopedics.

Authors:  R O Oreffo; J T Triffitt
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Amniotic fluid and bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells can be converted to smooth muscle cells in the cryo-injured rat bladder and prevent compensatory hypertrophy of surviving smooth muscle cells.

Authors:  Paolo De Coppi; Andrea Callegari; Angela Chiavegato; Lisa Gasparotto; Martina Piccoli; Jenny Taiani; Michela Pozzobon; Luisa Boldrin; Masaru Okabe; Emanuele Cozzi; Anthony Atala; Piergiorgio Gamba; Saverio Sartore
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  The difficult healing of segmental fractures of the tibial shaft.

Authors:  P M Rommens; W Coosemans; P L Broos
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Fractures of allografts. Frequency, treatment, and end-results.

Authors:  B H Berrey; C F Lord; M C Gebhardt; H J Mankin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Three-dimensional culture of rat calvarial osteoblasts in porous biodegradable polymers.

Authors:  S L Ishaug-Riley; G M Crane-Kruger; M J Yaszemski; A G Mikos
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  The immunogenicity and immunomodulatory function of osteogenic cells differentiated from mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Hua Liu; David Michael Kemeny; Boon Chin Heng; Hong Wei Ouyang; Alirio J Melendez; Tong Cao
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 5.422

View more
  22 in total

1.  Colonization and osteogenic differentiation of different stem cell sources on electrospun nanofiber meshes.

Authors:  Yash M Kolambkar; Alexandra Peister; Andrew K Ekaputra; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  Osteogenic differentiation of amniotic fluid mesenchymal stromal cells and their bone regeneration potential.

Authors:  Caterina Pipino; Assunta Pandolfi
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  Combined effect of three types of biophysical stimuli for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Kyung Shin Kang; Jung Min Hong; Young Hun Jeong; Young-Joon Seol; Woon-Jae Yong; Jong-Won Rhie; Dong-Woo Cho
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  Perinatal stem cells: A promising cell resource for tissue engineering of craniofacial bone.

Authors:  Jia-Wen Si; Xu-Dong Wang; Steve Gf Shen
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.326

5.  Biological characterization and pluripotent identification of ovine amniotic fluid stem cells.

Authors:  Wenhua Pei; Tengfei Lu; Kunfu Wang; Meng Ji; Shuang Zhang; Fenghao Chen; Lu Li; Xiangchen Li; Weijun Guan
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 2.058

6.  Functional restoration of critically sized segmental defects with bone morphogenetic protein-2 and heparin treatment.

Authors:  Mela R Johnson; Joel D Boerckel; Kenneth M Dupont; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor induced the differentiation of amniotic fluid-derived stem cells into vascular endothelial-like cells in vitro.

Authors:  Ruyu Zhang; Ying Lu; Ju Li; Jia Wang; Caixia Liu; Fang Gao; Dong Sun
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.611

Review 8.  Cell sources for bone regeneration: the good, the bad, and the ugly (but promising).

Authors:  Pamela Gehron Robey
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 9.  CD117(+) amniotic fluid stem cells: state of the art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Mara Cananzi; Paolo De Coppi
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 10.  Amniotic fluid-derived stem cells for cardiovascular tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Jennifer Petsche Connell; Gulden Camci-Unal; Ali Khademhosseini; Jeffrey G Jacot
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 6.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.