| Literature DB >> 19838378 |
Chuanyong Lu1, Jenni M Buckley, Céline Colnot, Ralph Marcucio, Theodore Miclau.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19838378 PMCID: PMC2762563 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.55969
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Orthop ISSN: 0019-5413 Impact factor: 1.251
Examples of cutting-edge research topics in orthopedic biomechanical research
| Orthopedic sub-specialty | |
|---|---|
| Spine | • Quantifying spinal kinematics in normal versus diseased cases |
| • Understanding biomechanical contributions to adjacent segment disease | |
| • Comparison of motion preserving versus fusion technologies | |
| Trauma and sports medicine | • Comparison of traditional versus less-invasive implants for bone fracture and soft tissue repair |
| • Investigating the use of cements and adhesives to create more rigid fracture repair constructs that can support immediate weight bearing | |
| Arthroplasty | • Optimization of bearing surfaces for total hip and knee prostheses |
| • Geometric and bearing surface optimization for total disc and total ankle replacements | |
| Computational Modeling | • Translating established continuum-based constitutive models for orthopedic tissues into finite element based algorithms |
| • High-resolution finite element modeling of trabecular bone to study micro-scale damage accumulation | |
| • Multi-scale finite element modeling techniques to model bone-implant interfaces | |
| • Iterative finite element techniques to to integrate continuum-level effects of bone healing (Wolfe's Law) into traditional structural models of human bones and bone-implant systems | |
| Wearable and implantable sensor systems | • Application of MEMS technology to traditional implant designs to measure loading |
| Intra-operative navigation systems | • Comparison of the accuracy and mechanical integrity of bone-implant constructs performed using navigated percutaneous vs. traditional open techniques |
| Mechanical testing standards | • Development of appropriate testing standards for new implant designs in the spine, ankle, and upper extremities |
MEMS = Microelectro mechanical system
Recommended lab design for developing orthopedic biomechanics programs (Designs for both computationally-focused and experimentally-focused programs are provided)
| Computational | |
|---|---|
| Laboratory space | • A desk in an office |
| Specialized equipment | • 1 computer workstation (dual-processor plus graphics card recommended) |
| • 1 software license for a finite element program with pre and post-processing capabilities (Abaqus recommended) | |
| Staffing | • 1 professional engineer or advanced engineering student (MS or PhD-level recommended) from a mechanical or computer engineering background |
| Experimental | |
| Laboratory space | • Minimum of 400 assignable square feet |
| • Certified for handling of human and animal tissue | |
| • Temperature-controlled and well ventilated | |
| Specialized equipment | • 1 axial or axial-torsional mechanical testing system. Instron or MTS recommended (USD$150K), although less expensive models are available (TestResources, USD$10K-$20K) |
| • High (20 kN) and low (100 N) capacity uniaxial load cells (1 each). Multi-axial load cells necessary for off-axis testing protocols (USD$6K, AMTI recommended) | |
| • Household refrigerators and freezers for specimen storage | |
| Staff | • Minimum of one full-time professional engineer and one research assistant (may be a student) to conduct experiments |
| • 6-9 months of on-the-job training is necessary for staff to become proficient in running experimental protocols | |
| Other considerations | • A source of cadaveric tissue or animal tissue is needed for |
| • Partnerships with orthopaedic device companies, are frequently necessary in order to test orthopaedic implants | |
| • Access to standard clinical radiographic equipment is necessary. Particularly DEXA, planar x-ray, and occasionally CT |